Echostar 5 to move to 148° West

Advertisements
True, but not news, there are two recent threads about it.

The idea is to keep the license for the transponder frequencies that EchoStar 1 cannot service.
 
eventually can be a long time :D
 
Well if it makes it to 148 , I am sure that the reception will be a problem there just like it is at 129 NOW. So I feel sorry for anyone who has to use it for their hd locals.
 
Well if it makes it to 148 , I am sure that the reception will be a problem there just like it is at 129 NOW. So I feel sorry for anyone who has to use it for their hd locals.

As I mentioned, it is only going there to hold the licenses.

I'm sure only test channels will be running...
 
As I mentioned, it is only going there to hold the licenses.

If there is a Ciel-2 launch failure, I doubt Echo5 is going anywhere, so I"m not paying too much attention to the approval at this point because it's all waiting on Ciel-2's outcome.
 
What about Alaska? I saw their locals were up there in digital and hd for Fairbanks and Juneau.

There is no application to move EchoStar 1 at this time.

If Ciel-2 is successful, then EchoStar 1 will not be needed anywhere else, and EchoStar 5 will move there to "cover the even transponder licenses" (which will only used for testing purposes) and provide backup in case EchoStar 1 dies the same way that EchoStar 2 did.
 

Bring back the "No New HD" sticky thread?

Loss of Local Channels-to be fixed by Ciel-2?

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts