Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Solid Signal Blog
Friends, I've written about the "right to repair" several times on this blog. Most recently, I dredged up an article from 2018 where I talk about that very issue. I talk about it because I think about it. I think about it because I've been using consumer electronics now for about 50 years, that is if you count my Donald Duck record player. And every so often, in the middle of the night, I'm struck with the very real fact that every piece of consumer gear I've ever owned is still out there somewhere.

Until the mid-2000s it was not only legal but normal to just put old consumer electronics in the trash. Presumably that stuff went to landfills. Because it's mostly plastic and silicon, it's still there in largely recognizable form today. This means, much to my shame, that there's a trail of old stuff going all across the country and it all used to belong to me.

It almost makes me wish I'd kept everything, no matter how trivial, just so I could know how much of it there has been. This particular clip from Season 9 of The Big Bang Theory illustrates how that would work:

One good reason to hold onto old stuff


The first and best reason to hold on to old stuff is that it may one day be valuable. Every couple of weeks I get bored and look on eBay for something I once owned. Every so often I run into something that would actually still be worth real money if I had it. But I admit that most of the stuff I owned is not terribly interesting, and there's no market for it. Still, I think we've all had that moment where we've thought, "if only I'd held on to my…" and certainly I have too.

The AirPods problem


Quite a few years ago, I won a contest where the prize was a brand new pair of first generation AirPods. I still have them, and the battery life isn't terrible. Honestly I don't need them to have more than an hour of two of life generally speaking. But, I also have a much newer pair of AirPods that sound better, last longer, and have cool features. Both pairs are sitting on my desk. I'll use the older ones for video calls during the day so I don't run down the battery on my other ones. But, I can tell that the old AirPods are going to fail at some point.

They'll fail because the non-replaceable batteries in them won't work anymore. I'm far from the first person to talk about this. The seminal article on the subject, the one everyone links to, is from 2019. In the meantime, I guess there are some shops which have figured out how to replace those batteries but it's a pretty time-consuming process. It's never going to be terribly cost effective.

At least with the original AirPods, the battery was in the stalk so it was theoretically possible to reach it. CT scans of AirPods Pro 2 like the one at the top of this article have been circulating for a while.

What they show is that the battery is located in the top part, and that it's literally surrounded by electronics. This makes it essentially utterly impossible to replace even if you could open the things up (which you can't.)

Headed for the boneyard


And that means sooner or later, close to 100% of the over 300 million individual AirPods that have been sold will end up in recycling centers or landfills. Actually recycling them isn't going to be easy. If you really want to get a meaningful return on your recycling investment, you need to separate out the metal from the plastic before you start. Even better, you should separate out the toxic stuff like lead from the non-toxic stuff like gold and silicon. But none of that is possible with AirPods. When they're recycled, if they're recycled, they'll be melted at a temperature where the plastic and lead fall off but other metals stay put. This is a very inefficient way of recycling and it leads to a lot of toxic waste.

We really need to figure out how to address this.


Apple spends a lot of time and effort telling you how they're working on being carbon-neutral and making everything it can out of recycled materials. And yet, unless there's something they haven't told us, they're still producing millions of tons of stuff that can't be recycled easily. There is, apparently, a huge amount of technology in AirPods. The engineering is amazing and that's why they work so well. But it seems like none of that engineering is going toward end-of-life options for them. If nothing else, the plastic cases should be created in such a way that a special tool could remove them. That would if nothing else allow the plastic to go one way and the metal to go another. And that's a start.

In the meantime though, I have to simply say that this stuff keeps me up at night. Does it keep you up at night?

The post OPINION: The AirPods problem appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
1 Replies · 402 views
jorgek
Friends, I've written about the "right to repair" several times on this blog. Most recently, I dredged up an article from 2018 where I talk about that very issue. I talk about it because I think about it. I think about it because I've been using consumer electronics now for about 50 years, that is if you count my Donald Duck record player. And every so often, in the middle of the night, I'm struck with the very real fact that every piece of consumer gear I've ever owned is still out there somewhere.

Until the mid-2000s it was not only legal but normal to just put old consumer electronics in the trash. Presumably that stuff went to landfills. Because it's mostly plastic and silicon, it's still there in largely recognizable form today. This means, much to my shame, that there's a trail of old stuff going all across the country and it all used to belong to me.

It almost makes me wish I'd kept everything, no matter how trivial, just so I could know how much of it there has been. This particular clip from Season 9 of The Big Bang Theory illustrates how that would work:

One good reason to hold onto old stuff


The first and best reason to hold on to old stuff is that it may one day be valuable. Every couple of weeks I get bored and look on eBay for something I once owned. Every so often I run into something that would actually still be worth real money if I had it. But I admit that most of the stuff I owned is not terribly interesting, and there's no market for it. Still, I think we've all had that moment where we've thought, "if only I'd held on to my…" and certainly I have too.

The AirPods problem


Quite a few years ago, I won a contest where the prize was a brand new pair of first generation AirPods. I still have them, and the battery life isn't terrible. Honestly I don't need them to have more than an hour of two of life generally speaking. But, I also have a much newer pair of AirPods that sound better, last longer, and have cool features. Both pairs are sitting on my desk. I'll use the older ones for video calls during the day so I don't run down the battery on my other ones. But, I can tell that the old AirPods are going to fail at some point.

They'll fail because the non-replaceable batteries in them won't work anymore. I'm far from the first person to talk about this. The seminal article on the subject, the one everyone links to, is from 2019. In the meantime, I guess there are some shops which have figured out how to replace those batteries but it's a pretty time-consuming process. It's never going to be terribly cost effective.

At least with the original AirPods, the battery was in the stalk so it was theoretically possible to reach it. CT scans of AirPods Pro 2 like the one at the top of this article have been circulating for a while.

What they show is that the battery is located in the top part, and that it's literally surrounded by electronics. This makes it essentially utterly impossible to replace even if you could open the things up (which you can't.)

Headed for the boneyard


And that means sooner or later, close to 100% of the over 300 million individual AirPods that have been sold will end up in recycling centers or landfills. Actually recycling them isn't going to be easy. If you really want to get a meaningful return on your recycling investment, you need to separate out the metal from the plastic before you start. Even better, you should separate out the toxic stuff like lead from the non-toxic stuff like gold and silicon. But none of that is possible with AirPods. When they're recycled, if they're recycled, they'll be melted at a temperature where the plastic and lead fall off but other metals stay put. This is a very inefficient way of recycling and it leads to a lot of toxic waste.

We really need to figure out how to address this.


Apple spends a lot of time and effort telling you how they're working on being carbon-neutral and making everything it can out of recycled materials. And yet, unless there's something they haven't told us, they're still producing millions of tons of stuff that can't be recycled easily. There is, apparently, a huge amount of technology in AirPods. The engineering is amazing and that's why they work so well. But it seems like none of that engineering is going toward end-of-life options for them. If nothing else, the plastic cases should be created in such a way that a special tool could remove them. That would if nothing else allow the plastic to go one way and the metal to go another. And that's a start.

In the meantime though, I have to simply say that this stuff keeps me up at night. Does it keep you up at night?

The post OPINION: The AirPods problem appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
Until recently I used Leviton brand outdoor light timers. The regular in wall ON/OFF switch is replaced with this progammable timer which also tracks sunset/sunrise. Set it once it never needs resetting. The internal backup battery is there in case of power glitches or outages. Between 2-3 years the internal battery fails and now you are at the mercy of power glitches and constantly resetting the unit. There is no way to replace the battery. Leviton is quite happy to sell you a whole new timer ($50 in Canada) to replace a $1 battery. I now buy another brand of timer which includes an easy to replace battery!
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5448 Replies · 336076 views
M
Garlic cheese bread
Green beans
Apples
Chocolate Milk
Some weird noodles. ;)
(They have salad and a couple other fruits if wanted)
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
dfergie
IMG_5955.webp

Sweet tea…
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680216 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 46 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 284 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 51 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 55 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.