AMC -14 Info

  • WELCOME TO THE NEW SERVER!

    If you are seeing this you are on our new server WELCOME HOME!

    While the new server is online Scott is still working on the backend including the cachine. But the site is usable while the work is being completes!

    Thank you for your patience and again WELCOME HOME!

    CLICK THE X IN THE TOP RIGHT CORNER OF THE BOX TO DISMISS THIS MESSAGE

k1wy-bill

SatelliteGuys Family
Original poster
May 4, 2007
79
0
W.Hartford CT
From NASA Space Warn Bulletin 01APR08:

AMC 14 was to be an American geostationary communications craft. It was launched by a Proton-M rocket from Baikonur on 14 March 2008, but the Breeze-M final stage failed to deliver the craft to geostationary orbit. With an altitude deficit of 8000 km, it would require the use of all the fuel to raise the orbit, severely curtailing its life span. As of 31 March 08, its period remained 576 min, inclination at 49°, perigee at 773 km, and apogee at 35,576 km, indicating that no attempt to make it geostationary might have been made.
 
Since the final Breeze-M delivery destination was to be inclination 19.7°, perigee 6257 km, and apogee 35,786 km, it's not that far off. I expect any day now to see the sat moving toward it's geo-stationary (inclination 0°, perigee and apogee 35,786 km) destination.
 
Sure sounds bad. Maybe that Russian announcement was correct after all. :(
 
I'm sure that decision will be heavily influenced by their insurance companies decision.
 
I agree with Navychop, SES's decision depends on the insurance companies. If they will call it a complete failure, then SES will de-orbit it, if they will pay for a shortened life span then SES will move it to 61.5 w.
 
I'm confused. Even if the insurance company says it's a complete failure, which I think they already have, they can still try to put it in a usable orbit.
 
I'm confused. Even if the insurance company says it's a complete failure, which I think they already have, they can still try to put it in a usable orbit.
If the insurance company calls it a complete failure, they become the owner of the satellite when payment is made. It will have to be purchased back in order to move it to proper orbit.
 
I think the insurance policy written on these things have tons of what ifs, not sure they can get paid in full for the satellite if they can use it and get revenue from it. I am sure they can get some money from the policy if they move it and use it. I would guess SES has to figure how much they expected to earn and what they can get now.
 
There is the possibility that Dish could buy the satellite at a bargain basement price from the insurance company. AMC-14 might be more valueable to Dish from a strategetic point of view than to SES Americom from a financial point of view.

In addition, I believe it took three months after launch that the AsiaSat satellite that suffered a similar fate as AMC-14 for the insurance situation to be cleared up before the satellite was manuevered around the moon and put into a useful orbit. I believe it only took about 45 - 60 days to get the satellite operational after the lunar manuever was initiated.
 
How about one more fly in the ointment...Even though E* does not own the sat, I read on one of their statements (I don't have the link to Dish's statement), Dish paid a lot of upfront costs on this bird as well, which Charlie said was insured. So the bottom line is that Dish has a stake in this too, at least from a insurance/financial standpoint.
 
I know it's just pure speculation on my part, but it seems to me that the current status of AMC-14 is one of several possible and predictable outcomes of the launch, and that provisions would have (or should have) been written into the contracts to handle each possible contingiency.

I would think that the worst time to start negotiating is while the satellite is in a useless orbit.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)