AT&T exploring Deal to sell off DIRECTV.

Rolling Joe

SatelliteGuys Pro
May 12, 2012
447
237
Spokane, WA
  • Haha
Reactions: (((Garyd)))

Juan

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 14, 2003
33,320
10,507
Moscow Russia
Its the spinoff thing with private equity investors...they want to merge it with dish...but not with charlie...you think its bad under att..it can be alot worse
 
  • Like
Reactions: whitewolf8214

slice1900

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 14, 2015
1,750
798
IA
I'll bet the private equity guys are the ones who started this rumor... If they do end up selling Directv, I'm willing to bet AT&T TV comes along with it.
 

Yespage

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Feb 27, 2010
18,023
18,516
Ohio
Why would private equity want to buy a giant of the dinosaur age? It isn't a viable long term investment and how much can be sold for parts?
 

Radioguy41

SatelliteGuys Pro
Pub Member / Supporter
Aug 7, 2008
2,962
3,193
Lehighton, PA
I wonder at what point AT&T decides the best route would be to get totally out of the TV business since they obviously and painfully have no idea what they're doing. Personally I think it's going to take a major shakeup at the top of the corporate ladder because the people responsible for this mess are never going to admit it and to sell off DTV and/or other TV services would be a de-facto admission of failure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whitewolf8214

Jimbo

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 14, 2005
70,437
8,868
NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
I wonder at what point AT&T decides the best route would be to get totally out of the TV business since they obviously and painfully have no idea what they're doing. Personally I think it's going to take a major shakeup at the top of the corporate ladder because the people responsible for this mess are never going to admit it and to sell off DTV and/or other TV services would be a de-facto admission of failure.
I doubt they would abandon the Streaming side of things, they will continue to tweak what they have and dump some while starting another to see if they can hit on something ... at the moment its ATT TV TW ... that will change, yet again.

Please, NO BODY sign up for a Year or longer Contract with ANYBODY ...

If someone sees that a Contract will start to work, they all will want to go that way.

1 year contract, I could see, because if its something I like, I'll pay once a year for it, but they should offer a discount if they want the yearly amount.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whitewolf8214

nelson61

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
8,796
8,865
Where it's Warm
Why would private equity want to buy a giant of the dinosaur age? It isn't a viable long term investment and how much can be sold for parts?
Usually the vultures will slash and whack , sell off good parts and borrow on the rest with junk bonds.

Everything aimed at sucking cash out of the corpse and leaving a dry shell.

The last thing you want to be is a Directv employee. It would/will to be ugly.

Sent from S10 Plus
using the SatelliteGuys app!
 

rad

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Cutting Edge
Sep 7, 2003
11,703
6,203
Dripping Springs, TX
Does AT&T really need the money that bad? I mean DIRECTV is still bringing in money to the death star. And if they lost all the DIRECTV subs what would that do to the contracts and pricing for the channels on AT&T TV? I thought one of the reason AT&T wanted them for their customer base to allow them to get better pricing for their streaming service channels. Would it also impact their wireless customer base for the customers that might switch providers if they lose the benefits that come with the combined company such as streaming DIRECTV/AT&T TV doesn't count against usage and free HBO for certain package?
 

slice1900

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 14, 2015
1,750
798
IA
Why would private equity want to buy a giant of the dinosaur age? It isn't a viable long term investment and how much can be sold for parts?

If they really can get it for $20 billion they'll make money. Directv is still generating over $1 billion in cash flow each quarter despite the subscriber losses, so if they can maintain that it'll pay for itself in less than five years.

Maybe they can't maintain that forever (though they have so far) but they'd easily make a nice return in a decade. That's around the time when the satellites might start needing to be replaced, but the business would probably mostly be whatever "AT&T TV" is renamed to rather than an actual satellite business by then, as broadband/5G would be available to most people in the US.

As for why AT&T would be willing to sell for only $20 billion, I'm skeptical. The one thing in favor of that is that the CEO who did the purchase is retiring, so the new guy can blame the old guy for the big loss. If he was staying on he wouldn't want to take the loss on the sale himself.

AT&T has owned it for what five years now? So they've probably skimmed at least $20 billion in profit off it, and got the benefit of better programming cost for Uverse TV, so if they could get $25 billion it might be close to break even. Not that they were looking for break even when they bought it, but at this point they'd probably take it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yespage

ncted

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Jul 4, 2004
6,148
4,386
Durham, NC
They should be forced to sell it given all the FCC complaints AT&T is getting over giving themselves favorable pricing for their own channels -- something they agreed not do to initially, and then promised not to do during the trial when the feds fought the merger. They are charging Comcast, Charter, etc. more for TimeWarner channels than they charge DirecTV, which is monopolistic behavior. Of course, given the erosion of antitrust enforcement over the past couple of decades, I have no expectation that anything will happen to AT&T on this front.
 

Juan

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 14, 2003
33,320
10,507
Moscow Russia
Why would private equity want to buy a giant of the dinosaur age? It isn't a viable long term investment and how much can be sold for parts?
Its also the sameway they got rid of yellow pages, phonebooks, paging services and unprofitable landlines...its biggest draw us that its a big fat tax writeoff
 

Yespage

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Feb 27, 2010
18,023
18,516
Ohio
They should be forced to sell it given all the FCC complaints AT&T is getting over giving themselves favorable pricing for their own channels -- something they agreed not do to initially, and then promised not to do during the trial when the feds fought the merger. They are charging Comcast, Charter, etc. more for TimeWarner channels than they charge DirecTV, which is monopolistic behavior. Of course, given the erosion of antitrust enforcement over the past couple of decades, I have no expectation that anything will happen to AT&T on this front.

Erosion? I'd say elimination.
 

Cubs1

SatelliteGuys Family
Apr 12, 2019
52
12
Illinois
Why att buy it directv first place if u want so bad buy now att complaint don't have money that's silly u already own directv and att now and internet and att wireless service and cable company no making nonsense at all why they want rid of it directv u just brought directv they shouldn't never brought it first place that's too bad I'm not leaving directv I'm happy with service if they trying rid I guess I had to go back cable again because ofc is not enough Channels on Comcast that's one plm I'm happy with directv had more channels than Comcast


Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
 

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
17,347
22,675
Why would private equity want to buy a giant of the dinosaur age? It isn't a viable long term investment and how much can be sold for parts?

It will be a much bigger Dinosaur if StarLink works out like they say it will, all those rural customers will have access to high speed internet and all the entertainment choices that come with it.
 

When is the last time DirecTV added a new channel?

Double Play Question

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 5)

Top