There seems to be an epidemic around here of trying to suppress opinions. I want to encourage everyone here to post any article you may find. There seems to be quite a bit of bullying going on around here. Any article from a national publication posted that gives alternatives to BD is automatically slanted, bias, improperly worded, or some other crap.
Lets not forget that BD is:
1. Facing other HD content, cable, satellite etc
2. 70% of homes don’t own HDTV’s.(biggest hurdle)
3. Much smaller difference between HDM vs DVD then VHS vs DVD.
4. Near HD content(upconvert), cell based upconverters on the way.
5. Very expensive, now with no incentive to lower prices.
6. Incomplete product, even 1.1 players sold today have no guarantee they won’t be obsolete soon.
7. High disk prices
I'm pretty sure the list could go on and on. So with all that said if someone has alternatives its not a crime. This bully tactic of nit picking around the edges of the articles is repugnant.
Lets not forget that BD is:
1. Facing other HD content, cable, satellite etc
2. 70% of homes don’t own HDTV’s.(biggest hurdle)
3. Much smaller difference between HDM vs DVD then VHS vs DVD.
4. Near HD content(upconvert), cell based upconverters on the way.
5. Very expensive, now with no incentive to lower prices.
6. Incomplete product, even 1.1 players sold today have no guarantee they won’t be obsolete soon.
7. High disk prices
I'm pretty sure the list could go on and on. So with all that said if someone has alternatives its not a crime. This bully tactic of nit picking around the edges of the articles is repugnant.