two degree spacing & KU

Status
Please reply by conversation.

turbosat

SatelliteGuys Master
Original poster
Dec 26, 2006
9,003
80
Oneonta,AL
With all these problems reported with G18 and AMC21 possibly interfering with each other, I wonder : What is the minimum size ku dish that would avoid this, with the now 2degree spacing between sats? I remember reading somewhere long ago, this was by somebody who knew the math, and frequencies involved in C-band, that the minimum size for a C-band to avoid such troubles was 8.5 feet. Most of us with 10' dishes properly aligned never had problems with interference back in the old days, and I haven't noticed any since the skies are full now either. Anybody know the answer?
 
-3 dB Loss @ 11.7 GHz

70 cm (27 in) sees 2.54° to each side.
80 cm (31 in) sees 2.22° to each side.
90 cm (36 in) sees 1.97° to each side.
100 cm (39 in) sees 1.78° to each side.
110 cm (43 in) sees 1.61° to each side.
120 cm (47 in) sees 1.48° to each side.
150 cm (59 in) sees 1.18° to each side.
200 cm (78 in) sees 0.89° to each side.

Here is a good "Antenna beamwidth calculator".

The following images are from: The Battle of the Bands
 

Attachments

  • ku_bmwd.gif
    ku_bmwd.gif
    68.5 KB · Views: 176
  • c_bmwd.gif
    c_bmwd.gif
    70 KB · Views: 162
Last edited:
qwert, I'm sorry but most of that is over my head, as I don't know how much 'db loss' is equal to one sat messing with another. Which amount is acceptable? Is your " -mark supposed to mean degrees? I never got into it deep enough to study beamwidths and stuff, and I flunked out of the NRI Satellite course because I was like Romy and Michelle in math.
 
That should show up as a degree symbol.

-3 dB from the main lobe is what is usually considered for interference.

If all dishes are pointing at 122.85° (G18's exact location) West they will pick up interference from:

70 cm dish [120.31° - 125.39° West]
80 cm dish [120.63° - 125.07° West]
90 cm dish [120.88° - 124.82° West]
100 cm dish [121.07° - 124.63° West]
110 cm dish [121.24° - 124.46° West]
120 cm dish [121.37° - 124.33° West]
150 cm dish [121.67° - 124.03° West]
200 cm dish [121.96° - 123.74° West]

121.0°W is really at 120.77°W and 125.0°W is really at 124.85°W.

So it looks like a 90 cm dish (by 0.03° to the 125.0° West side) is the bare minimum dish size for interference free reception with a 2° Ku band spacing if you have no errors.

Using my pansat 3500 and disecq 1.2 one click is 0.3°
If you look at the dish you can't see a difference, if I take that into account (Alignment error of +/- 0.3°) you really need to have a 110 cm dish.
 
Last edited:
Thanks!!!!! And your degree sign is right, Firefox is displaying it properly. My eyes weren't quite tiny enough tonite to see it lol.
 
Changes to the previous post are done :)

Now I can see why people are complaining about issues with G18 after AMC21 was launched.
(I have not seen any problems with my 1.2 Meter dish :) and the math above shows that I am ok until they decide on using a 1.5 degree spacing :eek:)
 
I must be in the sweet spot because I have no issues with either sat on the 30" dish

the fixed dish at G10 is a 40x30 primestar
 
1m is ok here

Not having any problems with my 1m primestar , so far with 125. Maybe things will tighten up some when they are done testing, aligning, etc. I got a call about a 10' dish I helped put up back in 95 or 96, I think it's a Sami. The owner doesn't need it any more, said I could come get it. Thinking I might just put it up besides my others and make it a totally dedicated 10' KU signal grabber. Hope the motor still works.
 
According to the specs on my 84cm dish it's 2 degrees at 3db down. So 123 being 1.8 degrees away from 125 makes sense with me bumping the dish a tad. One thing that wasn't brought up here is the efficiency of the dish. A dish with better surface accuracy has better efficiency and can be smaller, sloppy reflectors don't play well at 2 degrees.
 

Attachments

  • adthspec.jpg
    adthspec.jpg
    98.4 KB · Views: 148
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)