Indivdual siting needs and satellite internet consultation
I know a lot of this discussion has focused on Skyway as a cheaper alternative. I am in a different situation. My husband and I are professionals and wanted high speed internet that works. We paid quite a lot to get Wildblue going 3 years ago, and it has been terribly slow most of the time. I don't know how much of this is the dish being installed at the bottom of the roof, whether there were trees in the way, and the local fog. But I often had no connection on sunny days as well as foggy days, lots of dropped connections. Increasingly, the days when it was running well were the exception rather than the rule. Time is money, and I got tired of spending so much time on the phone with Wildblue, and the problem not really getting fixed. We bought the best package Skyway has to offer, and it is working great. I hope it continues this way. I don't think that there is one satellite internet company that works best for rural folks everywhere. I think the topography, potential installation sites, customer needs, weather, and location in relationship to the various satellites make the difference on which is best.
Given the cost of installation and long-term contracts, I think there is a market for professional consultation from those with expertise in the various systems with no vested interest in one company or the other. Someone who could look at line of site, knows potential problems related to topography and weather, and could give an opinion on which satellite internet company would work best, if any.
Is this at all realistic?
Cori