He clearly caught the pass, rolled on the ground while still possessing the ball which means he was down with the ball. Then the defensive player stripped the ball away as as they both rolled over.
View attachment 188467
View attachment 188468
He never stablished possession because he lost the ball when he went to the ground. Just like someone toe tapping on the sideline as they fall down and don't complete the process by losing it when they hit the ground. You've gotta stop looking at still frames to pre-judge the outcome, because none of them show possession - because he never established it. The rules are clear.
View: https://x.com/BleacherReport/status/2012698093322453138?s=20
View: https://x.com/GeneSteratore/status/2012896210265219446?s=20
When you slow plays down to 1/100th the speed, it distorts what actually happened and makes it look like, in this case, Cooks possessed the ball for seconds prior to losing it. The game is not played in slow motion or frame by frame.
For a catch:
A) Secure control of the ball
B) Two feet down in bounds
C) After (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, clearly performs any act common to the game (e.g., extend the ball forward, take an additional step, tuck the ball away and turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so.
C is where there is a judgement needed since A and B are clearly met. Now consider this note to the rule:If a player, who satisfied (a) and (b), but has not satisfied (c), contacts the ground and loses control of the ball, it is an incomplete pass if the ball hits the ground before he regains control, or if he regains control out of bounds.
Because Cooks did lose control of the ball when he contacted the ground and the ball never contacted the ground, it was ruled an interception by Denver.
If there was no defender in this play and he lost the ball when he did (which has happened before) it would have been ruled incomplete.
He has to survive the ground and doesn't, it's very clear and not a difficult call.