Uh oh, let the arguing begin! According to Fox Sports: Top 10 WORST Sports franchises

As mwentioned above the Bruins don't belong---even if you look at the criteria listed. The worst thing that can be said is that they have not wona title in 33 years. This is true but when you consider that iti sa 30 team league that is not so bad.---and that woudl apply to other temns as well.

There are bad hockey franchises but they are not listed. And while the Pirates and Reds have problems now they have had their glory days. If current performance is the yardstick you may have to rethink putting the Rays on the list.

And while there are plenty of basketball teams on the list as others have said why not the T'wolves? Then there are the Twins who ahve actually done rather well---especiilaly for a small market team.
 
How about ranking them worst per sport:

Baseball - Pirates (Reds could argue)

Football - Lions (Up until a year or two ago the Saints could have had a strong claim)

Hockey - ? (Gotta be somebody worse than the Bruins)

Basketball - Atlanta Hawks

Basketball has to be the Clippers. All those #1 picks, and they can't win anything except another lottery pick, year after year. How does Elgin Baylor keep his job?
 
Basketball has to be the Clippers. All those #1 picks, and they can't win anything except another lottery pick, year after year. How does Elgin Baylor keep his job?


I honestly think that Clippers ownership long ago decided that they can make money in that market by putting out a mediocre to poor product and taking what amounts to the Lakers overflow for attendance. It would be really hard to be a Clippers fan.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts