Social Feed

zippyfrog
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
· posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

This is an intersesting development. I already have Peacock ad-free for $16.99 on YouTube. With this partnership, since I already have YouTube Premium, it looks like I will get ad-supported Peacock for free. Makes me wonder if my $139.99 yearly deal for YouTube Premium will increase...
0 Replies · 0 views
osu1991
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
:clapping:cheer
CBS gives the go ahead for Captain Pike, Spock, Number One and The Enterprise to return in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds




895 Replies · 91521 views
meStevo
Dedrie Hall revealed at SDCC, recognizable for any Days of our lives fans. Will appear in a S4 episode.

1000002920.webp
long_time_DNC
Dedrie Hall revealed at SDCC, recognizable for any Days of our lives fans. Will appear in a S4 episode.

View attachment 192826
I'm clueless on who that is...
  • Like
Reactions: klang
MikeD-C05
I'm clueless on who that is...
She was on Days of Our Lives for years playing Marlena and she was possessed by the Devil for a long time on the show.:biggrin
days of our lives tango GIF

days of our lives GIF
Y
The writing was quite awful on that one. We've got these astronomy geniuses not grabbing the whole fifth planet thing. I think it would have been a much better episode (series of episodes) had they been stuck there for a while.
Dedrie Hall revealed at SDCC, recognizable for any Days of our lives fans. Will appear in a S4 episode.

View attachment 192826
Glad you said that. I would have confused her for Gates McFadden.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
meStevo
Soap Opera Legend, can't believe she's 78.

She's been on Days of our Lives for 50 years. Mom used to record it to VHS all week and watch it a day or two later. It went digital only and forced her to learn how to use streaming apps.

She was on Days of Our Lives for years playing Marlena and she was possessed by the Devil for a long time on the show.:biggrin
days of our lives tango GIF

days of our lives GIF

Yeah... Her levitating off the bed was a bridge too far for me as a kid lol.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/nostalgia/comments/17psm6f/dr_marlena_evans_deidre_hall_possessed_by_the/
  • Love
Reactions: MikeD-C05
long_time_DNC
Was never a soap watcher, except for a brief time waaaay back in college and a bunch of students would gather in the lounge to watch All My Children. I did that during lunch for a few months and decided there were better ways to spend lunch hour...
MikeD-C05
Was never a soap watcher, except for a brief time waaaay back in college and a bunch of students would gather in the lounge to watch All My Children. I did that during lunch for a few months and decided there were better ways to spend lunch hour...
I watched the three main soaps on ABC back in my 20s because I worked grave yards stocking and would watch them on my VCR in the afternoons when I got up after sleeping in the day. When I went to a dept. manager in the mornings, my buddy from the other department at Safeway and I would often go to eat at Mr. Ghatti's Pizza on our lunch break and they had a big box screen TV in the 80s we could watch the soap on which was All My Children at noon. "Tad the Cad" was our favorite soap guy. He was the shampoo guy at his birth mother's beauty shop and he seduced both mother Marion and her daughter Liza at the same time. Loved it when they both found out about the other.

Talk about "Love in the Afternoon" with Fireworks! :biggrin
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
Here we go again-

Comcast lost another 280,000 TV Subscribers, along with 167,000 internet customers.

12 Replies · 260 views
MikeD-C05
Maybe Cable companies should rethink their strategy to attract new customers and to keep them. The old plan of announcing new fees for things you never had before after you subscribe and hiking the price every 6 months to a year is not working. Or they could continue to circle down the drain till they go under. At this point I don't really care as long as there is competition that can provide you with their services at lower prices. :smug
dishdude
Maybe Cable companies should rethink their strategy to attract new customers and to keep them. The old plan of announcing new fees for things you never had before after you subscribe and hiking the price every 6 months to a year is not working. Or they could continue to circle down the drain till they go under. At this point I don't really care as long as there is competition that can provide you with their services at lower prices. :smug

A skinny bundle with minimal fees would probably get them a few more years, but the corporate conglomerates that own the networks won't allow it. They're going to milk every penny out of 3 FXs, 6 MTVs, 7 ESPNs...all playing content available on Pluto.
ncted
They're going to milk every penny out of 3 FXs, 6 MTVs, 7 ESPNs...all playing content available on Pluto.
ESPN is on Pluto?
Bruce
ESPN is on Pluto?
No, but the vast majority of content on Cable Channels, which is reruns, is on there, Tubi, Roku Channel, etc.

Which always makes me wonder, why people pay that average $140 a month to Satellite/Cable Providers.

When they can get the new programming that is on Network/Cable Channels, along with so much more new content (both scripted and sports), at a much reduced price on the streaming services, compared to Live TV Providers, along with the better video/sound quality.

Then use services like Pluto if they crave reruns, which are both live and on-demand.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
ncted
No, but the vast majority of content on Cable Channels, which is reruns, is on there, Tubi, Roku Channel, etc.

Which always makes me wonder, why people pay that average $140 a month to Satellite/Cable Providers.

When they can get the new programming that is on Network/Cable Channels, along with so much more new content (both scripted and sports), at a much reduced price on the streaming services, compared to Live TV Providers, along with the better video/sound quality.

