Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
· posted in The Solid Signal Blog
If you're just settling into adulthood today in your late-20s, chances are that the first computer you touched ran Windows 98. The Windows 98 operating system, as the name would imply, was released in the summer of 1998. It was marketed as a tweak to the hugely popular Windows95, baking in advanced graphics and internet features that previously required a lot of extra work to use. It was the first Microsoft operating system to support USB at all, and one of the last operating systems from Microsoft to be exclusively marketed to consumers.

Windows 98 officially lived its life as Microsoft's flagship for two years. It was replaced by Windows Me, or (Windows Millennium Edition, because everyone loved using the word "Millennium" at the time) but there was only one problem. Windows Me didn't work very well. It was generally less compatible and more buggy than Windows 98. Consumers who could stay on Win98 did so, and so the operating system was the standard-bearer for Microsoft until the fall of 2001 when WindowsXP was released.

Surprisingly, internet sources say that Microsoft continued patching Windows 98 until 2002 for most people but some support continued to exist until 2006. At the time, that kind of longevity was unheard of.

The young people


This article was inspired by this video from about a year ago:


When I watched it, I was expecting another low blow aimed at millennials. You've seen these videos where they ask millennials or GenZ to do something like use a rotary phone or play a cassette tape. They're fun for the older people to watch and they make us feel like we have some sort of secret knowledge. However, most of us are keenly aware that we're not any better with the culture of 2023 than those youngsters are with the culture of 1993.

I was pleasantly surprised that not only did this crop of late millennials know how to use Windows 98, many of them remembered esoteric bits of the OS fondly. This was the software they learned on as small children, the software their parents watched them use. For some, it was their first opportunity to use the internet at all. Far from becoming frustrated, the younger folks look back at Windows 98 as they would a teddy bear or school project. While I don't have those same feelings for Windows 98, I understand the concept. Being in a room with a VT100 terminal does much the same for me.

Is it all that different?


WIndows 98 was the first "evolutionary" operating system from Microsoft. Windows 95 was a complete reimagining of the computer experience, and Windows 98 didn't stray too much from the lessons learned there. Microsoft could have paid attention there. They didn't. Windows XP was a giant jump from Windows 98, and customers embraced it. But it was the last time Microsoft got to make a huge leap with customer approval. Practically every Windows version since has met with a lot of resistance when making even the smallest change. Big changes like the move to Windows 8 nearly sank the company and they were forced to backtrack quickly with Windows 8.1.

But I digress. Going back to Windows 98, you'll find a lot of familiar bits. They all seem embryonic, not fully formed. But you have a start menu, you have basic apps, and you have the kind of diagnostics you'll need for when things get flaky. You even have support for audio, video, and graphics. You have silly tweaks like animated screen savers. It's all there.

On the other hand, you also have a bunch of weird features that either no one used at the time or just didn't work. Microsoft introduced "My Briefcase." It was Microsoft's attempt to have things sync to the cloud. Except, of course, there was no cloud. You put things in "My Briefcase" and told it that a floppy disk was your briefcase. Whenever you inserted that floppy disk, all the stuff would sync back and forth. There were two problems here. First of all it didn't really work. Second, no one really understood why you'd use it.

Windows 98 included better support for local networking as well as internet. Again this worked great if you knew how to use it. No one seemed to know how to use it very well. It wasn't much of a problem since no one had wired Ethernet at home anyway. Wi-Fi hadn't even been invented at this point.

Did I love Windows 98 like these youngsters?


Despite it being a home operating system, I used Windows 98 at work. I used it at the first place where I was sort of a network administrator. It wasn't the first OS I used to get on the internet. But, it was the first time that I managed other people getting on the internet. They all used Windows 98 and I trained them on how to do it.

In the late 1990s Microsoft had an unbroken string of wins. It was a foregone conclusion that you'd like what they did next. Sadly, the streak ended with a series of awful products like WIndows Me and Microsoft Bob. (Don't know what Microsoft Bob is? Search for it. You'll groan.) By the turn of the century, Microsoft still ruled the roost. They wouldn't rule it for much longer, though. In the space of one decade, we made a massive change. In 2000, we used our computers in one room in the house. By 2010, we carried them with us in our pockets.

Microsoft completely failed to capitalize on the move from PCs to mobile. They tried, but their Windows Mobile OS was confusing and boring compared to iOS and Android. It failed quickly, and failed hard.

Young folks look back fondly on Windows 98.


I have a feeling a lot of Microsoft execs do too. It marked the last time users unconditionally loved Microsoft. Seems to me the company would do anything to get that sentiment back.

The post FUN FRIDAY: Young People try Windows 98 appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
0 Replies · 265 views
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5448 Replies · 336080 views
M
Garlic cheese bread
Green beans
Apples
Chocolate Milk
Some weird noodles. ;)
(They have salad and a couple other fruits if wanted)
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
dfergie
IMG_5955.webp

Sweet tea…
  • Like
Reactions: TRG
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680220 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 46 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 285 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 51 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 55 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.