Terrible call to DiSH

Well, Hopper 3, like the label says.
The reason the Hopper 2 was named Hopper w/Sling is that the original Hopper (Hopper 2000) didn't have sling technology.
When the Hopper 3 came out, also with Sling technology, they renamed the previous Hopper 2 and didn't add the "with Sling" to the name of the Hopper 3
But, the front of the receiver says "Hopper 3 with Sling".
 
But, the front of the receiver says "Hopper 3 with Sling".
Because it has Sling Technology.

1763910413199.png
 
Dish never had a Hopper 2. What we often term Hopper 2 is actually Hopper with Sling. There are 4 versions of Hopper; Hopper 2000, Hopper with Sling, Hopper 3, and Hopper Duo.
But you know that Hopper 2 is what we all call it when we are referencing the sequence of hoppers from Hopper 1 to Hopper 3. I don't refer to it as the Hopper with Sling, unless you are looking back on all information about the model when it first came out. :smug
 
But you know that Hopper 2 is what we all call it when we are referencing the sequence of hoppers from Hopper 1 to Hopper 3. I don't refer to it as the Hopper with Sling, unless you are looking back on all information about the model when it first came out. :smug
DISH has always called em
the hopper DUO a dual tuner box wich makes no sense at all
the hopper with sling a three tuner box
then the hopper 3 with sling

iv'e always called mine the hopper 3 :biggrin
 
I never had issues with my two Hopper setup having conflict issues. Both my prior HWSs and presently my Hopper 3s were connected so they can see each other.
Id'e love to know all of these issues. I should have asked the rep about her issues she was having. it might have been a bad install you know new guy not knowing anything about the hopper system :rolleyes... she had one for her and one for her mother she told me she got rid of the second hopper and went with a joey instead and everything works fine!!! she also said that having more than one hopper just creates more zones. one hopper for one part of the house and another part of the house for the second and third hopper
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Well, Hopper 3, like the label says.
The reason the Hopper 2 was named Hopper w/Sling is that the original Hopper (Hopper 2000) didn't have sling technology.
When the Hopper 3 came out, also with Sling technology, they renamed the previous Hopper 2 and didn't add the "with Sling" to the name of the Hopper 3
So where does the Hopper Duo slot into this timewise, and does it do same as ViP Duo, to be able to have 2nd independent user with UHF control?
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
I still say the Wally is the way to go. They're only $60/ea, the second one is $5/mo and after the one time DVR fee, no other monthly fees. Uses the same LNB as the 722 and connects up like all the old school Dish receivers telstar is familiar with. It's as close to the Dish experience in 1997 as you can get.
 
VIP is a DUAL Tuner, not a Duo system
My understanding is that systems designated by DiSH as Duo are usable by 2 users independently from each other. There's the Duo ViP222, the DuoDVR ViP722, etc. They actually started in with Duos way back with the 322/522. Through this time they also referenced single-user only units as Solo, such as SoloDVR ViP612. The 612 is HD-DVR and has 2 tuners but does not do 2 users, thus it is designated SoloDVR ViP612. The 722 also has dual tuners and is a Duo because 2 users.


This implies that the Hopper Duo can serve 2 users. I would presume in same manner as with ViP Duos. If not then they've changed or corrupted the meaning of Duo. It doesn't mean dual tuner, it means dual user.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
My understanding is that systems designated as "Duo" by DiSH are usable by 2 users independently from each other. There's the Duo ViP222, the DuoDVR ViP722, etc. They actually started in with Duos way back with the 322/522. Through this time they also referenced single-user only units as Solo, such as SoloDVR ViP612. The 612 is HD-DVR and has 2 tuners but does not do 2 users, thus it is a Solo. The 722 also has dual tuners and is a Duo because 2 users.


This implies that the Hopper Duo can serve 2 users. I would presume in same manner as with ViP Duos. If not then they've changed or corrupted the meaning of Duo. It doesn't mean dual tuner, it means dual user.
The Hopper Duo can serve 2 users but that second viewer needs a Joey. That Joey, incidentally, provides an HD picture which the 722 didn't. Duo means 2 users over 2 tuners, nothing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
So the Joey itself has no tuners but enables use of one of the Hopper Duo's 2 tuners by a 2nd user in HD? I would thusly allege that calling that Hopper, by itself, a Duo could be misleading. A combo of Hopper Duo plus Joey could be unitarily considered a Duo system. To me, as I've previously opined, that's a step backward from being able to support 2 users out of a single box- I was actually expecting them to progress to like 4 users (Quattro?) or essentially whole home/1unit. But I suppose having both Duo users in HD is still something of a plus.
 

Joey 4.0 Upgrade Request