Social Feed

Stuart Sweet
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
· posted in The Solid Signal Blog
Here's something I've recently had to contend with. If young people think the tech you used when you were their age is "classic" or "retro," you my friend are officially old. In fact, you are old as …. well I don't use profanity on this blog but you get the idea.

This very idea came to me when I was exploring this video:


In which a fellow who, I would guess, is about 35, just gushes over a beat up, broken Power Macintosh 9600 and then proceeds to clean it up and adapt it to use modern forms of storage. This set off a cascade of feelings for me, and this being a blog after all, I decided to share them with you.

Although I can't exactly blame the guy.


Apple's Power Macintosh 9600 was a very interesting beast. In the 1990s, Apple was stuck. Their computers really only appealed to a small group of creatives and designers, and they were incredibly expensive. Apple itself couldn't decide what they wanted their computers to be, and keep in mind the computer was virtually Apple's only product at the time. The iPod wouldn't come out until a few years later, but I'm getting ahead of myself.

Yes, Apple's computers were expensive and incompatible and all that. But in the early 1990s they were some of the best hardware you could buy. The company had really gotten into the groove of creating durable hardware that was way faster than it had a right to be at the time. Their operating system beat Windows in almost every way. And, not to be forgotten, their keyboards were some of the best ever made.

Apple_Extended_Keyboard.jpg


Laugh if you will, but this keyboard worked so well that people are still buying them and refurbishing them today.

Apple's big wrong turn


Now, someone out there will know why (I never understood why) but in the mid-1990s Apple moved away from Motorola processors to IBM's PowerPC processor line. Motorola processors had been a key feature of everything from Apple ][ computers to Sega video games, and Apple just said, "nope." They decided to move instead to an untested processor that just didn't work very well. They celebrated this move by dubbing all of their pro computers as "Power Macintosh."

The first Power Macintoshes were hideously slow, slower than the computers they replaced. And they were more expensive, which just made things worse.

But, Apple persisted. They kept improving the hardware and tailoring the operating system to the new chips. Eventually, they hit a winning combination.

Power Macintosh 9600: the best Mac ever made (up to that point, and possibly ever.)

Power_Macintosh_9600_350-673x1024.jpg


By today's standards, it doesn't look like much. It's got a few 1990s touches like the big jelly-style power button and the sea-foam-green button at the top. But otherwise it's beige, beige, beige. But behind its boring interior was some of the best hardware design posibly ever.

Up front you had a floppy disk drive – this would be the last Apple computer to have one despite the fact that everyone still used them for years to come. There was room for a CD reader and a Zip drive, both critical must-haves for creatives. But the real design was inside. You'll need to watch the above video to really get an idea of it, but it was massively expandable, and the whole case came apart in a sort of weird origami that gave you complete access to the motherboard.

More importantly, this computer was an absolute speed demon at the time, thanks to speedy processors and the ability to load it up with a staggering amount of memory. If you wanted a tank of a computer that just plain worked, this was your box.

And then, Steve Jobs


Now don't get me wrong. I agree with the folks who say Steve Jobs' return saved Apple. Without him they'd still be relying on computer sales. But the moves he made from the beginning weren't real popular, at least not with me.

The Power Mac 9600 was really only available for about six months. It was replaced by a similar-looking box carrying the very first version of the PowerPC G3 chip. Like other first-version chips from IBM, it was initially a disaster and got better.

However, when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, he changed the course of the company's designs. Gone, he said, were the business-friendly good looks of the 1990s. They would be replaced with something flashy and fun. The stable and reliable OS 8 would be replaced with the weird and wonky OS 10 as soon as possible. (OS 9 was an interim step.)

What this meant was that Apple computers stopped looking like the 9600 and started looking like … this.

Apple_Yosemite-1024x819.jpg


They would also lose their internal floppy drives and a lot of their expandability. They gained something called "Firewire" which no one actually used for most of the time it was available. Like earlier Macs, the PowerPC G3-based systems would get better with time. They gave way to G4 and G5 versions that were even better than that. OS 10 (styled at the time as OS X) would get better too, but it would all take time. And then Apple threw it all away again by moving to Intel processors. But that's a story for another day.

Good design remains, trendy design doesn't


At the time it came out, the "Bondi" blue Mac was hailed as a bold design choice. Today it looks dated. It's a bright blue reminder of a design aesthetic we all would rather forget. I'm sure that some enthusiasts out there are still pining for one, but there aren't too many of them.

On the other hand, you can say that the beige Macs were boring, but you have to marvel at their quality and design. I don't know if I'd want one of these behemoths on my desk today, but if I had to have one I'd bet it wouldn't be as well built as the Power Macintosh 9600.

The post FUN FRIDAY: Power Macintosh 9600 appeared first on The Solid Signal Blog.

