DISH Cheers Ruling on AutoHop, PrimeTime Anytime

Scott Greczkowski

Welcome HOME!
Original poster
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Cutting Edge
Sep 7, 2003
102,599
25,991
Newington, CT
DISH Cheers Ruling on AutoHop, PrimeTime Anytime

TV viewers' right to skip commercials upheld

Decision viewed as victory for "common sense and customer choice"

ENGLEWOOD, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Judge Dolly Gee of the United States District Court, Central District of California, today rejected Fox Broadcasting Company's efforts to bar DISH subscribers from use of the PrimeTime AnytimeTM and AutoHopTM features found on the pay-TV provider's HopperTM Whole-Home DVR.

The PrimeTime Anytime feature allows users to easily record the primetime shows on up to each of the four broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox) and save them for up to eight days. The AutoHop feature allows users to play back certain PrimeTime Anytime recordings commercial-free, starting the day after broadcast.

A copy of the ruling denying Fox's motion for preliminary injunction has not been publicly circulated because the Court is first giving the parties an opportunity to redact confidential trade information. The ruling relates to case CV 12-04529 DMG.

In the decision, Judge Gee found it likely that:

Contrary to Fox's assertion, DISH customers using PrimeTime Anytime cannot be liable for copyright infringement;
Copies made using the Hopper's PrimeTime Anytime feature do not infringe on Fox's exclusive reproduction rights under federal copyright laws;
Neither the AutoHop commercial-skipping feature nor the PrimeTime Anytime feature constitutes unauthorized distribution under federal copyright laws;
AutoHop does not violate the Video-On-Demand provisions of the 2010 retransmission consent agreement (RTC) between Fox and DISH;
Copies of Fox programs that DISH makes as part of its "quality assurance" of AutoHop's functionality likely violate the RTC between DISH and Fox, and likely violate Fox's exclusive reproduction right under federal copyright laws, but;
Fox has not established that is has suffered irreparable harm as a result of DISH's making the quality assurance copies.
The ruling enables the Company to continue to offer its subscribers the Hopper Whole-Home DVR with both the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. DISH is reviewing today's decision and assessing its impact, especially as it relates to the quality assurance process.

The following statement can be attributed to DISH Executive Vice President and General Counsel, R. Stanton Dodge:

"Today's ruling is a victory for common sense and customer choice.

"DISH is gratified that the Court has sided with consumer choice and control by rejecting Fox's efforts to deny our customers access to PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop -- key features of the Hopper Whole-Home DVR.

"The ruling underscores the U.S. Supreme Court's ‘Betamax' decision, with the court confirming a consumer's right to enjoy television as they want, when they want, including the reasonable right to skip commercials, if they so choose.

"We look forward to vigorously defending AutoHop and Primetime Anytime, and the choice and control those features deliver our subscribers."
 
Well now Directv will release their firmware I'm betting...I hope they release this on the 722's also.
 
I agree, this is common sense. Glad the judge saw through the BS. I do love my Hoppers!
 
Yes I would love to see autohop on the 722's or any of the VIP line.
 
i don't have a hopper but this is great news. now that fox is pissed i wonder what they will try and do now to make dish's life miserable.

Well they just renewed contracts on many fox channels last Oct.Hopefully they are long term.
 
I don't mean to throw cold water on this, but to me this only means Dish can continue to use it while the whole thing goes to court. That said, generally when a ruling not allowing an injunction comes out it does provide some insight that the lawsuit will be an uphill battle.
 
It all goes back to the single user copy exception to the copyrights that were set way back. They were careful to insure that the customer is the "decider". But, they got caught when corperate copied for quality assurance.
 
I don't mean to throw cold water on this, but to me this only means Dish can continue to use it while the whole thing goes to court. That said, generally when a ruling not allowing an injunction comes out it does provide some insight that the lawsuit will be an uphill battle.

I was wondering how many pages I was going to have to read through before someone came along and broke up all the chest bumping and fist pumping. To be fair though, Scott's post was misleading because it didn't include all of the info.

There may be no injunction, but the court did indicate that there are copyright infringement theories to consider.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)