I'm afraid your spelling may get you first.

"plagiarism"
I see you're keeping your opening statement, but omitted reference to your age. Have you considered that simple math is not the only basic fact check that could lead to questioning the motivation of the rest of your letter? (Hint: you're sending the letter to the holder of your subscriber records which will be seen when they log receipt of your letter.)
reoccurring --> recurring
Tivo --> TiVo
non existsance --> non-existenceHere you've used the subjective "I" as part of the object of "provide." The objective "me" is still correct even though "family and" has been added in front of it. A simple rule of thumb is to remove whatever has been paired with "I" or "me" and use whatever is correct in the remaining sentence.
Objective example: "Billy and me went to the store." Unless you would say "Me went to the store" that makes the correct sentence "Billy and I went to the store."
Subjective example: "Rick went to the store with Billy and I." Unless you would say "Rick went to the store with I" that makes the correct sentence "Rick went to the store with Billy and me."
I would suggest putting 2 commas (coma is a serious medical condition) surrounding the phrase, mainly to break up the long sentence: