Here is a link to an old newsgroup thread archived by Google from many, many, many years ago. You may be very interested in Howard Taylor's comments about the Corotor design and KU performance in Zeno's 9/7/98 post.
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/rec.video.satellite.tvro/VBo9upN2tac
Interesting thread. In particular Bert's post on 8/8/98:
Remember focal point should normally be 1/4 of a wavelength inside the
feedhorn for a prime focus feed. 1/4 of a wavelenght for C-band is 3
times longer than 1/4 for Ku, i.e. for C-band 20 mm and for Ku 6 mm (are
you still using inches over there?) Maybe thats why the sliding.
1/4 wavelength is not 1/4 inch for C-band, it's more like 3/4 of an inch! So if that's correct, then the LNBF+scalar should be almost half an inch closer to the face of the dish. Can anyone here confirm the correct placement? I've read 1/4 inch in many places, but I could see how people might start thinking 1/4 inch instead of 1/4 wavelength!!
Unfortunately that page isn't clear on exactly how to place the scalar, only that it needs to be set correctly:
You simply set the top edge of the scalar ring even with the line that corresponds to your correct f/D setting

The "top edge" could be the flat part of the scalar, but I assume it's the edge with the lip, not the flat back part. Generally that would make sense to me, because we cannot see the markings where the flat back part of the scalar ring is, when installing.
The reason this is confusing to me is because I've got a bunch of different scalar rings, and they do not have the exact same lip length. I suppose it's because the scalars I have are generally cheap garbage.
Does Chaparral even print the f/D ratios on their feeds like we see on a typical LNBF? I have one not in use, with no f/D markings.
If the image in the PDF is incorrect, please advise. This was always my starting point for setting the scalar fed ratio and the final optimized C-band placement was usually quite similar. Observations? Suggestions? Comments?
I've read conflicting information from various sources, which is why I started this thread to verify the correct setup. Unfortunately every LNBF I have didn't come with instructions to indicate where to line up the scalar ring to the LNBF's stamped f/D ratios. Hopefully someone reads this and has instructions on it.
As the thread you linked to points out, it comes down to manually tuning it for your use case and particular dish. However I think it's worthwhile to know exactly how to configure everything in the "ideal case (theory)" as opposed to the "real world (practical)".
If the f/D ratio in my previous post with the picture is set correctly at 0.36 and that's what the dish's f/D ratio is, then everything is good. If the f/D ratio is actually 0.39 or 0.40, then it means the scalar ring is not filtering / choking the entire surface of the dish's reflective area, but a smaller portion of it. Likely this would mean more susceptibility to terrestrial interference and/or less overall gain on weaker signals, correct?
As always, thanks guys
sgs