Azbox elite blind scan

grampaw_anderson

Member
Original poster
May 6, 2008
8
0
Dumb question but this box has scrambled what was left of my mind is the scan all frequencies the same as blind scan on the elite ??
I have the very latest software from the other day but basically this thing can not seem to find its way out of a paper bag yes lots of other good things but the lack of a reasonable guide on how to use all the functions this thing makes old-timers pull out what is left of there hair. . Is there a group that writes software in Linux that could write software to make this thing just a damn good FTA sat receiver ? and eliminate alot of the function no one uses:confused::confused::confused::confused:
Thanks Grampaw
 
grampaw_anderson said:
Dumb question but this box has scrambled what was left of my mind is the scan all frequencies the same as blind scan on the elite ??
I have the very latest software from the other day but basically this thing can not seem to find its way out of a paper bag yes lots of other good things but the lack of a reasonable guide on how to use all the functions this thing makes old-timers pull out what is left of there hair. . Is there a group that writes software in Linux that could write software to make this thing just a damn good FTA sat receiver ? and eliminate alot of the function no one uses:confused::confused::confused::confused:
Thanks Grampaw

Hate to tell ya but its not the same as blind scan, if u want blind scan u need the 2 newer models
 
the elite blind scan is about as useful as a comb is to me :);)

you're limited to one symbol rate per blind scan which is useless in my opinion. Thats why I use a Coolsat 5000 and load the TP's that are HD or 4:2:2 into the AZ box
 
Iceberg said:
the elite blind scan is about as useful as a comb is to me :);)

you're limited to one symbol rate per blind scan which is useless in my opinion. Thats why I use a Coolsat 5000 and load the TP's that are HD or 4:2:2 into the AZ box

But not dvb-s2 (hint hint)
 
correct. But I'm mainly KU Band so there's not much on KU that is S2 :)
Seems to me that if you aren't searching for S2 channels on Ku that this could be the reason that you think there isn't much there. :rolleyes:

Actually there are LOTS of S2 transponders on Ku, but since with my Elite I can't really effectively blind scan for them easily, much of it goes by without finding out what's there. But I found a bunch of music channels and a cable type news channel on Ku S2 transponders just in the past 2-3 days, and occasional video stuff shows up there too. I'm really thinking about picking up some S2 blind scan receiver soon, but can't decide which.
I can find high SR S2 channels via a spectrum scan with my Broadlogic 1030 to find the freq and analog baseband to SW to find SR, but this takes about 17 min for the freq scan, and 2 or 3 minutes to determine each SR, so it isn't very convenient.
I've only tried the "blind scan" on the Elite once, on a sat where I knew that there were a couple transponders with a certain SR there to find, and it didn't find them, so I never tried again. However it later occurred to me that perhaps it didn't find them because I already had those transponders entered in the transponder list manually? So I'm curious for those who use the Elite's blind scan, what does it do when you already have a transponder in memory? Perhaps I should try it again.
But yeah, the Azbox doesn't have a "true" blind scan, but a single SR blind scan CAN come in handy when looking for a specific channel that always uses the same SR, particularly on Ku. On C-band, if I'm looking for something that uses say 29270 or 30000, I can find those without blind scan in about 3 minutes by listening on my SW while flipping through the channels, but since Ku channels are kind of non-standard on most analog receivers, you can't do that on Ku. So I really see the Azbox blind scan most useful on Ku.
 
Thanks Guys Just what I expected.I will get out my old pansat or coolsat and use them as I am limited to ku band for now

Grampaw
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts