Social Feed

ckpuma

Last reply Jan 30, 2007 · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

adding 2nd TV to 622

Sorry, I don't mean to ask stupid questions, but I tried and I tried to add a second Tv to my 622 and it doesn't happen. I ran the coax, got the CABLE channel on the second TV (100) (BTW the CABLE channel selection on my 1st Tv is 102???) and i could see the program guide, but no picture. The receiver is in dual mode it's on a ENABLE shared view. At some point I could see (on the 2nd TV) a message that it is ACQUIRING a satellite signal, but it wasn't going nowhere.
One more thing, on the OUTPUT menu I have 2 XX (red squares) under 2nd output.

I have a dual DISH 500 and get 100 strength on 110 and 119.

Help.

14 Replies · 3761 views

Load Replies (14) Reply Legacy View

ckpuma

Jan 30, 2007

Thank you, and yes, I only have one dish for now, so the HD programming is still in the works for me. I just got the receiver a few days ago and am anxious to see what it is capable of.
Here's how I have the connections in my newly finished house. Again dual DISH 500 with 2 coax cables running into two separate rooms in the house. I only use one of the wall outlets to connect the 622, to connect it to my plasma and then I ran another coax to the TV2. What did I do wrong? Thank you for the enlightment. I'm a very new to this as you can see.

ckpuma

Jan 30, 2007

... and they are connected using the dish separator, that came with the 622. I DO NOT have DishPro Plus Twin LNB, though. Wondering if this is the issue.

Dish VIP

Jan 30, 2007

ckpuma said:
Thank you, and yes, I only have one dish for now, so the HD programming is still in the works for me. I just got the receiver a few days ago and am anxious to see what it is capable of.
Here's how I have the connections in my newly finished house. Again dual DISH 500 with 2 coax cables running into two separate rooms in the house. I only use one of the wall outlets to connect the 622, to connect it to my plasma and then I ran another coax to the TV2. What did I do wrong? Thank you for the enlightment. I'm a very new to this as you can see.

No problem. First let me clarify one thing for you. There are duals and there are twins with regard to the LNBF on your dish. A "Dual" has one "eye" but is called a dual because it has two outputs. A "Twin" has two "eyes" and also two outputs. Seems backwards, and it is, but that is the teminology E* (Echostar) has given us and that is what we work with.

Now that we know what a "Twin" is, I will assume that is what is on you dish. However, to add confusion, a "Twin" comes in three flavors: Legacy, DishPro (DP), and DishProPlus (DPPlus). We can rule out the legacy because that is old and will never work with a 622 receiver. That leave DP Twin or DPPlus Twin. We need to determine if you have one or the other.

The back (side away from reflector) will say "DP" or "DP Plus". The physical difference is that a DP Twin has two outputs and a DPPlus Twin has a third port to input a third orbital slot. The technical difference is what is important here. That is, each output (thus each cable) from a DP Twin can support only one tuner, whereas each output from a DPPlus Twin can support two tuners, but only with the use of a "seperator" that came with your 622 to split the single cable into two for the two tuner inputs on your receiver. Whew!

In short a DP Twin would need BOTH cables to go to your 622 and a DPPlus Twin only needs one with the use of the seperator. So, which do you have and we can go from there.

P.S. Delete the other thread if noone has yet replied.

RandallA

Jan 30, 2007

Threads should be merged.

"I DO NOT have DishPro Plus Twin LNB, though. Wondering if this is the issue."

You can't use a regular DP Twin with a separator. You need a DPP Twin.

SmityWhity

Jan 30, 2007

ckpuma said:
... and they are connected using the dish separator, that came with the 622. I DO NOT have DishPro Plus Twin LNB, though. Wondering if this is the issue.

Assuming the coax from the dish to the room outlets are suitable, and since you are in a hurry to see what the ViP 622 can do, here's what I would do.

Get a piece of coax to go from the other room to your ViP 622.
Remove the DP Separator from the system.
Connect one outlet to Sat 1 Input.
Connect other outlet to Sat 2 Input.
Make sure receiver is set for Dual Mode.
Plug it all in and run a Check Switch = Menu, 6, 1, 1, Check Switch.

NOTE: If your 622 has not tried to take a software download yet, it may try to. If so, let it do the download.

ckpuma

Jan 30, 2007

Thank you so much for the very professional and quick replies. Seems like I have to get me a DishPlus Pro Twin switch since the one I have is palin DishPro twin. In the mean time, I'll follow the instructions from SmityWhity and explore the wonderful world of my new 622.

SmityWhity

Jan 30, 2007

Seems like I have to get me a DishPlus Pro Twin switch since the one I have is palin DishPro twin.

Probably a typo, but an incorrect statement.

(1) You can replace your DP Twin LNBF with a $45.00 DPP Twin LNBF. This will allow you to run a single cable from the DPP Twin LNBF directly to a DP Separator which will provide two sat feeds to a dual tuner receiver.

The DPP Twin will allow you to add 1 more DBS satellite location such as 129 or 61.5 for High Definition programming, or 148 for west coast programming.
See http://www.dishstore.net/product_info.php?cPath=40&products_id=229

Or

(2) You can keep what you have, and buy a $180.00 DishPro Plus 44 Switch (DPP44). Connect 2 cables from your DP Twin to Port 1 and Port 2 of the DPP44. Then you can feed the ViP 622 with a single cable when using the DP Separator.

The DPP44 Switch will allow you to add 2 more satellite locations.
See http://www.dishstore.net/product_info.php?cPath=40&products_id=160

View all replies (14)

Foxbat

Supporting Founder Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 3 minutes ago · posted in Computers and Gadgets

Apple Appears to be Down

Hmmm, Apple iCloud appears to be missing from the Internet. Attempting to connect yields:

Plus, lots of prompts to enter my iCloud credentials.

1 Replies · 11 views

Load Replies (1) Reply Legacy View

klang

3 minutes ago

I'm not seeing any issues.

Scott Greczkowski

Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge

Last reply 4 minutes ago · posted in The Chit Chat Club

Song Name Game Part 3!

Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne

Get it?

An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....

68802 Replies · 2689572 views

Load Replies (68802) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: c-spand

Bobby

Today at 10:58 AM

Come A Little Bit Closer - Jay and the Americans

Reactions: ClarkGable, RaiderPower, EatMyVolts and 2 others

sdfntx

Today at 11:50 AM

Closer to You - Brandi Carlile

long_time_Dish

Today at 3:53 PM

(They Long To Be) Close To You -The Carpenters

Reactions: ClarkGable and RaiderPower

ClarkGable

27 minutes ago

You Light Up My Life - Debby Boone

long_time_Dish

4 minutes ago

Little Bit Of Light - Strange Weather

View all replies (68802)

ewindowman

Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 7 minutes ago · posted in DISH Network Support Forum

Dish Bankruptcy - Business as Usual

Looks like dish is Bankrupt. Filling tomorrow Tuesday June 30th

475 Replies · 16988 views

Load Replies (475) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Foxbat, FTA4PA and LQQK

ERSanders

Today at 10:52 AM

The short term financial thinking by MBAs is what killed Xerox. Ask me how I know!

Reactions: Redbullsnation, charlesrshell and comfortably_numb

navychop

Today at 11:09 AM

So you have a MBA?
:devilish

Reactions: charlesrshell

Juan

Today at 11:35 AM

ERSanders said:
The short term financial thinking by MBAs is what killed Xerox. Ask me how I know!

I thought it was when Bill Gates stole DOS

Reactions: Almighty1, gms49ers, Redbullsnation and 1 other person

dishdude

Today at 11:35 AM

Juan said:
I thought it was when Bill Gates stole DOS

And Steve Jobs stole the mouse and GUI

Reactions: Almighty1, MikeD-C05, Redbullsnation and 1 other person

ERSanders

Today at 12:47 PM

ERSanders said:
The short term financial thinking by MBAs is what killed Xerox. Ask me how I know!

Actually I survived despite them for 31 years and two expait assignments. But the quest for the current quarter's profits doomed long term vision, planning and actions.

Reactions: Almighty1, MikeD-C05, charlesrshell and 1 other person

Strega

7 minutes ago

Juan said:
I thought it was when Bill Gates stole DOS

He bought that for $50,000. What he bought was originally called QDOS (Quick and Dirty Operating System) from Seattle Computer Products which was designed to be similar to CP/M - an OS for the Intel 8080. Seems like a decent investment. ;-)

There have been claims that the original developer of QDOS stole CP/M code and according to legend there is some command that you can type into MS-DOS that makes it print the name of the developer of CP/M, thus proving theft, but no one seems to know what that command actually is. ;-)

Reactions: charlesrshell

View all replies (475)

Bruce

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply 23 minutes ago · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

Traditional/Streaming Live TV Providers Losses, 3rd Quarter 2026 Edition

Comcast is the first to report, with a massive 274,000 loss in video subscribers.

In the 3Q of 2016, Comcast had 21.42 million video subscribers and was the #1 provider, now at 10.39 million and is the #3 Provider, YTTV is #2 ( who also surpassed DirecTV-8 Million and Dish-under 5 Million), Charter/Spectrum is #1.

Comcast Just Lost 274,000 TV Customers & 144,000 Internet Customers In Just Three Months | Cord Cutters News

Comcast Corporation reported its third-quarter 2026 results on October 22, showing continued erosion in its domestic residential broadband internet and video customer bases as competitive pressures intensified across the connectivity market. The company recorded a net loss of 144,000 domestic...

cordcuttersnews.com

42 Replies · 1588 views

Load Replies (42) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Howard Simmons

reubenray

Yesterday at 1:09 PM

In my area Cox (now Spectrum) has run everything underground instead of on poles.

Reactions: MikeD-C05

Jimbo

Yesterday at 5:19 PM

reubenray said:
In my area Cox (now Spectrum) has run everything underground instead of on poles.

Thats good, the neighborhood generally look better with buried plant ... until someone puts a shovel into the line planting the Spring Garden.

Reactions: MikeD-C05 and reubenray

Bobby

Yesterday at 6:25 PM

Jimbo said:
Thats good, the neighborhood generally look better with buried plant ... until someone puts a shovel into the line planting the Spring Garden.

In my local area all underground utilities are under the sidewalk. Of course from there, when entering your property, They are at least 18" in your dirt.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 7:25 PM

Bobby said:
In my local area all underground utilities are under the sidewalk. Of course from there, when entering your property, They are at least 18" in your dirt.

I bet MOST of them are NOT 18", they may suppose to be, but I doubt they are .

Edison is definitely deep enough, but thats the only one ...

brice52

Yesterday at 7:39 PM

Jimbo said:
Thats good, the neighborhood generally look better with buried plant ... until someone puts a shovel into the line planting the Spring Garden.

My fiber isp put everything in conduit, except for the drop line to the NID and it it buried 10 inches

Reactions: Jimbo

reubenray

Yesterday at 7:41 PM

Jimbo said:
Thats good, the neighborhood generally look better with buried plant ... until someone puts a shovel into the line planting the Spring Garden.

My area is very rocky, so there will be no shovels into the lines. Most of the lines were bored and the one's not bored where dug at least 18" deep. Cox had flagged my yard for them to dig up. But the foreman of the crew said he was not going to tear up my grass. He ended up installing the cable across the street at a vacant lot instead and bored the street for my pedestal. The line from the pedestal to my house could be damaged being it is fairly shallow.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 7:42 PM

brice52 said:
My fiber isp put everything in conduit, except for the drop line to the NID and it it buried 10 inches

Really, you Lucky Dog !

Do you Work for that ISP ? :biggrin

Bobby

Yesterday at 8:49 PM

Jimbo said:
I bet MOST of them are NOT 18", they may suppose to be, but I doubt they are .

Edison is definitely deep enough, but thats the only one ...

I did the underground trench utility designs for 9 years. Gas and electric were 24". Telephone and CATV were 18". These were for new construction. Add on construction could be anywhere. All of the utilities went from their terminal points to a common utility point on the house. They were in a single trench.

Jimbo said:
So, if theres a issue with any buried line, the sidewalk needs to be dug up as well ???
That sucks.

Sometimes…. electric and CATV are in conduit so replacement is pretty easy. Telephone, specifically Pacific Telephone, Pacific Bell, SBC, ATT are direct buried and use encap termination directly onto the feed cable. That is always a sidewalk digup.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 10:20 PM

Bobby said:
I did the underground trench utility designs for 9 years. Gas and electric were 24". Telephone and CATV were 18". These were for new construction. Add on construction could be anywhere. All of the utilities went from their terminal points to a common utility point on the house. They were in a single trench.

Sometimes…. electric and CATV are in conduit so replacement is pretty easy. Telephone, specifically Pacific Telephone, Pacific Bell, SBC, ATT are direct buried and use encap termination directly onto the feed cable. That is always a sidewalk digup.

Ok, your talking in the right of way ...
I thought you were talking about from the ped to the houses.

Fortunately you don't usually get Cable cuts Under a sidewalk, usually its when a Construction crew us digging with major equipment.

