Social Feed

Y
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Here's something that would be nice. TCM, AMC, Fox Movie Channel, Hallmark Movie Channel (not that I'd watch that, but it follows the theme), in other words all the non-premium movie channels, available in a stand alone package that $5 to $7 a month.

This is more of a wish list thing than something that I expect to happen.
19 Replies · 2217 views
D
Such a packaged would erode the value of the current, standard, packages in which they are included. Those non-premium movie channels are sometimes the ONLY reason some people would trade-up. Also, the owners of those channels do not want to be ala carte or in a very small package as they would lose a lot of money by no longer getting paid per subscriber to the far more popular packages in which they are currently available.

Keep in mind that EVERY channel really wants to be included in the least expensive, lowest priced, bottom tier package for that has the greatest number of potential viewers for they would get a payment on almost 100% of the subscribers and the highest potential ratings meaning they can charge more for the advertising.
TheKrell
Also, the owners of those channels do not want to be ala carte or in a very small package as they would lose a lot of money by no longer getting paid per subscriber to the far more popular packages in which they are currently available.
You are probably right but this drives me CRAZY! Why in *&^% are advertisers so stupid that they mindlessly keep paying for maximum potential eyeballs rather than actual eyeballs? If I were paying the bill, I would demand to pay only for actual/confirmed eyeballs. If the channel owners can't give me a valid number, then I would go to somebody who could.
MikeD-C05
I wish they could let us save $5.00 on our top programming packs and let us opt out of our regional sports packs like they do on the top 120 vs the top 120 plus pack. I would love to save $5.00 on something I don't watch anyway. I want more programming that is available like in top 200 pack ,but I could care less about sports. If they can do it on the top 120 ,why not top 200 and top 250?
Mojo Jojo
I wish they could let us save $5.00 on our top programming packs and let us opt out of our regional sports packs like they do on the top 120 vs the top 120 plus pack. I would love to save $5.00 on something I don't watch anyway. I want more programming that is available like in top 200 pack ,but I could care less about sports. If they can do it on the top 120 ,why not top 200 and top 250?

We decided to drop from America's Top 250 to Dish Latino Dos because of all the increases over the past two years. We were paying $7 for receivers due to the phone line credits; then, it went up $7 to $14. Then, America's Top 250 got that $2 increase; then, it just got that $5 increase. Just counting this is $14 in increases. I miss those phone line credits.
MikeD-C05
We decided to drop from America's Top 250 to Dish Latino Dos because of all the increases over the past two years. We were paying $7 for receivers due to the phone line credits; then, it went up $7 to $14. Then, America's Top 250 got that $2 increase; then, it just got that $5 increase. Just counting this is $14 in increases. I miss those phone line credits.


Yes the phone credits were nice , but alas no more.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 5 views
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
1 Replies · 9 views
Bobby
Rest in peace.
JSheridan
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I know HipKat said that they were working on conversions but we got the official news yesterday right from Dish that starting next month all DMA's will be on the western arc, and all customers will be assigned to that. That's gonna mean a lot of customers around here aren't gonna get Dish unless there are exceptions. Too many mountains and trees.
173 Replies · 4933 views
S
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jimbo
Even if you are broadcasting old SD-only shows, I would think advertisers would still want their commercials to look good.
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Mister B
Advertisers on SD channels are probably Far and Few, very hard to find, they have very few viewers to watch them.
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
S
I watch mostly SD channels (H&I, Start and ION, etc.). There are plenty of advertisers, this time of the year it is mostly Medicare Advantage plans, auto extended warranties and the occasional walk-in-tub. They know who is watching.
can't forget the little blue m&m's
charlesrshell
can't forget the little blue m&m's
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
T
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Foxbat
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
Because he didn't have a fleet of reusable rockets. Starlink works because SpaceX is able to launch hundreds (thousands?) of their Starlink satellites for what a single geostationary Internet satellite costs to build and launch on a disposable launcher.
T
But how is it reusable if it's disposable
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
That's what my wife calls my Viagra!!
My gf is 29 years younger than me :shh
Almighty1
Why didn't Charlie end up launching starlink
He does not have the resources aka $$$ compared to Elon Musk as in reality, Elon can eat Charlie for lunch or even mop the floor with Charlie if he wanted to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
S
ment to 20 yrs dam phone
Marques Brownlee
· posted in Marques Brownlee
0 Replies · 4 views
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68633 Replies · 2679055 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
FTA4PA
Strange Days - Nazareth
gms49ers
Dancing Days - Led Zeppelin
dishstaller
Dancing in the Street - Van Halen
long_time_Dish
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
  • Like
Reactions: gms49ers
Bobby
Bakers Street - Gerry Rafferty
Let me fix that for you:
Baker Street - Gerry Rafferty
osu1991
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Movie Talk
53 Replies · 10077 views
long_time_Dish
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
K
Also watched part 2 about a week or so ago after rewatching part 1. It's not as faithful to the book as I was hoping for. Part 1 stayed fairly faithful to the novel, but part 2 took some liberties that I felt were rather excessively non-novel. It looks like a prequel series will happen before part 3. My issue is: there's no prequel that was written as a novel, so what will it be pulled from? Or will it just be "based loosely" on the novel?
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
long_time_Dish
There is a bunch of other Dune written by Kevin J Anderson and Brian Herbert (Franks son). I think the series in production is taken from one of their books about the Bene Gesserit.
Correct. I've read all of them (yes, it took awhile, better part of a year, in my spare time). And they can't really consider or classify a series about the Bene Gesserit as a prequel. Sure, I suppose they can call it that, if they want to, because it begins before the time of Paul Atredies, but it's still a stretch. It's a Dune-related novel, not a prequel as we generally think of prequels...
long_time_Dish
Well, it looks good! I just hope they stayed close to the trilogy, but it doesn't look like it.
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 9 views