DISH Drops AMC Networks (AMC Back on DISH channel 131)

So, you don't think the consumer has a right to know what is going on?



I apologize if I am speculating but... I thought the whole purpose of the SatelliteGuys forums was to open up specific topics for debate and discussion.



With obvious intent -- but they are your shoes.


.


If your looking for confrontation you won't find it here, there are others who are more than willing to debate this nonsense.
 
demsd said:
Huh? The whole point I was making. :)

No it's not. Every household in America responds to the U.S. Census. Statistics are drawn up and averages are made including the average occupants of a household. They even create household averages for specific age groups. Your point was that in any given area a group of yahoos can get together and watch something. I'm talking about using official data and statistics to derive a number of average possible household viewers. What do you think they say "one house, one viewer?" No! But you are right, they don't take the large groups into effect. Both the networks and the advertisers use this data.
 
When a channel is going to be dropped, yes I think it's incumbent on the principles to tell the consumer why.

Some of the best ideas come from speculating.


Something we agree on. ;)

If your looking for confrontation you won't find it here, there are others who are more than willing to debate this nonsense.

You were the one who "stepped into a pile of bs on a subject" you could "care less about." :confused:
 
Last edited:
No it's not. Every household in America responds to the U.S. Census. Statistics are drawn up and averages are made including the average occupants of a household. They even create household averages for specific age groups. Your point was that in any given area a group of yahoos can get together and watch something. I'm talking about using official data and statistics to derive a number of average possible household viewers. What do you think they say "one house, one viewer?" No! But you are right, they don't take the large groups into effect. Both the networks and the advertisers use this data.

Advertisers use census data to determine how many people might watch a particular show? If DISH has 14 million subs, that could translate into 42 million potential viewers [using an average of 3 people to a household], or 84 million eyeballs. Advertisers don't care what a shows potential viewership could be.

Friends and Murder She Wrote had a similar number of total viewers. But because Friends appealed to a younger audience, NBC was able to charge as much 2-3 times more for a commercial that ran during Friends, then CBS was charging for a commercial that ran during Murder She Wrote.

How does census data predict who in a household is available to watch a particular show at particular time?


 
Here is the problem I have with this.... Why be a subscriber of the provider that constantly decides to "stand up to these companies and say no" as you put it? Why be part of the service that takes channels from you "for the greater good" more than any other provider?

The thing is, I do believe Dish's disputes probably do help keep television service prices down somewhat, but not just for Dish customers. For instance, Dish says no to an increase and pulls a channel. They piss off customers who watch the channel and do all the work to fight with the channel. Say they then get it back, which isn't always the case. Now they have gotten it down to a price they wanted. Now there is a value set for the channel going forward. The other providers might not know the exact settled upon amount but they pay people to make their best possible guess. They also know it probably wasn't a huge increase if Dish got it back. Now when it's Directv's turn they can just come in and say we want the price Dish got. They aren't going to pay more than Dish when they know that is a number the channel in dispute has already agreed to. In the end Directv gets the same negotiation for a similar price without the dispute and pissed off customers.

Sure it's nice that one of the providers is willing to pull channels to prove their point. I'm just not sure why people would be so happy to be a part of all the fights when the other providers all offer similar products for similar prices.


IN the over 15 years of DISH service I have not had any real channels removed that I cared about and that didn't return eventually. I liked the Hd versions of the ABC family and DISNEY removed and I was Okay with that, because I think that Disney was Crazy to try to get Paid twice for both sd and Hd feeds of the same channels. Since they removed the hd version I rarely watch anything on any of these channels now. Lost the Voom channels , and I really liked Monsters Hd, but towards the end when they actually took them off the air, I had lost interest ,because Voom showed the same 4 shows over and over again on their channels all day long. I agreed with DISH's decision to yank the 20 channels and condense them down to 5. When Voom /Cablevison squaked and wanted all 20 on the air or nothing , I agreed with DISH's decision to remove them all. Sports channels I could care less about , and wouldn't mind all of them removed and spun off in their own Premium pack. The whole auto hop lawsuit is about standing up to network tv and their affiliates who want to extort more amd more money for carrying channels that are free over the air. Charlie is standing up for the entire pay tv business by saying NO to these greedy bastards. I agree with him and his position on THESE issues. As I said before I do NOT agree on the FEE structure or the new State Surcharge bull crap. As for DIRECTV , you might get the channels ,but you will pay more to watch them. They are already $10.00 more per programming pack then DISH.
 
