Social Feed

Poke
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
http://www.tvpredictions.com/hdpredictions100306.htm

Swanni's 10 HDTV Predictions for 2007
Sony and Toshiba will reach an agreement on high-def DVDs; and the quality of your HD picture will emerge as a big issue.
Special to TVPredictions.com

Washington, D.C. (October 3, 2006) -- Editor's Note: Phillip Swann, president of TVPredictions.com, was scheduled to reveal his 10 HDTV predictions for 2007 at today's Iowa Digital TV Symposium in Des Moines, Iowa. However, Swann was unable to attend the conference due to the violent storms that hit the Chicago area on Tuesday and Wednesday morning. But here are his 10 predictions for high-def for the coming year -- and excerpts from his prepared remarks.

1. Sony and Toshiba will settle their HDTV DVD format war.
Swann: "The two formats are forcing consumers to the sidelines. People don't want to buy a new high-def DVD player -- whether it's Sony Blu-ray or Toshiba's HD-DVD -- because they are afraid of picking the wrong one. This is Beta vs. VHS all over again. Consequently, I predict that Sony and Toshiba will agree on a single format in 2007, which will spark greater interest in the new high-def players."

2. The XBox 360-Play Station 3 war will generate more interest in high-def DVDs.Swann: "The video game console battle will escalate in November of this year when Sony is scheduled to release its new Play Station 3, which will have a Blu-ray DVD player inside. In addition, Microsoft will then offer a HD-DVD/XBox 360 player attachment for $199. Because the video consoles are enormously popular, they will get more people interested and aware of the new high-def players. However, again, unless Sony and Toshiba reach an agreement on a single format, the interest will not translate into buys."

3. HDTV prices will drop even more dramatically next year.
Swann: "LCD and Plasma TV flat-screen prices will fall another 30 percent in 2007. You can expect to see 42-inch flat-screen HDTVs for under $1,000 by the 2007 holidays."

4. The HDTV picture quality will become a big issue in the battle between cable and satellite TV operators.
Swann: "More high-def owners are becomingly aware that cable and satellite operators sometime squeeze the HD picture quality to make room for more channels and services. And those high-def owners are getting angrier about the practice. In 2007, cable and satellite operators will be less likely to do this because they will have more system and satellite space, respectively, to transmit the high-def signals. However, look for the operators to boast that they offer the best HD picture in their advertising campaigns."

5. The rollout of 1080p TVs will further the battle over which programming format offers the best picture. And it will create more confusion in the marketplace.
Swann: "1080i. 720p. And now 1080p. Networks and TV makers have been saying their particular programming format offers the best picture. (For instance, ABC broadcasts in 720p while NBC uses 1080i.) The tech talk has confused consumers and the introduction of 1080p will just further that confusion."

6. Multicasting will continue to die a slow death.
Swann: "Many local stations are offering additional digital channels with their primary high-def feed. However, Congress (and the FCC) is unlikely to support proposals that would force cable operators to carry the multiple digital feeds, known as multicasting. Consequently, look for fewer stations to offer the multiple digital channels."

7. There will be an explosion of local stations switching to high-def news broadcasts.
Swann: "There are now only about 15 stations that are broadcasting their local news programs in high-def. But that number will rise to several dozen in 2007."

8. New HD-dedicated channels will launch in 2007.
Swann: "Until now, most high-def channels have been simulcasts of the analog network, such as HBO HD and the high-def feeds of the broadcast networks. The exceptions: HDNet and INHD, both of which do not have analog channels. However, with high-def sales rising fast, look for more companies to launch channels that are specifically created for the high-def audience."

9. There will be a boom in commercials produced in HDTV.
Swann: "Advertisers have been reluctant to spend the time and money on producing their commercials in high-def. However, in 2007, the high-def audience will likely grow to well over 20 million. With that number, it will be worth the investment to produce more ads in HD."

10. DIRECTV will become the HDTV leader.Swann: "I predicted this would happen in 2006, but DIRECTV has decided to postpone its national high-def expansion until the second quarter of 2007. So, look for DIRECTV to dramatically increase its national high-def lineup in 2007, offering more channels than any other provider






Only thing I disagree with is #10! Direct might have more locals in HD but not more national networks.. Overall Dish will still be the leader..
26 Replies · 4100 views
rad
rad
I do think he's going to be right on #10 in 2007, unless both D10 and D11 fail. With all that bandwidth D* will finally have the capacity to add national HD channels, if they don't they'll be pulling the biggest business boner in a long time. Now the $64,000 question is will D* put all this new capacity to good use and go back to full resolution/bandwidth on HD channels or continue to put the squeeze on those channels?
Tom Bombadil
I predict that Swanni will be quoted by a major media source in 2007 and his head will swell up so much that it will burst.
B
Jeff_R said:
Forget about the Voom channels, I don't think D* will add those. However, think about a suite of Fox HD channels. They already have the Fox Movie Channel, now if they made a suite of movie channels catered to HD, as well as a few other channels full of FOX content, it could be a significant package of channels. Think of all of the 20th Century Fox TV programs that there have been over the year. Not just Fox Network, but all of the other network programming that Fox actually owns and sells to the big 3 for first run. Plus their syndicated programming.

Why do you think we haven't seen the "FX-HD" channel. They are waiting to launch a suite of channels exclusive to D*. Swanni can take that as a prediction if he'd like. :D

If this News Corp-owned "Fox Suite" is distributed by satellite (C-band), they would have to make it available (for a price) to any cable or sat company - it can't be exclusive. Comcast gets around this rule for its Philadelphia sports net by staying on land lines.

