They should do like D's Cutting Edge Program for testing software, then report and post any issues.
Does it work? Any problems using it?
It all sounds too confussing to me. What if someone on a Joey in another room starts changing channels on the same Hopper? Would that screw things up for the one using Multi-Swap on the same Hopper? We hardly watch live TV so I don't think we will use it that much.If you pause it stays paused up to 2 tuners. With more than 2 tuners or buffers it goes to Live TV when switching back and forth and won't stay paused where you left off.
They should do like D's Cutting Edge Program for testing software, then report and post any issues.
Does it work? Any problems using it?
Think about the logistics of that.... "We'd like you to test 'new feature X' and while you're doing that, check everything else to see if it broke anything else." Now, if while testing 'new feature X' you discover something else that's definitely impacted (turn off "X" and see if it still occurs), a tester had better report it.What amazed me is that testing takes place for the new SW functionality only. However, no testing takes place to see if the new SW removes or changes existing features. That is what a DIRT agent told me.
In most companies SW testing( regressive testing) to make sure your new SW doesn't break the old SW features is mandatory before a new SW release is allowed. I taught SW Engineering for 25 years at Texas Tech Univ. and always emphasized regressive testing. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_testing .Think about the logistics of that.... "We'd like you to test 'new feature X' and while you're doing that, check everything else to see if it broke anything else." Now, if while testing 'new feature X' you discover something else that's definitely impacted (turn off "X" and see if it still occurs), a tester had better report it.
Given what has managed to get past the CE program in the past, I have to wonder if the CE program is more of a pacifier than a tool.They should do like D's Cutting Edge Program for testing software, then report and post any issues.
Think about the logistics of that.... "We'd like you to test 'new feature X' and while you're doing that, check everything else to see if it broke anything else." Now, if while testing 'new feature X' you discover something else that's definitely impacted (turn off "X" and see if it still occurs), a tester had better report it.
Those companies have bugs that their customers complain loudly about as well.I think most companies in fact do that. Cisco, Synposys, Cadence, etc would be out of business if they released stuff like Dish does.
And when you list a bug with them they acknowledge it and immediately give you a workaround or a patch and issue an update with a list of what was fixed and what is still outstanding and ETRs for critical issues and infinitum. What does Dish do?Those companies have bugs that their customers complain loudly about as well.