The OFFICIAL DISH / HBO Thread

E

edisonprime

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Pro
Original poster
Dec 12, 2012
2,868
1,116
55901
One of the reasons I left DirecTV was for Epix, which appears like it will never come to DirecTV, but now Dish doesn't have HBO or Cinemax. I'd like to have all the premium networks out there, but it seems as if I traded the really good HBO and Cinemax for the okay Epix. Do you guys think they will eventually come back, or should I switch back to DirecTV?
 
lucky86

lucky86

SatelliteGuys Pro
Pub Member / Supporter
Sep 19, 2012
3,941
179
By the sea, in a land called Honalee
You couldn't pay me enough to do business with ATT and Direct TV again. Hell to the NO, but that's just my humble opinion. I'm sure it'll be back, but if it doesn't end up coming back, you can still get HBO via other avenues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: papachops, truckracer, WXIK K-96 and 8 others
PHXHoward

PHXHoward

SatelliteGuys Pro
Feb 28, 2009
730
221
PHX
On the bill it says that they are still negotiating a long-term agreement and once it is in place, the channels will be back. So, they are still suggesting that the dispute will be resolved and the channels will return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pere845, NYDutch and charlesrshell
Claude Greiner

Claude Greiner

SatelliteGuys Master
Supporting Founder
Sep 8, 2003
13,225
3,776
Detroit - The Paris of the Midwest
I know your all saying I’m trying to stick it to Dish.

But if you want your HBO back, best thing you can do is call Dish, threaten to cancel and milk them for as many discounts as you can for them to try to keep you as a customer.

Dish keeps a tally of all the credits and cancellations, and the worse it is for them the more likely they will settle.

I remember when the Viacom channels went dark, they where back in a few days after Dish got hammered With complaints left and right.

Remember lifetime, AMC, Fox Sports (in October after baseball) and I believe outdoor life Network.

As I remember nobody really complained and these networks remained off in some cases 3 months.

Eventually it will come back but if you can get a discount off your bill because of this, you should call
 
  • Like
Reactions: neljtorres, pattykay, josem3 and 2 others
NYDutch

NYDutch

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Dec 28, 2013
6,013
9,992
Where our wheels go
Instead of hammering Dish into accepting the programmer's sometimes outlandish demands, how about hammering our Congress critters to fix the laws governing retransmission: Take Action and Write Congress
 
  • Like
Reactions: whatchel1, josem3, Mr. Sheep and 10 others
ncted

ncted

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Jul 4, 2004
5,448
3,722
Durham, NC
I know your all saying I’m trying to stick it to Dish.

But if you want your HBO back, best thing you can do is call Dish, threaten to cancel and milk them for as many discounts as you can for them to try to keep you as a customer.

Dish keeps a tally of all the credits and cancellations, and the worse it is for them the more likely they will settle.

I remember when the Viacom channels went dark, they where back in a few days after Dish got hammered With complaints left and right.

Remember lifetime, AMC, Fox Sports (in October after baseball) and I believe outdoor life Network.

As I remember nobody really complained and these networks remained off in some cases 3 months.

Eventually it will come back but if you can get a discount off your bill because of this, you should call

Additionally (or alternately), you can complain to AT&T/HBO about the dispute: general@hbo.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pere845, D. Manley, long_time_DNC and 2 others
Least

Least

aka. Dr. Fat Man
Lifetime Supporter
Oct 2, 2010
9,691
7,686
Land where we pronounce our "R" as "ah"
In 9 out of 10 disputes, I would see where Claude is coming from. If TBS was pulled, I'd get it. But why for the need of a set subscriber amount for a channel where the subscriber basically pays the channel direct? That should be it! If 100 people sub to HBO, then AT&T gets paid for those 100 people. If 1 million people sub, then AT&T gets paid for the million. It's not up to Dish or any provider to cover a set cost, nor is it up to them to get AT&T subs for HBO. You want subs for your premium? Do the work to get them!

Again if this was a basic channel, I would be singing a different tune. It's a premium channel, or two premium networks to be exact. In essence, Dish isn't rewarded for HBO subs. Dish is rewarded for basic channel subs, but not premium be it HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz, or EPIX. Those revenue goes straight to the channel owners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pattykay, D. Manley, dennispap and 1 other person
ncted

ncted

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Jul 4, 2004
5,448
3,722
Durham, NC
In 9 out of 10 disputes, I would see where Claude is coming from. If TBS was pulled, I'd get it. But why for the need of a set subscriber amount for a channel where the subscriber basically pays the channel direct? That should be it! If 100 people sub to HBO, then AT&T gets paid for those 100 people. If 1 million people sub, then AT&T gets paid for the million. It's not up to Dish or any provider to cover a set cost, nor is it up to them to get AT&T subs for HBO. You want subs for your premium? Do the work to get them!

Again if this was a basic channel, I would be singing a different tune. It's a premium channel, or two premium networks to be exact. In essence, Dish isn't rewarded for HBO subs. Dish is rewarded for basic channel subs, but not premium be it HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, Starz, or EPIX. Those revenue goes straight to the channel owners.

