AT&T Should sell DIRECTV to DISH

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Support Forum' started by Scott Greczkowski, Jun 7, 2019.

  1. Scott Greczkowski

    Scott Greczkowski Topic Starter Scanning the Skies! Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Posts:
    97,609
    Likes Received:
    13,812
    Location:
    Newington, Connecticut
    NashGuy, Ilya and whitewolf8214 like this.
  2. comp9

    comp9 SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2017
    Posts:
    519
    Likes Received:
    154
    Location:
    PA
    Nothing like a paywall
     
    reddice likes this.
  3. Scott Greczkowski

    Scott Greczkowski Topic Starter Scanning the Skies! Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Posts:
    97,609
    Likes Received:
    13,812
    Location:
    Newington, Connecticut
    No paywall for me. Just loads up.

    A way around paywalls is to put your browser in Private Browsing or Incognito mode. :)


    Sent from my iPhone using the SatelliteGuys app!
     
    whitewolf8214 likes this.
  4. NYDutch

    NYDutch SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Posts:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Location:
    Where our wheels go
    No paywall here either. The site just came up in the clear using Chrome.
     
    whitewolf8214 likes this.
  5. ncted

    ncted SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Posts:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    2,790
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    Looks like a metered paywall. Once you hit a predetermined number of views, you hit the paywall.
     
  6. Scott Greczkowski

    Scott Greczkowski Topic Starter Scanning the Skies! Staff Member HERE TO HELP YOU!

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Posts:
    97,609
    Likes Received:
    13,812
    Location:
    Newington, Connecticut
    Yup but use the Incognito mode, and the meter starts from scratch while you are in that mode. :D
     
    mackie99 and whitewolf8214 like this.
  7. CSM

    CSM SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2015
    Posts:
    795
    Likes Received:
    163
    Location:
    Chesterfield, MO
    #7 CSM, Jun 7, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2019
    reddice and whitewolf8214 like this.
  8. NashGuy

    NashGuy SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Posts:
    535
    Likes Received:
    231
    Location:
    Nashville, TN USA
    I think that AT&T's acquisition of DTV will increasingly be viewed as a strategic mistake as the traditional cable TV bundle -- especially delivered over DBS satellite -- continues to rapidly decline. So I think this idea of AT&T spinning off DTV will become a common refrain on Wall Street in the next couple of years. But AT&T's current leadership is loathe to admit that they never should have purchased DTV.

    I do think there's a pretty decent chance that, maybe a couple years from now, AT&T tries to somehow divest from their satellite TV business. In the meantime, I think they'll try to migrate a lot of their TV customer base over to their forthcoming streaming TV service (AT&T TV, or whatever they brand it). That'll be especially true of those satellite customers who live in homes where AT&T Fiber/Internet is available, because they'll hope to achieve a long-term IP-based double play (broadband + TV) among that population.

    The tricky question, though, is who might want to buy DTV satellite or how it might be merged with DISH. Hard to see any third party wanting to invest in the sinking ship of DBS TV. So AT&T would probably need DISH to either buy it outright or maybe form some kind of joint-venture subsidiary that DISH and AT&T co-owned (and that distanced the satellite TV business from AT&T's stock price).
     
  9. lparsons21

    lparsons21 SatelliteGuys Master Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Posts:
    7,901
    Likes Received:
    4,902
    Location:
    Herrin, IL 62948
    I personally am not buying into the demise of sat tv. I will admit I think it will get to the point of only being able to support a single company though. But how to get to one company is the question. A merger/buyout of one over the other seems problematic because the only similarity between the two is they use satellites, otherwise all the consumer end equipment is quite different.

    I also am not buying into the pie in the sky of how much 5G and the launching of a bazillion satellites for internet service is going to happen anytime real soon.

    Just call me a curmudgeon or Luddite if it makes you feel better! :)



    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
     
    Pere845, Jimbo and navychop like this.
  10. slice1900

    slice1900 SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Posts:
    984
    Likes Received:
    410
    Location:
    IA
    I've never seen an acquisition made for $10 billion or more that wasn't a mistake in hindsight. Can anyone think of one?

    I cringe every time I read someone saying that Apple should buy Netflix or Tesla or whatever. As an investor I'm glad that Apple stays far away from stupid ideas like that and only does small targeted acquisitions.
     
    Jillian2 likes this.
  11. Juan

    Juan Supporting Founder Supporting Founder

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Posts:
    22,844
    Likes Received:
    4,730
    Location:
    Moscow Russia
    Do you have a landline?
    Sent from my SM-G950U using the SatelliteGuys app!
     
  12. navychop

    navychop Member of the Month - July 2014! Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Posts:
    47,423
    Likes Received:
    12,400
    Location:
    Northern VA
    I think I prefer curmite to luddgeon.

    Dish does not today use Ka for home delivery. Other than those, maybe Dish would be ahead to just buy sats and slots as DTV dwindles and there are no buyers for L,S&B.

    I am conflicted over Apple or some such buying Tesla. On the one hand, the cash would ensure Tesla remains at the forefront and well ahead of all competitors. Some old line auto manufacturers disappear and Tesla becomes profitable with a large market share. Plenty of future there.

    OTOH, what does Apple et al know about automobiles? But they know technology!


    Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
     
    whitewolf8214 and RobertSM like this.
  13. NashGuy

    NashGuy SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Posts:
    535
    Likes Received:
    231
    Location:
    Nashville, TN USA
    Ha, not calling you a luddite. However, you say you don't buy into the demise of satellite TV but then basically admit that, yes, it's in long-term decline (at least mild decline) which will necessitate that the industry consolidates from two major national players to one.

    To be honest, I think there's quite a bit of uncertainty over how steep/fast the decline of DBS TV will be. And I would agree with you that, at least in the next several years, it's not going away. But I think we could both agree that it's definitely not a growth industry.

    When I get into these debates/discussions with longtime satellite TV fans, it seems like they often defend DBS as a TV distribution technology. And I admit that there's nothing wrong with DBS technology, per se. Sure, it suffers from a little rain fade but it has an ability to reach people nationwide, something that other forms of TV cannot do. (And it can deliver lots of HD channels with great picture quality too!) The problem with DBS is mainly due to the changing nature of the TV business. The business of cobbling together packages of other companies' cable channels and then reselling them at a low margin to subscribers is fading as consumers increasingly turn to direct-to-consumer streaming services. That shift doesn't hurt cable TV operators because they're also broadband operators. (In fact, it may actually HELP cable operators because their broadband profit margins are way higher than their TV profit margins.) But it hurts DISH and DirecTV because, well, they can't deliver broadband through their dishes.

    I do believe that DBS TV will continue to have a captive audience of consumers who have no other choice for pay TV. But that group of consumers will only ever shrink. How quickly, I don't know. But any logical interpretation of the facts and trends in front of us tells us that DBS TV is a business in long-term decline.

    That, I believe, is what makes DirecTV ill-suited to ownership by AT&T, at least from the perspective of Wall Street. The rest of AT&T is at least plausibly positioned for continued future growth. But everyone knows that's NOT the case for DirecTV. Which is why it might make sense for it to trade as a separate stock, perhaps a stock that is a joint DirecTV/DISH operator.
     
  14. CSM

    CSM SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2015
    Posts:
    795
    Likes Received:
    163
    Location:
    Chesterfield, MO
    whitewolf8214 likes this.
  15. lparsons21

    lparsons21 SatelliteGuys Master Lifetime Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Posts:
    7,901
    Likes Received:
    4,902
    Location:
    Herrin, IL 62948
    No but I’m looking into a really nice horse and buggy combo! :)


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
     
  16. goaliebob99

    goaliebob99 SatelliteGuys Master Supporting Founder

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Posts:
    14,417
    Likes Received:
    475
    Location:
    -.-. .... .. -.-. .- --. ---
    Im not buying what barons is trying to sell! At this point DIRECTV’s infrastructure is so integrated into AT&T’s infrastructure that the amount of work needed to re separate that would be enormous and expensive. I don’t see this happening at all!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    bobvick and whitewolf8214 like this.
  17. slice1900

    slice1900 SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Posts:
    984
    Likes Received:
    410
    Location:
    IA
    Consider the original source of this - an analyst from UBS. They're an investment bank, who make money off fees in large mergers and acquisitions. It is the job of their analysts to come up with scenarios like this hoping to drum up business.

    It doesn't make sense in any way to combine Directv and Dish, there are no synergies to extract at this point because satellite TV won't be around long enough for Dish to convert their customers over to Directv's system (they'd want to do that even if they were the buyer, because Directv has more than twice as many satellite customers so it would be really stupid the other way around)

    This stopped making sense about 10 years ago, and every year that goes by it becomes stupider to contemplate.
     
    DS0816, whitewolf8214 and comp9 like this.
  18. NashGuy

    NashGuy SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Posts:
    535
    Likes Received:
    231
    Location:
    Nashville, TN USA
    As many do on these forums, you're focusing on the technology. The case for a merger between DTV and DISH has nothing really to do with how compatible or not their systems are. Has everything to do with removing your only direct competitor (leaving millions of consumers with no other choice for pay TV -- except Orby, LOL) and with scaling up your (otherwise dwindling) subscriber base to better position you when it's time to renegotiate those carriage contracts. Sirius and XM didn't merge because they were perfect technology matches. They merged because they were direct competitors and the market just wasn't big enough for both of them. Rather than trying to see which would bleed out first, they just asked Uncle Sam if they couldn't team up.

    There are a few other efficiencies to be had in a DTV+DISH hookup, I guess: unified billing, unified team of installers and customer support, maybe standardizing on one set of STBs (e.g. everyone gets some variant of the Hopper, although boxes used with DTV dishes may have to have slightly different internals than ones used with DISH dishes). But those are minor considerations. It's mainly about achieving far greater price control and higher profit margins.

    I don't think the government should allow it right now, frankly, because it would be a pretty anti-consumer move. And we're not yet at a point where either business looks close to non-viable. But things might look different in a few years and, honestly, I'm not sure how much confidence I have in the DOJ and FCC to put consumers' best interests above stockholders'.
     
    Pere845, JSheridan and DS0816 like this.
  19. CSM

    CSM SatelliteGuys Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2015
    Posts:
    795
    Likes Received:
    163
    Location:
    Chesterfield, MO
    That latest article I posted thought the government would allow it because of all the streaming services.
     
  20. NYDutch

    NYDutch SatelliteGuys Pro Pub Member / Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Posts:
    1,784
    Likes Received:
    2,209
    Location:
    Where our wheels go
    And competitive streaming music was a large part of why the Sirius/XM merger was allowed.
     
    whitewolf8214 likes this.

Separate names with a comma.

More...