AT&T To Buy DIRECTV for $67 Billion

Status
Please reply by conversation.

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
25,364
4,607
Norman, OK
I am sure there will be more lawsuits too... The lawyers will make some cash and the plaintiffs (i.e. stockholders) will get nothing of value...
 

whitewolf8214

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
May 13, 2004
40,379
799
Space
The NFL Sunday Ticket package is only available to DirecTV subscribers, meaning millions of fans who don’t have the ability to put a satellite dish on their roofs are shut out. But that could change if AT&T succeeds in its attempt to purchase DirecTV. The Wall Street Journal reports that AT&T is floating the possibility of offering Sunday Ticket to all its wireless phone customers. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ireless-customers/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs
 

acostapimps

SatelliteGuys Pro
Jan 31, 2012
972
61
Illinois
So basically Directv likes partnering with AT&T because of it's bundle service and AT&T likes Directv for it's Sunday Ticket.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk
 

Bodo Fenrirsson

On Vacation
Jul 21, 2009
14,068
2,606
Grovetown,GA
The NFL Sunday Ticket package is only available to DirecTV subscribers, meaning millions of fans who don’t have the ability to put a satellite dish on their roofs are shut out. But that could change if AT&T succeeds in its attempt to purchase DirecTV. The Wall Street Journal reports that AT&T is floating the possibility of offering Sunday Ticket to all its wireless phone customers. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ireless-customers/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs
It can also offer NFL ST to its U-Verse TV customers. It can pretty much,over time,align Directv content with U-Verse TV content so that it would be one & the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stargazer

whitewolf8214

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
May 13, 2004
40,379
799
Space
AT&T and DirecTV Plead for Merger, Promising New and Improved Broadband, Video and Wireless Bundles http://blogs.barrons.com/techtrader...d-wireless-bundles/?mod=yahoobarrons&ru=yahoo AT&T defends DirecTV deal to US regulators http://www.cnbc.com/id/101753319 AT&T makes case for $48.5 billion merger with DirecTV....In statement to FCC, firm says without deal neither company can compete against rival cable giants http://www.cnet.com/news/at-t-makes-case-for-48-5-billion-merger-with-directv/ AT&T, DirecTV merger could make it harder to cut the cord http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-merger-could-make-it-harder-to-cut-the-cord/
 

Jimbo

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Cutting Edge
Jul 14, 2005
68,914
7,256
NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
Translation U-Verse is a failure because it does not generate near enough money compared to wireless...
IF you read the story, thats NOT at all what it said.

You'd be nuts to expect a limited footprint of U Verse TV to make as much as a Nationwide Wireless Cell service.
 

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
25,364
4,607
Norman, OK
IF you read the story, thats NOT at all what it said.

You'd be nuts to expect a limited footprint of U Verse TV to make as much as a Nationwide Wireless Cell service.
"AT&T has world-class wireline and wireless broadband facilities, but its video service, which is available in only a minority of customer locations within AT&T’s 22-state incumbent local exchange carrier ('ILEC') region, is uneconomic and not fully competitive with cable providers," the company said.

Note that if AT&T wanted they could have U-Verse in 22 states covering a huge swatch of customers:

Although AT&T lags behind Comcast in Internet and video subscribers, it has double Comcast's overall revenue. AT&T made $128.8 billion in revenue last year compared to Comcast's $64.7 billion. Left unsaid is that AT&T bears responsibility for making U-verse available only in "a minority of customer locations," by choosing to slow down and limit its fiber deployment

They stopped building out U-Verse because they make more money by putting the money into the wireless side of their business.
 

Scott Greczkowski

Welcome HOME!
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Cutting Edge
Sep 7, 2003
102,775
26,458
Newington, CT
Translation U-Verse is a failure because it does not generate near enough money compared to wireless...
It's a failure because of the technology they used. vDSL which is DSL over standard twisted pair copper cables.

This offered no expand ability. In addition in May areas AT&t's copper network is in poor shape.

If they would have followed Verizon Fios lead and went fiber to the home they would be on much better shape now.


Posted Via The FREE SatelliteGuys Reader App!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mike123abc

mike123abc

Too many cables
Supporting Founder
Sep 25, 2003
25,364
4,607
Norman, OK
Gotta love how every article bashes AT&T, but they all would love to be in thier shoes.

AT&T is well known as a stock that makes money for its shareholders. It has done so in the last 15 years by under investing in its land line business and using it as a cash cow to finance the wireless division and pay great dividends. They even tried under investing in the wireless business and had a disaster on their hands when the iPhone overloaded their network. They were forced to put money a lot more money into the wireless business to salvage it. There is a good reason they have trouble competing with U-Verse - they built it as cheaply as possible, contrast that to VZ which does not have much trouble competing with FIOS.

Given AT&T's history, it is not a stretch to think they will simply use DIRECTV as a cash cow too. Again great for the stock holders, but are they really doing the consumer any good? Will AT&T ever really invest more in DIRECTV? Or will they simply manage its decline until every last cent has been extracted from it?
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)