I also get a paywall with my Windows 10 laptop that has Firefox and AdblockPlus. Anyway, I get the point: for you, wind turbines stink.
A couple of Firefox extensions that might help...
One button to close any overlay on any website. Contribute to NicolaeNMV/BehindTheOverlay development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
GitLab.com
gitlab.com
As for the wind farm, I'd be interested to know how much of an issue this actually turns out to be. There is an awful lot of negative information out there about wind energy that is of suspicious origin (but still repeated as if it were proven science on certain "news" channels). I would bet far more birds are killed by smacking into vehicle windshields than by flying into a turbine blade. In fact ordinary glass kills many birds every year - we used to have a house with an add-on enclosed patio (what would now be called a three seasons room) that has glass windows all around on three sides, and ever summer several birds would break their necks flying head on into a window (and we didn't even use that glass cleaner that supposedly made glass disappear!). And then there is the biggest killer of smaller birds - domestic house cats! But take a guess why no one is calling to ban cat ownership or clear glass, but making a big deal out of the relatively small number of birds that might get whacked by wind turbine blades, which are relatively easy for birds to see and avoid - the obvious answer is that cats and clear glass do not produce energy that competes with the petroleum industry! And the only reason they aren't saying much about solar energy is because there is really not much they can say other than that the initial cost is significant and that it doesn't produce energy when there's little or no sunlight, but if the astroturf "environmental" organizations that are (secretly or openly) funded by the petroleum industry could attack solar for some "environmental" reason, you can bet they would in the same way that they attack wind energy.
Then there is the fact that a lot of birds fly into jet airplane engines and get killed; IIRC it was a flock of geese that brought down that plane on the Hudson River. But jet aircraft use jet fuel like it was going out of style so those astroturf environmental organizations have not a word to say about that. So this is another case of follow the money.
But I digress... anyway, when it comes to TV reception I have found that unless something is relatively close or high in the sky, it really won't affect reception as much as you might think. Back in the analog days we used to routinely pick up VHF TV stations from 60-70 miles away (and even 90 miles on good days) despite the fact that there were large sand dunes between our location and the stations. UHF may be another story, it was much rarer to pick up UHF stations from that distance. But my gut feeling is that those turbine towers are like fence pickets but spaced a lot further apart, relatively speaking. There should be plenty of room for the TV signals to go around and between the turbine supporting towers and also through the turbine blades. I am not going to say they will have absolutely zero effect but my bet would be that any effects will be negligible. But I may be wrong and will be interested to hear whether there is any actual effect.
Think about it this way, if you were standing on the eastern side of a wind farm that was four or five miles away watching the sun set in the west, would you even notice when the sun got lower in the sky than the wind farm's blades and towers? Maybe you would lose a small amount of light but unless those towers were packed together like trees in a forest it probably wouldn't be that much. And I suspect you will find the same thing is true of your TV signals. If this wind farm were a lot closer (within two or three miles) I suspect the chances of significant impact would be a lot greater.
www.rabbitears.info
