It is particularly disturbing to pay a receiver fee for a receiver I bought outright.
That I can understand, and it would be incentive for people to buy them, but I do get where Dish is coming from too. There has been speculation that there is a fee for active outlets Dish must pay to channel owners, so if that is the case, owned or not, the fee makes sense. The way I think about is like Sprint. Whether you own the phone or not, if it is a smart phone, and has been activated or changed after a certain date, they charge a $10 fee for the 4G capability... Even if you do not live in a 4G area, or can use 4G. Just because it is capable. Dish does the same as far as just active receivers. The advantage is you can deactivate purchased equipment whenever you want, and not pay a fee. Leased equipment you must return.
By the way Claude, I know it may not seem like it, but I actually like DTV a lot. If I ever left Dish, I would go to DTV. They have a nice product, I just prefer Dish as I fully understand the product and am ok with being in compliance with their TOS. I wasn't trying to start the debate all over again on which company is better or worse, which is cheaper or more expensive, just curious as to how the numbers truly add up against eachother in the long run. Where do you actually compare, kind of thing.