MikeD-C05 said:
IN the over 15 years of DISH service I have not had any real channels removed that I cared about and that didn't return eventually. I liked the Hd versions of the ABC family and DISNEY removed and I was Okay with that, because I think that Disney was Crazy to try to get Paid twice for both sd and Hd feeds of the same channels. Since they removed the hd version I rarely watch anything on any of these channels now. Lost the Voom channels , and I really liked Monsters Hd, but towards the end when they actually took them off the air, I had lost interest ,because Voom showed the same 4 shows over and over again on their channels all day long. I agreed with DISH's decision to yank the 20 channels and condense them down to 5. When Voom /Cablevison squaked and wanted all 20 on the air or nothing , I agreed with DISH's decision to remove them all. Sports channels I could care less about , and wouldn't mind all of them removed and spun off in their own Premium pack. The whole auto hop lawsuit is about standing up to network tv and their affiliates who want to extort more amd more money for carrying channels that are free over the air. Charlie is standing up for the entire pay tv business by saying NO to these greedy bastards. I agree with him and his position on THESE issues. As I said before I do NOT agree on the FEE structure or the new State Surcharge bull crap. As for DIRECTV , you might get the channels ,but you will pay more to watch them. They are already $10.00 more per programming pack then DISH.

I 100% agree with U!
 
I also heard the xfinity commercial a few times on the radio. So far...its the only paytv provider I know of,taking advantage of the situation. Screw them idiots...lol. The commercial starts with depressing music...and talks bout how dish is dropping amc...then cheerful music..and the "Ohh come to Xfinity where youll never lose channels"...lol. There prices r very very high to...they fail to mention that...and there hd quality sucks!!
 
Amazon VOD $2.84/episode in HD... No commercials no popups... If they do their 6-10 episodes 18-30$
Season 3 will be 16 episodes. I'm planning on buying the first half of Breaking Bad Season 5 (8 episodes) in sd ($1.89 each) if I have to from Amazon. I've already read The Walking Dead graphic novels, so I can wait for Season 3 to show up on Netflix sometime next year.
 
demsd said:
Advertisers use census data to determine how many people might watch a particular show? If DISH has 14 million subs, that could translate into 42 million potential viewers [using an average of 3 people to a household], or 84 million eyeballs. Advertisers don't care what a shows potential viewership could be.

They don't? That's why I see ads for Depends during friends and ads for ax body spray during murder she wrote. Advertisers do care about potential viewership. They want the most amount of people to see their ads, or pay less for lower viewing times. Potential viewership has everything to do with it. I'm not going to buy ad time for my denture cream during a show like the big bang theory or UFC on FOX.
 
They don't? That's why I see ads for Depends during friends and ads for ax body spray during murder she wrote. Advertisers do care about potential viewership. They want the most amount of people to see their ads, or pay less for lower viewing times. Potential viewership has everything to do with it. I'm not going to buy ad time for my denture cream during a show like the big bang theory or UFC on FOX.
Advertisers will either buy a specific show that has a target audience they want (Depends during Murder She Wrote/Ax during Friends) or buy 'Run of Schedule' (cheaper) and the network decides where the commercial will go. Potential viewership has very little if anything to do with it. Think about it... if everything was strictly subscriber based, the commercial cost would be the same at 2am as it is at 8pm. The 'potential' viewers are the same both times.
 
I'm referring to advertisers buying time known that an entire subscriber base is missing. They will ask for a discount if their ad is going to not reach a large group of viewers.
No, actually what you were talking about (whether you meant it or not) was advertisers picking their shows/networks based on target audiences (demos). That's why you might see a Depends commercial during 'Murder She Wrote' (your example). And, it doesn't matter how many subscribers a network has, if no one's watching, no one will see the ad.

That being said, assuming AMC goes off and stays off Dish, will advertisers who purchased Mad Men want a discount when the new season comes around? Sure.
Will the discount they get (if they get one) have a major impact on AMC? I don't think so.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)