Does not matter if not a true RSN for that area. What is being asked here is that the extended coverage be bought, not the standard coverage. There is a difference there. But what the $13 is for, is the MSP, if outside the viewing area, which again, does not pay for the extended area if chosen to be blacked out by the channel owner. The whole complaint seems to be on Channel owners want more money, for the same product, that an area may be entitled to, but is not exactly local. I am not saying it is a bad thing for the channel owner to want that, after all, business is business, but I sure as hell wouldn't want a higher payment because of that. It all comes down to the mantra Charlie has been spouting for years(and Mike White now too), "Most channels, for the best value". Is the small market of ALB worth the higher fees, for EXTENDED coverage?