recommend a hd receiver

[cmarcum]

I've had a Sony HD-300 for about 6 mos. now and so far it's performed flawlessly. I'd recommend it especially if the price has come down.

 

[all4jo]

well i really think i scored a deal now, i already have a sony universal remote , so that should be ok . and about the scratches, well im putting it inside an entertainment table , so it wont be visible.

Hey Cmarcum , so have you had any type of anoyances with this receiver?
jose

 

[slacker9876]

It is a great receiver (since you didn't pay for the Sony name. Again, since it seems to be so OVERLOOKED. There is no difference between the LG-3200A, Hughes HTL-HD, Sony HD-200 & Sony HD-300 other than an RF remote.

So since you didn't get an RF remote and the HTL-HD's are priced around $190, no I would not say you got a steal. The RF remote will cost you $109 from any source. Good thing you have a universal

But in light of the FACT that the criteria for what makes a good deal, a good deal is when buyer and seller feel they are fairly compensated ... you got a good deal.

 

[cr0mag]

hey how is the sony hd-300 ?
i just clicked on the buy it now for $200
jose

If you get your hands on one of those for $200, then go for it! That's a really great deal on a great piece of gear!

 

[dslchiphead]

Hey what's with Zenith. Did they get out of the HD Sat rcvrs? Those boxes seem to had good press a while ago now. I noticed that some of you have the HD-SAT520.

 

[charper1]

LG is the manufacturer and as of the Zenith HD-SAT530 (aka LG LSS-3200A) LG took over the "name-plate".

 

[dslchiphead]

LG is the manufacturer and as of the Zenith HD-SAT530 (aka LG LSS-3200A) LG took over the "name-plate".

Do you like yours (Pros and Cons)?

I wonder why Zenith makes no mention of it on their web site.

 

[beast37799]

im surprised that the samsung has so many problems >ive has mine since april 04 and i havent had a single complaint maybe i has just lucky