First of all, thanks for the tip on HDNET b'casting a test pattern. That's good information.
Thanks for your recommendations on adjusting my TV. Rereading my post, I think I may have not painted the picture as best I could have. Here's my update.
I'm aware of "torch mode". My main HDTV is a JVC RPTV and I've made the adjustment from "Dynamic" (the default picture setting) to "Theater Pro". It took some time for my eyes to adjust, but I'm confident now that it's a better setting. Brightness, contrast, saturation and sharpness are all returned to decent settings and it's a warmer color temperature. However, it's in this Theater Pro mode that I still feel the black levels are poor. Here's why...
I adjusted my TV using Theater Pro as a starting point, then followed calibration directions from a THX DVD. JVC's Theater Mode nearly nailed every test on there. Maybe this kind of calibration is not appropriate for HD receivers, but watching DVDs and Dish SD after that was quite good (resolution of SD aside). Now that I have a 622 hooked up to it, SD is rather poor again, but I've not changed the TV picture's settings. Only the receiver has changed. My two biggest gripes are:
- Black levels are different for every channel (SD & HD)
- SD often has interlacing that never smooths out (like the CNBC static logo and the tickers crawling across the screen, for example.)
These are new issues for me going from my 501 receiver to the 622.
HD content (those that are truly 1920x1080) look amazing, aside from occasional black levels being inconsistent from station to station.
Lastly, I've explained everything above from the experience I've had with the 622 on my JVC RPTV. But I have nearly identical issues with my 211 on a Sharp Aquos LCD. Before this TV, it had Comcast cable running on it for five weeks. Black levels on the Comcast channels were a bit better than what I'm seeing now with the 211.
So, in review...
I'm going to take your advice and record the HDNET test pattern. Thanks for the headsup. I'll continue tweaking my settings to get what I like. But if this problem sounds familiar to anyone in the same boat and can see something that I'm missing during this transition from 501 to 622 & 211, let me know!
spike