1.2M MiniBud

Status
Please reply by conversation.

Anole

SatelliteGuys Master
Sep 22, 2005
11,819
14
L.A., Calif.
When people were going nuts a few years ago, testing miniBUDs, the best results seemed to use...
- C band LNBF at the focal point
- Ku LNBF mounted as close to the side as possible

Dual band C/Ku LNBFs didn't work so well.
 

Kraven

Resident Bozo
Jun 2, 2012
11,917
2,941
Northern, VT
When people were going nuts a few years ago, testing miniBUDs, the best results seemed to use...
- C band LNBF at the focal point
- Ku LNBF mounted as close to the side as possible

Dual band C/Ku LNBFs didn't work so well.

I was thinking about it, but w/ the conical scalar,it would move the Ku LNB 2-3 inches from the centre.
 

FaT Air

HOA Free Zone
Feb 27, 2010
6,668
917
97W 48N
IMHO - With the low gain and side lobe interference being higher on a small dish, It's going to require the C band LNBF at the sweet spot to get all it can. The Ku has enough leeway, in gain and sidelobe performance, as to afford it being offset from the perfect focal point.(and still get acceptable performance)
Mike Kohl has pics of Ku LNBF's mounted even further 'off center' http://www.global-cm.net/multifeedsys.html
 

Corrado

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 2, 2007
2,448
350
Hudson Valley Region, NY
I tried using a Primestar dish and a several others dual C/Ku LNBF and the focal point seems designed for a much larger dish.

The conical scalar is really a necessity for the C band on the undersized dish if you intend on trying to actually watch the signal you tune in. I have 4 setup currently with reliable stable signals. On 99w I have great reception on the ABC feeds which are DVB-S2 with 9/10 FEC on a larger 1.8m dish.
 

pro96

You Member, Member ?
Supporting Founder
Jul 18, 2005
6,464
15
OC
On 99w I have great reception on the ABC feeds which are DVB-S2 with 9/10 FEC on a larger 1.8m dish.

Same here.. on my 6ft dish I get the ABC HD NET-2, 3 and 4 with 78% Signal.

On my 1.2m using a Conical .. zero

Posted Using The New SatelliteGuys Reader App!
 

KE4EST

SatelliteGuys Is My Second Home
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Lifetime Supporter
Aug 9, 2004
27,064
7,380
EM75xb
Yep your best bet it not to use a dual C/Ku LNBF results will be bad. Get a dedicated C-Band LNBF and side mount the Ku. :)
 

pro96

You Member, Member ?
Supporting Founder
Jul 18, 2005
6,464
15
OC
Am hoping NOT to go the 1.2m route..just keeping my options open.

Thanks all, K

Get both 1.2m and Cband for double pleasures .

Posted Using The New SatelliteGuys Reader App!
 

Anole

SatelliteGuys Master
Sep 22, 2005
11,819
14
L.A., Calif.
One nice thing about a 1.2 M miniBUD is that you can move it with a DiSEqC H-H motor and use USALS, unlike a larger dish with an actuator.
True, but you can get pretty good aiming, if you can find an H-H motor for your BUD.
And a hell of a lot better beamwidth. ;)

But for those determined to go down the 1.2 meter road, ACradio once reported using a flat scalar, but pushing it to the (dish) end of your LNBF.
At that point, it performed more like a conical scalar.
This is not a recommendation; just something you can try if you don't have a conical scalar on hand.
I linked to the post by ACradio a number of times, so look up what he said for best results.
 

Kraven

Resident Bozo
Jun 2, 2012
11,917
2,941
Northern, VT
In all honestly, if am able to get some Networks, Ion, Family, Me, Me2, MyTV, This and other networks I'd be happy with it.

Cheers, K
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Pantagon Channel mux 101W down?

TNNE on 87.0°W C-Band

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts