Social Feed

C
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
If you have a situation where more elevation with your dish would make satellite reception possible that at the moment is otherwise not possible because of obstructions from trees, buildings, etc., here is a great piece of information that should help some of you folks enjoy some more TV.

It comes complete with text and pictures for all you Wisconsin and Minnesota people. :hatsoff: :)
Certainly worth printing out.

Because of the much higher elevation of dish ( flipped 180 degrees from original offset) a hole should be drilled in reflector for rain drainage. Also, extra care for weather proofing of LNBF ports.

Go to - http://www.bbrv.dreamstation.com/sat.html

If anyone puts this information to use, let us know how it turned out for you.
13 Replies · 6947 views
I
Works great... except you have to turn the tv upside down!
C
Works great... except you have to turn the tv upside down!

Yes, and also while sitting upside down, it's hard to drink that cold one. :D
S
Yes, and also while sitting upside down, it's hard to drink that cold one. :D
It's obvious you are drinking to slow. Just cock your head back and pour!:D

I don't know if saying "getting more elevation" is accurate, but it does provide extra possibilities for changing the local setup to receive a signal below a over-hang, above a railing, between or maybe under some trees.

But the best part - it's easier to mount on the luggage rack of my Expedition. :eureka
digiblur
It's obvious you are drinking to slow. Just cock your head back and pour!:D

I don't know if saying "getting more elevation" is accurate, but it does provide extra possibilities for changing the local setup to receive a signal below a over-hang, above a railing, between or maybe under some trees.

But the best part - it's easier to mount on the luggage rack of my Expedition. :eureka

I wish I was drinking. It's kinda like if you are looking in the binoculars but you can see your neighbors bedroom window because of the tree. Are you going to turn the binoculars upside down to see in the window. No..you are still in the same spot..looking at the same spot. As in, "You can't get there from here."
S
However, while drinking some of that "Bayou Beer", if the tree is in front of you so that you are only seeing through one lens, then you lean a little to the left (using the LSU kicker*), or you turn the binoculars sideways so that one lens is on top of the other so that both lens will have a view.:D

So technically, you're not in the same spot, with either the binoculars or the dish with a non-traditional mount.

Kind of like when I take a Dish 500 with single LNBF, and adjust the skew to receive a stronger signal, since I can not get way beyond the balcony to get a proper line of sight.

* Can't remember the name of the LSU kicker who tried to commit suicide a few years ago, but he was a little too far to the left and missed.:D
C
I wish I was drinking. It's kinda like if you are looking in the binoculars but you can see your neighbors bedroom window because of the tree. Are you going to turn the binoculars upside down to see in the window. No..you are still in the same spot..looking at the same spot. As in, "You can't get there from here."

Your thoughts here will hold true with a prime focus LNBF. But we are working with an off-set LNBF and the example that I have presented here allows for the reflector to be angled higher in the sky with relation to its base and still look at the same satellite position thus giving a little more look see over a foreground object that may have been obstructing.
It allows for more of the dish area to capture and reflect to its focal point with the foreground obstruction.

I agree my choice of the word elevation could be misleading.
digiblur
However, while drinking some of that "Bayou Beer", if the tree is in front of you so that you are only seeing through one lens, then you lean a little to the left (using the LSU kicker*), or you turn the binoculars sideways so that one lens is on top of the other so that both lens will have a view.:D

So technically, you're not in the same spot, with either the binoculars or the dish with a non-traditional mount.

Kind of like when I take a Dish 500 with single LNBF, and adjust the skew to receive a stronger signal, since I can not get way beyond the balcony to get a proper line of sight.

* Can't remember the name of the LSU kicker who tried to commit suicide a few years ago, but he was a little too far to the left and missed.:D

Or you just get mad and throw the satellite dish 100 yards with 3-250lb blockers hanging off of your hips.... just like JaMarcus Russell. ;)
Foxbat
Supporting Founder Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
· posted in Computers and Gadgets
Hmmm, Apple iCloud appears to be missing from the Internet. Attempting to connect yields:
1794355836427.webp
Plus, lots of prompts to enter my iCloud credentials.
1794356039809.webp​
0 Replies · 2 views
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
I was reading this article


That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.


Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.
918 Replies · 73461 views
  • Wow
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Bruce
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Simmons
Jimbo
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.
That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.
Bruce
That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.
Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?
AZ.
AZ.
Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?
Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need a old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.
Bruce
Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need an old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.
Bobby
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.
Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.
AZ.
AZ.
Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.
Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.
TRG
TRG
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees. :devilish :biggrin
Bruce
Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.
Jimbo
People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees. :devilish :biggrin
Not Me, I rather enjoy it ...
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: TRG and Foxbat
Jimbo
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.
Quick Question, WITHOUT Looking it up ...
Who played in the World Series last year ?
Jimbo
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.
True, but you had 2 Large Markets in it .
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Bruce
Quick Question, WITHOUT Looking it up ...
Who played in the World Series last year ?
Two MLB teams.
Jimbo
Two MLB teams.
Now, having low numbers this past year doesn't surprise me at all, you had 2 teams that don't like to spend tons of money and they are not your Large markets.
TRG
TRG
Not Me, I rather enjoy it ...
I thought you might like that. :biggrin
Jimbo
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.
I guess they should figure that out ... maybe not offer as much if they can't afford it next time.
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
162 Replies · 4009 views
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat and meStevo
dfergie
Tried to watch the truck race but the stage c**p is why I don't watch NASCAR anymore…
  • Like
Reactions: Yespage
Y
Today is the anniversary of Dan Wheldon's passing at Las Vegas in a dreadful crash that luckily didn't take more drivers' lives. I vaguely remember the crash, but I more strongly remember Paul Tracy trying to keep it together as he left the Medical Center knowing that Dan most likely wasn't going to.

The safety in these vehicles is beyond incomprehensible, especially relative to what it was 60 years ago, when dying wasn't unexpected. But it is still very dangerous. I always scoff at the prayer invocations, but never scoff at the risks these drivers take and the emergency workers out there who might need to pull short of a miracle to save a driver's life.
Tried to watch the truck race but the stage c**p is why I don't watch NASCAR anymore…
HBO Max has the live in car streaming without commercials, which provides an interesting take, but you are driving blind, knowing only what the team is telling the driver about what is happening on the track. The stages definitely ruin the NASCAR set up.
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
Y
NASCAR is an abject mess, but at least it has Kyle Larson. Guy had the lead on the green/white checker, fell back to 12th or the like, kept his cool, and charged back to win with room to spare at the line. And win very cleanly!

NASCAR needs to stop racing at Talladega. Especially if they are going for elderly Sunday drives at the track! Stage racing is real stupid, but NASCAR should consider one half point a second per group gap as a bonus.
Foxbat
Congratulations to the youngest Formula 1 World Champion, 20-year old Kimi Antonelli! The podium at the Mexican Grand Prix featured three World Champions with 4-time World Champion Max Verstappen, 7-time World Champion Lewis Hamilton, and newly-crowned World Champion Kimi Antonelli. A dozen World Championships represented!
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 8 views
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68800 Replies · 2689555 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
Don't Look Back - Boston
harshness
Please Come to Boston - Dave Loggins
Bobby
Come A Little Bit Closer - Jay and the Americans
sdfntx
Closer to You - Brandi Carlile
long_time_Dish
(They Long To Be) Close To You -The Carpenters
  • Love
Reactions: RaiderPower
Lon.TV
Last reply · posted in Lon.TV
3 Replies · 180 views
R
Well, ATSC 3 is a flop
TRG
TRG
So in other words, corporate greed is more important than public safety. :mad:
b4pjoe
So in other words, corporate greed is more important than public safety. :mad:
At least for a couple more years
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 12 views