If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me. ;)

Brad
J
Bradtothebone said:
If this News Corp-owned "Fox Suite" is distributed by satellite (C-band), they would have to make it available (for a price) to any cable or sat company - it can't be exclusive. Comcast gets around this rule for its Philadelphia sports net by staying on land lines.

If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me. ;)

Brad

That is correct, and they would have to make them available. However, if the Voom pack isn't being offered, I'm not sure that a Fox suite would be, either. It would be bragging rights for D*.

I can't imagine that it would be 100 channels, but a nice little suite would be a nice addition from Fox. They have had TV programs for a long time, and a really good libary of movies as well.
Juan
Scott Greczkowski said:
Yes Swan's predictions are lame, hell if you read here at SatelliteGuys daily (like Swani does) you would know most if not all of what Swan reports anyways (and usually a long time before he reports it)

However with that said, I must give him credit, his interviews as of late have been good. And I do hope he continues with them.
Whats his forum name? (maybe that should be pub info)
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
I was reading this article


That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.


Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.
918 Replies · 73451 views
  • Wow
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Bruce
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
Jimbo
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.
That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.
Bruce
That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.
Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?
AZ.
AZ.
Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?
Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need a old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.
Bruce
Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need an old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.
Bobby
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.
Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.
AZ.
AZ.
Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.
Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.
TRG
TRG
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees. :devilish :biggrin
Bruce
Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.
Jimbo
People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees. :devilish :biggrin
Not Me, I rather enjoy it ...
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: TRG and Foxbat
Jimbo
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.
Quick Question, WITHOUT Looking it up ...
Who played in the World Series last year ?
Jimbo
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.
True, but you had 2 Large Markets in it .
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Bruce
Quick Question, WITHOUT Looking it up ...
Who played in the World Series last year ?
Two MLB teams.
Jimbo
Two MLB teams.
Now, having low numbers this past year doesn't surprise me at all, you had 2 teams that don't like to spend tons of money and they are not your Large markets.
TRG
TRG
Not Me, I rather enjoy it ...
I thought you might like that. :biggrin
Jimbo
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.
I guess they should figure that out ... maybe not offer as much if they can't afford it next time.
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
162 Replies · 4008 views
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat and meStevo
dfergie
Tried to watch the truck race but the stage c**p is why I don't watch NASCAR anymore…
  • Like
Reactions: Yespage
Y
Today is the anniversary of Dan Wheldon's passing at Las Vegas in a dreadful crash that luckily didn't take more drivers' lives. I vaguely remember the crash, but I more strongly remember Paul Tracy trying to keep it together as he left the Medical Center knowing that Dan most likely wasn't going to.

The safety in these vehicles is beyond incomprehensible, especially relative to what it was 60 years ago, when dying wasn't unexpected. But it is still very dangerous. I always scoff at the prayer invocations, but never scoff at the risks these drivers take and the emergency workers out there who might need to pull short of a miracle to save a driver's life.
Tried to watch the truck race but the stage c**p is why I don't watch NASCAR anymore…
HBO Max has the live in car streaming without commercials, which provides an interesting take, but you are driving blind, knowing only what the team is telling the driver about what is happening on the track. The stages definitely ruin the NASCAR set up.
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
Y
NASCAR is an abject mess, but at least it has Kyle Larson. Guy had the lead on the green/white checker, fell back to 12th or the like, kept his cool, and charged back to win with room to spare at the line. And win very cleanly!

NASCAR needs to stop racing at Talladega. Especially if they are going for elderly Sunday drives at the track! Stage racing is real stupid, but NASCAR should consider one half point a second per group gap as a bonus.
Foxbat
Congratulations to the youngest Formula 1 World Champion, 20-year old Kimi Antonelli! The podium at the Mexican Grand Prix featured three World Champions with 4-time World Champion Max Verstappen, 7-time World Champion Lewis Hamilton, and newly-crowned World Champion Kimi Antonelli. A dozen World Championships represented!
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 6 views
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68800 Replies · 2689542 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
Don't Look Back - Boston
harshness
Please Come to Boston - Dave Loggins
Bobby
Come A Little Bit Closer - Jay and the Americans
sdfntx
Closer to You - Brandi Carlile
long_time_Dish
(They Long To Be) Close To You -The Carpenters
  • Love
Reactions: RaiderPower
Lon.TV
Last reply · posted in Lon.TV
3 Replies · 178 views
R
Well, ATSC 3 is a flop
TRG
TRG
So in other words, corporate greed is more important than public safety. :mad:
b4pjoe
So in other words, corporate greed is more important than public safety. :mad:
At least for a couple more years
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 10 views
jamieh1
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV Programming Forum
DIRECTV Stream/Internet added Ch 4105 SportsGrid
269 Replies · 39493 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand and KyL416
K
Now live:
4101 Yahoo! Sports Network
4121 DP World Tour
4195 F1 Channel
4196 MotoGP Channel
K
Now live:
4275 Law & Crime
4364 Military Makeover Channel
K
Game Show Central is now live on channel 4342
K
Now live:
4101 Yahoo! Sports Network
4121 DP World Tour
4195 F1 Channel
4196 MotoGP Channel
It only took them 41 days to announce it
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony
K
A new exclusive FAST channel called "DIRECTV Sportside" is testing
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Tony