Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Solid Signal Blog
Think back to 2003. Yes, it was 20 years ago. In some ways it seems like 100 years ago. Back in 2003, your cell phone got most of its use actually making calls. You checked your email once a day or so, and while you were impressed by the amazing speed of your brand-new always-on internet, it was probably about 1 megabit (or less.) Chances are you spent a lot more time interacting with the people near you, and, when you watched TV, you watched live TV.

A world without on demand


That's right, on-demand was extremely new back then, as was the DVR. Most people had some idea that these technologies existed, but unless you were a seriously early adopter, you never used these things. Live TV was king, and you were just fine with that.

The earth has gone around the sun a few times since then, and so I ask, "does live TV still matter?" An increasing amount of TV is consumed either from a DVR or from some sort of on-demand source like Netflix or Hulu. It's actually possible that you may not watch any live TV in an average week, especially if you're under 50.

Live TV sure matters to the people who make it


Local broadcasters and broadcast networks still haven't got that message, though. Those old titans, the ones who ruled the world in 1963, 1983, and even 2003 haven't quite gotten the message that for the most part, live TV actually doesn't matter. News is important. Sports are important. A rapidly decreasing number of relevant reality programs are important to watch as they unfold. A very small number of scripted programs demand that you stop and watch as soon as they air, but past that, people are just as happy to watch on their own schedules, especially if this means that they can skip commercials.

What does this mean for the future?


It means trouble, if you're a traditional broadcaster. For the last five years or so, local broadcasters have been gutting their news and local interest resources, importing canned programs from their increasingly massive corporate owners. It means that the world of local programming is teetering on a precipice and station owners don't seem to notice or care.

I personally feel that the traditional broadcast model just needs one little push to drop into chaos. Those in the desirable 18-34 demographic don't watch a lot of TV already, and personally I'm worried that a small push could cause them to lose interest altogether.

But here's the interesting thing…


I have to wonder if the major broadcast networks even care. I have this conspiracy theory floating in my head that the big boys, the CBS's, ABC,'s, etc. of the world, would love to divest themselves of the old network model. Local network affiliates were important to them when over-the-air was the only game in town. Today, these companies would be just as happy to be cable/satellite-delivered only, but they can't do it as long as those pesky network contracts are in place. Those contracts mean that network programming is only available from network affiliates. It stops the broadcast networks from offering national programming over cable or satellite. That limitation has been in place since the very beginning of broadcasting.

You'll notice, of course, that all the big broadcasters already offer content directly over streaming. I have a feeling this is just a sign of things to come. If broadcast networks let their affiliates fail, they could be free to do whatever they want. This would include producing salacious programming of the sort one only finds on HBO or Showtime now. They could go whole-hog on a national subscription model. Think about it – CBS, ABC, and NBC all have streaming apps. CBS even lets you watch live local TV from theirs.

So I would say "yes," live TV does matter, but not the same way that it used to. Live TV is the bargaining chip, the last thing holding the old broadcast model together. It should be interesting to see what happens to live TV in the next couple of years. Even if you're not actually interested in watching it, it's going to affect you.

The post Does live TV even matter anymore? appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
11 Replies · 1037 views
S
50% of viewing time is hardly insignificant.

Somebody ought to tell these people that local TV is dying.

Tegna Inc. - Wikipedia. $631M PROFIT
Sinclair Broadcast Group - Wikipedia $245M PROFIT
Nexstar Media Group - Wikipedia $808M PROFIT

Of course the local stations in the big cities belong to the networks themselves, and contribute yet more billions to their bottom lines. Covering their losses from streaming.

The Market has spoken. The average person spends 50% of their TV time watching traditional "live TV" (linear TV). 37% of their time on streaming, of which about a third is YouTube and FAST, which is free. Not enough people want what paid streaming has to cover its bills. And its only significant bill is content, which is burned daily, unlike other ventures that took time to become profitable, as they had actual hard physical assets to build like satellites or cables. Heck, streaming makes the customer pay for the delivery system (internet service and the smart TV). We know that streaming is unprofitable. That isn't changing. The Market has spoken.

Local TV will remain a part of most people's lives for as long as they live. It is a highly profitable industry, granted a neo-monopoly by the government, to provide what people actually want. Networks will remain as well, even the grossly mismanaged Disney, for many decades to come. Cable channels, except of course for ESPN or anything else they are stupid enough to sell a la carte, will likewise remain mega-profitable. A streaming service, filling the niche HBO once filled (a supplement to the basic channels) besides Netflix might make it, but it seems unlikely.
Bruce
ummm,
  • TEGNA achieved net income of $200 million on a GAAP basis, or $97 million on a non-GAAP basis.
harshness
TEGNA achieved net income of $200 million on a GAAP basis, or $97 million on a non-GAAP basis
Back when they were reporting, DIRECTV had more than a few non-GAAP numbers that they put forth. Many consider non-GAAP to be non-factual as all that can safely be said is that they aren't accounted for in the conventional way..
Bruce
Back when they were reporting, DIRECTV had more than a few non-GAAP numbers that they put forth. Many consider non-GAAP to be non-factual as all that can safely be said is that they aren't accounted for in the conventional way..
What does that have to do with the actual numbers.
harshness
What does that have to do with the actual numbers.
GAAP is actual numbers according to conventional standards (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice). Non-GAAP is any other scheme that somebody in Accounting or Management once thought was somehow better. In many cases, the non-GAAP methodology is not revealed.

If the GAAP number is significantly different from the non-GAAP number, you have to wonder what they're doing differently to depart from GAAP. Some companies choose not to make their GAAP numbers readily available and only offer non-GAAP numbers.
Bruce
GAAP is actual numbers according to conventional standards (Generally Accepted Accounting Practice). Non-GAAP is any other scheme that somebody in Accounting or Management once thought was somehow better. In many cases, the non-GAAP methodology is not revealed.

If the GAAP number is significantly different from the non-GAAP number, you have to wonder what they're doing differently to depart from GAAP. Some companies choose not to make their GAAP numbers readily available and only offer non-GAAP numbers.
I know all that, why are you posting it, all I was doing was correcting his inaccurate numbers.
M
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Over the past few weeks, I have had problems connecting to streaming services (Netflix, HBO et al). When I go to the TV's native Channels, I have no problem. The Dish internet troubleshooter shows I have a good internet connection. I'm wondering whether it's an issue with my internet provider or a problem with the Dish software on the Hopper Plus. Anyone else seeing this?
1 Replies · 79 views
Almighty1
Over the past few weeks, I have had problems connecting to streaming services (Netflix, HBO et al). When I go to the TV's native Channels, I have no problem. The Dish internet troubleshooter shows I have a good internet connection. I'm wondering whether it's an issue with my internet provider or a problem with the Dish software on the Hopper Plus. Anyone else seeing this?
I have a DISH Hopper 3 (Software H713) with Hopper Plus (Software P15403). I have not tried streaming services but I primarily watch TVB Jadeworld international package which is only available by streaming and when I have an issue, I usually have to go to a non-streaming satellite channel first before the streaming channels will work again. What software versions do you have and what is the error message if any are showing on your screen? or is that Dish downloading logo just stuck and never finishes?
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
· posted in The Chit Chat Club
It states the average amount they are under water is OVER $7,000. :eek

Personally, I tend to be the type that drives a vehicle for a lot of years....do my own oil changes and other fluid changes. Just replaced the spark plugs and a couple coils. Youtube is great for things like this.

0 Replies · 7 views
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68659 Replies · 2680255 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
long_time_Dish
Take It Easy - The Eagles
jamieh1
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV Programming Forum
DIRECTV Stream/Internet added Ch 4105 SportsGrid
268 Replies · 38713 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand and KyL416
K
Now live:
4101 Yahoo! Sports Network
4121 DP World Tour
4195 F1 Channel
4196 MotoGP Channel
K
Now live:
4275 Law & Crime
4364 Military Makeover Channel
K
Game Show Central is now live on channel 4342
K
Now live:
4101 Yahoo! Sports Network
4121 DP World Tour
4195 F1 Channel
4196 MotoGP Channel
It only took them 41 days to announce it
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
K
Now testing:
AyM Sports 3 USA
Best Bets TV powered by VSiN
CBS Sports Golazo Network
CBS Sports HQ
Judge Judy
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 5 views
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5449 Replies · 336094 views
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
dfergie
IMG_5955.webp

Sweet tea…
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby and TRG
TRG
TRG
Tuna salad sandwich on toasted honey whole wheat bread with a handful of kettle chips. Water.
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 51 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 288 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.