- Jul 21, 2006
You know you all just burn my butt. Whine and cry about moving. I wonder how many of you self rightness people have the networks. Throw rocks and tell how bad it is. Live in an area that don’t have their locals on the satellite. Then live in the country where hills are all around and ota is impossible. Then pay for a signal test to prove you can’t receive the ota and have the locals tell you oh well. Live with out the networks for a few months then whine and cry how wrong it is to move. I will bet most if not all of you saying how wrong it is can receive the networks by just pushing a button.. If this is true then you need to get off your white horse and clean the sh*** out of the barn.
Take your shevra diction and self-justifying delusions and keep em. Bottom line is this is against the law, it is immoral and unethical. It doesn't matter what you think, it is ILLEGAL. That said, people will do it anyways. And I'm going to laugh my @$$ off when it does inevitably come back. Because the NAB is not known for their customer consideration...*
Yeah then prove it. What law specifically does moving break? Can you site one shred of US code or on piece of State statute that specifically makes moving a crime?
The answer is no you can not. You are either too lazy or too stupid to do research and prove your point. You spout off nonsense based on your belief system and although there is nothing wrong with that you do come off as preachy and lame.
Prove your claims or as Archie Bunker would say "Stifle it!”
I'm disappointed, direct personal attacks? You're not even going to try to approach the issue directly anymore? Running out of hypothetical banter and self-righteous proclaimations of fighting for satellite subscribers freedoms are we?
"Personal insults are the last resort of the ignorant." --MLK
In the Matter of Implementation of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 Development of Competition and Diversity in Video Programming Distribution: Section 628(c)(5) of the Communications Act Sunset of Exclusive Contract Prohibition, CS Docket No. 01-290, 17 FEE Rcd. 12,124 (2002("Program Access Order") at subparagraph 33-34, et al
News Corp. Order at Subparagraph 176, 202, 204.
Competition NOI at 17, 23.
MB Docket No. 05-255
September 19, 2005
Uh oh....Zero can do research. Oh no!
A couple of more questions please before I make the call. My service address would only move fifteen miles making me elgible for St. Louis locals. I want to make sure that my current 110,119,and 129 will read the St. Louis locals and being kind of a wimp here has anyone been questioned by a CSR about the address move?
If you took what I sais as an insult then you have got problems. If you took it as a personal attack then you have very thin skin.
As to your "research" what does that crap mean?
Here is Section 628(c)(5):
5) SUNSET PROVISION.-The prohibition required by para-graph (2XD) shall cease to be effective 10 years after thedate of enactment of this section, unless the Commission finds,in a proceeding conducted during the last year of such 10-year period, that such prohibition continues to be necessaryto preserve and protect competition and diversity in the dis-tribution of video programming
Upon further reading of the act it has nothing to do with the topic. It has to do with freeing up competion between rural sat and cable providers.
Nice try but no where in the crap that you posted does it say if a dbs customer "moves" it is illegal.
Nice try though.
BTW here is a link to the act that you mentioned. It was an interesting read!
Iceberg:St Louis on 118.7 so you need a different dish