Then use services like Pluto if they crave reruns, which are both live and on-demand.
As I've posted before here, the only thing left is local news and a few random events. I'd really like a locals-only streaming package. I'd be willing to pay $20/month for that.
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
As I've posted before here, the only thing left is local news and a few random events. I'd really like a locals-only streaming package. I'd be willing to pay $20/month for that.
Wonder why DISH doesn't do that anymore. I remember they used to provide locals by themselves and then they added an $5.00 access fee to that. But back then it was like $9.00 for everything. Then they came out with the Welcome pack and did away with the locals only pack. I think that was in the early 2000s because I got my Aunt to take satellite TV for just locals, since she can't get them in her area due to a mountain. But that was over 25 years ago.
dishdude
Wonder why DISH doesn't do that anymore. I remember they used to provide locals by themselves and then they added an $5.00 access fee to that. But back then it was like $9.00 for everything. Then they came out with the Welcome pack and did away with the locals only pack. I think that was in the early 2000s because I got my Aunt to take satellite TV for just locals, since she can't get them in her area due to a mountain. But that was over 25 years ago.

My favorite was when you could subscribe to the east and west network feeds for $4.99 each. iirc, with the superstations package it was $12.99 for all 3. Coming from cable that was really cool.
AZ.
AZ.
My favorite was when you could subscribe to the east and west network feeds for $4.99 each. iirc, with the superstations package it was $12.99 for all 3. Coming from cable that was really cool.
I remember that on C-band with my BUD.
MikeD-C05
My favorite was when you could subscribe to the east and west network feeds for $4.99 each. iirc, with the superstations package it was $12.99 for all 3. Coming from cable that was really cool.
That was why we went with DISH in 1997. The east/west locals + Super Stations. We were watching Star Trek Voyager on a regular channel in our area back in the 90s and then they quit showing it and the Supers had the show on UPN. Also we got the WB with Supernatural and Buffy the Vampire Slayer. So I loved this pack with all those stations back then.

When we had the WebTV/Dishplayer 7100 pvr we could record 2 locals off the east coast and 2 off the west coast and we could watch all 4 networks the next day. Now I have no use for even the CW since they gutted all the Super hero shows and Star trek has been gone for years.
Mister B
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
For years I have tried to get KRWG-TV from New Mexico State University (see my avatar). I could get a usable signal back in the analog days but when they went digital they moved their tower which is behind a tall mountain in my line of sight. I do get an occasional stable signal on some mornings if I turn my antenna that way but otherwise gave up on it long ago.
I was very excited when I read on their web site that they now provide an OTA signal for El Paso. However, when I dug into the technical details on rabbit ears I expected trouble when I read that they are using the same rf 23 as the main signal. Also, I am over 18 miles from the 3.15 KW transmitter.
Sure enough, when I scanned for new channels the signal breaks up continually and has only occasional audio. I am getting a signal strength of 92 but signal quality of only 10. This is with a moderate GE attic/outdoor antenna with clear line of sight to KFOX's tower (that KRWG is using in El Paso). I also tried the 4 bay antenna I put up for my neighbor at a higher 20 feet with the same results.
I suspect the problem to be that I get just enough of the main channel 23 to interfere with the local signal. Ten years ago I would have been tempted to try a higher and more directional antenna but I am a bit past that stage at this point. I also feel the chances of success are rather slim.
I wonder if KRWG wanted to use the same rf 23 or were forced into the situation as there are almost no empty slots on UHF in this area. I almost wish they hade used high VHF.
Do any members know of any area where these multi-transmitter set ups work well? They claim it will be feasible with ATSC 3.0 but I am not holding my breath for that.
I thought this would be interesting for members who frequent this site. Below is my rabbit ears report.

3 Replies · 44 views
M
You should be within range. They posted a article about coming online in El Paso just recently
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
comfortably_numb
I like New Mexico PBS here in Albuquerque, but I've seen KRWG on Directv when staying in hotels in southern Colorado and they have good programming. Ironic that they can't provide a translator here in the metro but if you have satellite you can get it anywhere in the state. They also have a livestream but you can't watch it unless your IP is located in their coverage area. A VPN would do it but I don't know of any VPN's with IP's in eastern NM.

Is there some sort of "lifeline" DTV Stream service that just offers locals?
M
I like New Mexico PBS here in Albuquerque, but I've seen KRWG on Directv when staying in hotels in southern Colorado and they have good programming. Ironic that they can't provide a translator here in the metro but if you have satellite you can get it anywhere in the state. They also have a livestream but you can't watch it unless your IP is located in their coverage area. A VPN would do it but I don't know of any VPN's with IP's in eastern NM.
The station just launched a translator in El Paso on Friday per news reports so maybe he tried before they launched it. He IS in the market so he can stream it. You are overthinking it.
KRWG should only be available in the El Paso market for Dish/Directv. They are not on satellite in Albuquerque per what I see nor nothing on Krwg website
Is there some sort of "lifeline" DTV Stream service that just offers locals?
No
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
67557 Replies · 2664372 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
long_time_DNC
Back Door - Kansas
H
BACK DOOR Angels-Jethro Tull
ClarkGable
Back In The USSR - The Beatles
harshness
Back In Black - AC/DC
  • Love
Reactions: FTA4PA
Bobby
Part Of Me That Needs You Most - Jay Black