The drops to the house are not going to be very deep, sometimes barely under the sod. 6" is a godsend.

osu1991

Yesterday at 10:48 PM

I'm fortunate to have 3 fiber providers now.

Cox and T mobile bored and put conduit in before pulling the fiber thru the easement in my neighborhood . Windstream Kinetic I can't remember if they pulled conduit first or not. I remember they didn't have a boring machine when they came thru my yard, they used that for the mainline crossing under the street but had a vibratory plow in my backyard. I remember seeing some blue conduit just don't remember where it was being used. Windstream barely put the fiber run from the pedestal to my house about 2 inches underground. Landscaper hit it while putting landscaping around the pedestal they added to my yard. I made sure they buried it at least 12 inches when they replaced it.

AEP/ PSO the electric company has their main distribution lines running on poles along the back of my property. Cox has their main distribution line hung on those poles before going underground through the neighborhood.

I'm in the middle of a damage claim and about to take them to court as insurance is trying to get out of it claiming the lines were too low. Had an oversized load get lost and try to turn around in an older neighborhood. Pulled down 5 blocks of fiber with separate fiber lines belonging to the city, Cox/Spectrum and ATT.

brice52

23 minutes ago

reubenray said:
My area is very rocky, so there will be no shovels into the lines. Most of the lines were bored and the one's not bored where dug at least 18" deep. Cox had flagged my yard for them to dig up. But the foreman of the crew said he was not going to tear up my grass. He ended up installing the cable across the street at a vacant lot instead and bored the street for my pedestal. The line from the pedestal to my house could be damaged being it is fairly shallow.

No, but it is a coop. I am just a member and subscriber

Jimbo said:
Really, you Lucky Dog !

Do you Work for that ISP ?

View all replies (42)

Bruce

Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter

Last reply Today at 6:46 PM · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum

How things have changed

I was reading this article

Cable TV ‘cord-cutters’ became the majority in 2022

The steady decline of cable and broadcast television, and the rise of streaming services, reached a sort of inflection point over the past year. Last summer, for the first time, streaming ser…

thehill.com

That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.

Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.

918 Replies · 73467 views

Load Replies (918) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: MikeD-C05

Bruce

Yesterday at 5:36 AM

According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

Reactions: Howard Simmons

Jimbo

Yesterday at 8:00 AM

Bruce said:
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.

Reactions: MikeD-C05, Howard Simmons, dishstaller and 1 other person

Bruce

Yesterday at 8:17 AM

Jimbo said:
That thier own stupidity ...

They make it hard to find the game when its on FOX 1 game, then FS1, then on Tru or some other little ity biyy channel that people rerely watch and can't find. (I don't know if FOX is TRU or not, but thats what I'm saying, they put games on obscure channels and expect people to easily find it and watch.

Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?

Reactions: Howard Simmons, ncted, Bobby and 1 other person

AZ.

Yesterday at 8:25 AM

Bruce said:
Every WS game was on the main Fox Broadcast Channel, what are you referring to?

Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need a old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and Jimbo

Bruce

Yesterday at 11:08 AM

AZ. said:
Throughout the playoffs most games were not over the air. They were on FS1 or TrueTV, HBO, TBS....So without a sports package you need FS1, and the others you need an old school TV package. If I had to guess, close to 75% of playoff games were not on free local TV.

But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and AZ.

Bobby

Yesterday at 11:20 AM

Bruce said:
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.

Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.

Reactions: Howard Simmons and Foxbat

AZ.

Yesterday at 1:09 PM

Bobby said:
Last year it was the Dodgers and Bluejays. This year is was the Brewers and the Rays, two teams that never won a World Series. Last year the Dodgers were the former year champion, can they do a repeat against a Toronto team that looked unbeatable. That World Series was a classic between two teams that really wanted it. The highlight of this year was can Milwaukee go 4-0 like they did to the Dodgers, and they just about did.

Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.

Reactions: MikeD-C05 and Howard Simmons

TRG

Yesterday at 2:01 PM

Bruce said:
According to industry figures reported by Sports Media Watch, this year's World Series averaged 11.69 million viewers on FOX, down 26% from the 15.71 million average the 2025 series delivered.

People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees. :devilish

Bruce

Yesterday at 2:14 PM

AZ. said:
Yep ratings have lots to do with what teams are playing. Large market over smaller. Underdog teams people want to root for. But If you make it hard to watch all the playoffs, you will get less interest for the World Series.

Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 5:12 PM

TRG said:
People are tired of watching the World Series without the Yankees.

Not Me, I rather enjoy it ...

Reactions: TRG and Foxbat

Jimbo

Yesterday at 5:13 PM

Bruce said:
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.

Quick Question, WITHOUT Looking it up ...
Who played in the World Series last year ?

Jimbo

Yesterday at 5:14 PM

Bruce said:
Except last year, the playoffs were aired on the same channels as this year.

True, but you had 2 Large Markets in it .

Reactions: Foxbat

Bruce

Yesterday at 7:30 PM

Jimbo said:
Quick Question, WITHOUT Looking it up ...
Who played in the World Series last year ?

Two MLB teams.

Jimbo

Yesterday at 7:35 PM

Bruce said:
Two MLB teams.

Now, having low numbers this past year doesn't surprise me at all, you had 2 teams that don't like to spend tons of money and they are not your Large markets.

TRG

Yesterday at 8:53 PM

Jimbo said:
Not Me, I rather enjoy it ...

I thought you might like that. :biggrin

Jimbo

Today at 6:46 PM

Bruce said:
But I never posted about the playoffs, only the World Series.

And a 4 million drop in households is a big deal, specially what Fox pays for it, they are already losing money on the MLB contract, now even more, since they might have to give some of the money back to advertisers, since it might of not made certain ratings goals.

I guess they should figure that out ... maybe not offer as much if they can't afford it next time.

View all replies (918)

dfergie

Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!

Last reply Today at 5:24 PM · posted in The Sports Section

Auto Racing 2026

New thread or keep this one?

View: https://www.youtube.com/live/AgOI9DNCmPg?si=l-YcZmHl7GXXF8fX

162 Replies · 4010 views

Load Replies (162) Reply Legacy View

Reactions: Foxbat and meStevo

dfergie

Oct 9, 2026

Tried to watch the truck race but the stage c**p is why I don't watch NASCAR anymore…

Reactions: Yespage

Yespage

Oct 16, 2026

Today is the anniversary of Dan Wheldon's passing at Las Vegas in a dreadful crash that luckily didn't take more drivers' lives. I vaguely remember the crash, but I more strongly remember Paul Tracy trying to keep it together as he left the Medical Center knowing that Dan most likely wasn't going to.

The safety in these vehicles is beyond incomprehensible, especially relative to what it was 60 years ago, when dying wasn't unexpected. But it is still very dangerous. I always scoff at the prayer invocations, but never scoff at the risks these drivers take and the emergency workers out there who might need to pull short of a miracle to save a driver's life.

dfergie said:
Tried to watch the truck race but the stage c**p is why I don't watch NASCAR anymore…

HBO Max has the live in car streaming without commercials, which provides an interesting take, but you are driving blind, knowing only what the team is telling the driver about what is happening on the track. The stages definitely ruin the NASCAR set up.

Reactions: dfergie

Yespage

Oct 30, 2026

NASCAR is an abject mess, but at least it has Kyle Larson. Guy had the lead on the green/white checker, fell back to 12th or the like, kept his cool, and charged back to win with room to spare at the line. And win very cleanly!

NASCAR needs to stop racing at Talladega. Especially if they are going for elderly Sunday drives at the track! Stage racing is real stupid, but NASCAR should consider one half point a second per group gap as a bonus.

Foxbat

Nov 2, 2026

Congratulations to the youngest Formula 1 World Champion, 20-year old Kimi Antonelli! The podium at the Mexican Grand Prix featured three World Champions with 4-time World Champion Max Verstappen, 7-time World Champion Lewis Hamilton, and newly-crowned World Champion Kimi Antonelli. A dozen World Championships represented!

https://youtube.com/post/UgkxnO1m73VHzLCyqFP8qgvzZMJyvwqtcc4d

Reactions: Yespage, dfergie and meStevo

dfergie

Today at 5:24 PM

View: https://www.youtube.com/live/cbq3r3q5_1c?is=QHIwtnaoagug4G2V

View all replies (162)

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Today at 5:22 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Security Now 1104

Time for another AWESOME video from the TWIT Network!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ti8LXlpJEvI

Direct YouTube Link - Security Now 1104
TWIT's Website
TWIT Live Feed

0 Replies · 9 views

Replies Reply Legacy View

TWiT Tech Podcast Network

Today at 4:12 PM · posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network