I think Dish does get a cut. If I were Charlie, I would want at least enough to cover the operational costs of carrying those channels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tetrode, dennispap, TheKrell and 1 other person
Claude Greiner

Claude Greiner

SatelliteGuys Master
Supporting Founder
Sep 8, 2003
13,225
3,776
Detroit - The Paris of the Midwest
We don’t even know what the terms of the deal are.

We just all assume that HBO is making un-reasonable demands because we only heard Charlie’s side of things.

For all we know they offered the same deal to Comcast and Spectrum.

I have a feeling the minimum subscriber count is there to encourage Dish to proactively sell the premium channels.

Many times during the free 3 month trial sales people will remind customers to be sure to cancel the movie channels after 3 months so they are not charged.

The sales people want the movies cancelled because the lower the customers bill, the likely they will be able to afford to keep the package.

I have had representatives from HBO come to my office. The way they see it, they see HBO as bringing value to an already great service.

Sales people, dealers, Dish, see HBO as a necessary evil. We would all rather see customers pay their bill rather than load up on movie channels they can’t afford.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jillian2 and pattykay
cpdretired

cpdretired

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Dec 6, 2003
726
328
Lemont, Il.
HBO has been $15.00 per month. So if there is a new contract with $20.00 per month fee is it worth it. Currently HBO is the highest price family channel offered by Dish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pattykay and MikeD-C05
Jim5506

Jim5506

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Oct 19, 2004
7,884
2,936
Lubbock, Texas
Maybe I'll call Dish and complain that if they do take HBO back, I'll cancel and switch to OTA ONLY!
 
  • Like
Reactions: D. Manley, Slamminc11, Gobucks and 2 others
Least

Least

aka. Dr. Fat Man
Lifetime Supporter
Oct 2, 2010
9,691
7,686
Land where we pronounce our "R" as "ah"
I think Dish does get a cut. If I were Charlie, I would want at least enough to cover the operational costs of carrying those channels.
It depends on if they up the price. I know Comcast used to do that. On Comcast, circa 10 years ago, each premium cost $20 a month. That was $20 for all HBO channels and $20 for both channels in The Movie Channel suite. So yes, in that particular case, Comcast did benefit off HBO. But, when HBO Now is $15 a month, and Dish was charging $15 a month, it appears that Dish was solely charging HBO's market value without any extra going to Dish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pattykay, D. Manley and charlesrshell
Least

Least

aka. Dr. Fat Man
Lifetime Supporter
Oct 2, 2010
9,691
7,686
Land where we pronounce our "R" as "ah"
We don’t even know what the terms of the deal are.

We just all assume that HBO is making un-reasonable demands because we only heard Charlie’s side of things.

For all we know they offered the same deal to Comcast and Spectrum.

I have a feeling the minimum subscriber count is there to encourage Dish to proactively sell the premium channels.

Many times during the free 3 month trial sales people will remind customers to be sure to cancel the movie channels after 3 months so they are not charged.

The sales people want the movies cancelled because the lower the customers bill, the likely they will be able to afford to keep the package.

I have had representatives from HBO come to my office. The way they see it, they see HBO as bringing value to an already great service.

Sales people, dealers, Dish, see HBO as a necessary evil. We would all rather see customers pay their bill rather than load up on movie channels they can’t afford.
Both parties have yet to deny that a guaranteed subscriber limit wasn't part of the negotiations. Scott pointed it out as well. That's from where my deductions come. In my opinion, in the internet age, there shouldn't be a subscriber limit, or pull HBO off all providers and go at it on your own with HBO Now.

Perhaps that's a good idea, either create a MAX Now as a companion to HBO Now, collapse Cinemax into HBO Now, as HBO Cinemax, HBO Moremax, HBO Thrillermax, etc, or put Cinemax on providers as a cheaper alternative that advertises HBO Now to get subs to add HBO Now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pattykay, long_time_DNC, Tampa8 and 1 other person
ncted

ncted

SatelliteGuys Master
Pub Member / Supporter
Jul 4, 2004
5,448
3,722
Durham, NC
It depends on if they up the price. I know Comcast used to do that. On Comcast, circa 10 years ago, each premium cost $20 a month. That was $20 for all HBO channels and $20 for both channels in The Movie Channel suite. So yes, in that particular case, Comcast did benefit off HBO. But, when HBO Now is $15 a month, and Dish was charging $15 a month, it appears that Dish was solely charging HBO's market value without any extra going to Dish.

Well, if that is the case, I wouldn't take that deal if I were Charlie, even if it costs me $0.02/sub to deliver the channels, I'd want to get at least that much from the deal to cover my costs, preferably more as subscriber numbers will fluctuate over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSheridan and charlesrshell

Similar threads

E
Replies
10
Views
1K
jerryez
jerryez
worstman1
Replies
10
Views
747
BarnRat
B
Kali05
Replies
1
Views
485
MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05
G
Replies
5
Views
1K
MikeD-C05
MikeD-C05

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

  • edisonprime

Latest posts

Top