Continue reading...
0 Replies · 277 views
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 2 views
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
We have a Breakfast and Dinner thread so... :)
Continuing from the Breakfast thread, found Cornbread mix so ...
Yellow Cornbread Mix
2 Hatch Green Chiles -diced
1 Egg
2/3 cup of milk
add to greased pan
Bake for 400f 20-25 minutes(From instructions)
now to put together and try... this to go with pinto beans...
5449 Replies · 336091 views
TRG
TRG
Club sandwich and corn chowder. Iced tea.
dfergie
Chili dog bowl, water… (homemade chili)
TRG
TRG
Leftover wanton soup and pork fried rice. Water.
dfergie
IMG_5955.webp

Sweet tea…
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby and TRG
TRG
TRG
Tuna salad sandwich on toasted honey whole wheat bread with a handful of kettle chips. Water.
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68658 Replies · 2680237 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
I Wanna Talk About Me - Toby Keith
  • Like
Reactions: RaiderPower
Bobby
98.6 - Keith
harshness
I'm Easy - Keith Carridine
gms49ers
It's Easy - Boston
RaiderPower
Take It Easy On Me - Little River Band
  • Like
Reactions: dishstaller
R
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
Lately my eight year old Dell laptop has been shutting off even when I have a full battery. I have had to keep it plugged up all the time to keep this from happening. Any idea what is causing this? I replaced the battery about three years ago.
2 Replies · 49 views
arlo
A recalibration might be needed. Even if it shows full, the individual cells may have become unbalaced. And the BMS chip in the battery reports false information to the pc.
Try this. Start it up in the bios/uefi and leave it there until the battery dies and it shuts off.
It might just keep running longer than in Windows. Or run for a short while and shut off.
If it's the first case. Probably just needs a balancing. If the latter, the pack might just be dead.
Not throwing stones but perhaps just a cheaply constructed battery with substandard cells. Could be.

Patience. Keep restarting it in bios/uefi until it won't fire up anymore.
Then plug the charger in and let it complete a full charge. And see what happens. If it's better.
Do the same thing one more time. Run it until it dies dead-dead. Then just let it charge, pc shut off.
When charged, it might be better. It might not be.

There are bench jigs that read the actual BMS and override it to let a tech manually monitor and charge the separate packs. They can also reset any "time bombs" in it that cause an otherwise good pack to show bad.
Maybe Santa will be good to me some year.

You might just need a new battery. Maybe the PC power management chip is going. A Dell common thing.
Leaving a laptop plugged in with a full battery is known to reduce the life. Asus for one recommends that you don't leave the charger plugged in all of the time even when shut down. And setting Windows to charge the battery to 85% instead of 100% increases life.
That's all I got.
dishstaller
That's all I got.
That was quite enough....I definitely learned something from your post. Thanks
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Computers and Gadgets
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
5 Replies · 288 views
b4pjoe
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
If you can't get into the router to reserve an IP address just don't use DHCP on the device that needs connected and assign it to a specific IP address in the network settings.
  • Like
Reactions: harshness
HipKat
I set up a music server for my brother a few years ago. It's basically a small headless computer but it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
They are not. Your best bet is to set up a third-party router, attached to the Starlink for your server, that you can get into, like a Linksys, etc
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
…it needs to have a DHCP IP address reserved for it in the router settings. This was easy to do in his DSL router. He's switching to Starlink now and I was wondering if these setting are easily accessible in the Starlink router. I'm pretty sure he will be getting the latest V5 router.
The Starlink V5 Install Kit I just got comes with the Mini Router. It is pretty limited in what it can do. For example, it can provide only one IP subnet at a time, no Guest Network, but it does support the pass-thru to a third-party Router. You can also split the Wi-Fi into separate 5 GHz & 2.4 GHz SSIDs to help some IoT devices that don't support 5 GHz bands to work.

The larger Starlink Router that still comes with the V4 Kit does support a Guest Network with separate IPv4 Subnet, but it's $120 from Starlink. And it still won't do DHCP Reservations.
harshness
If you can restrict the DHCP address space to assign addresses to one end of the subnet (i.e. x.x.x.50+), you can manually assign the IP address on pretty much any operating system. This is a default behavior on several popular routers. As the Router Mini only supports 235 devices, I expect that's already done.

Another option is to use a router that supports PoE to power the antenna. This article discusses that option (under PoE Power heading):

  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Foxbat
Now that I've had the v5 kit with the Mini Router, it's not as bad as I first thought. Yes, no DHCP reservations, but you can set up multiple SSIDs that have separate IPv4 subnets, and like the big brother, you can select from 192.168.x.0/24 or 10.x.0.0/16 (where "x" is 1-4).

You can also split a subnet and have different SSIDs for the 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz channels to handle some IoT devices. I haven't discovered what subnet the 2nd NIC on the router assigns, I'm guessing it's the first subnet.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
2 Replies · 52 views
dishstaller
Sorry for posting the wrong link. Just corrected it.
dishstaller
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

2 Replies · 56 views
  • Sad
Reactions: Jimbo
Jimbo
Terrible tragedy. You would think that they would have safe guards in place that would prevent something like this from happening. I guess if you are going to ride in a passenger train it might be best to get a car near the rear.

They will have to look at the switching sections to determine WHY 2 trains were on the same track ... at the same time.
dishstaller
Thought this article might be of interest to some of you who might travel via train.