Social Feed

Proc
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV General Forum
As I was paying my D* bill online the other day, it got me to thinking. Should I compare the local cable companies prices and see if I am getting the most for my money? Should I look for a deal?

It seems everyone is always after a deal. We want the best service at the best price, right?

It always intrigues me when someone says, "X cable company has a great deal!", Is there really such a thing as a "deal" in this business? Sure, you can negotiate a rate with cable or whoever, but in the long run, the price seems to catch up in the end.

I am not a D* cheerleader, and despite some bumps in the road, I have for the most part, been satisfied with the service and programming and program credits here and there help out.

I remember paying under $25 for basic cable. I am now in the $85 a month region, bill-wise, and wonder how much of more of my monthly income will be spend on TV in the next 5 years?

DVR's, Sunday Ticket, pay per view...all choices not available years ago, beckon at the wallet now. I was thinking I might be better off just subscribing to the whole $99.99 package and be done with it.

Is there a price point you won't pass to pay for your D* service?
31 Replies · 3891 views
M
Unfortunately everything is is all about supply and demand. it is an excuse to just raise prices. Just like the new lease nonsense- trends change everything. Every company does it. In this case we can thank all the people that "have to have" all 4 HD channels. Their willingness to pay extra for brand new, not fully tested service is setting the new higher prices we are seeing.
Great concept... to offer "some HD channels" that cost more money, but ALL the rest of the channels are reg SD. What good is that? It isn't like ordering HBO or other premium channels that look the same when you change the channel, this HD is supposed to look soooo much beter that reg HD. I wouldn't be able to stand that. These HD channels look good, but blea, all the other channels look like crap.*sarcastic*
Like eating steak and the chef comes out and replaces it with hamburger helper in mid-meal.
Really, I haven't met one person yet that has been able to tell the difference.. Seriously. I have done the old pepsi challenge with SD and HD side by side and so far nobody can tell the difference. Personally, there are too many factors to interfere with the HD plan. The Tv itself, the service provider, and the station that is transmitting the signal. Just like there are different levels of digital compression that we have seen all over the dial, there is no set standard in the level HD is being broadcasted.
That whole "every TV must be HD by 2007" is a load because alot of areas haven't even gone full SD yet no less HD...this is just the testing phase. I'm gonna say maybe 2010 or so. But then there will be alot more HD channels and newer better equipment. But the price standard is being set in motion now. So choose wisely.
S
Got it. Yes, Florida has been this way since I got here in '74. Nothing new.
L
mirage426 said:
Unfortunately everything is is all about supply and demand. it is an excuse to just raise prices. Just like the new lease nonsense- trends change everything. Every company does it. In this case we can thank all the people that "have to have" all 4 HD channels. Their willingness to pay extra for brand new, not fully tested service is setting the new higher prices we are seeing.
Great concept... to offer "some HD channels" that cost more money, but ALL the rest of the channels are reg SD. What good is that? It isn't like ordering HBO or other premium channels that look the same when you change the channel, this HD is supposed to look soooo much beter that reg HD. I wouldn't be able to stand that. These HD channels look good, but blea, all the other channels look like crap.*sarcastic*
Like eating steak and the chef comes out and replaces it with hamburger helper in mid-meal.
Really, I haven't met one person yet that has been able to tell the difference.. Seriously. I have done the old pepsi challenge with SD and HD side by side and so far nobody can tell the difference. Personally, there are too many factors to interfere with the HD plan. The Tv itself, the service provider, and the station that is transmitting the signal. Just like there are different levels of digital compression that we have seen all over the dial, there is no set standard in the level HD is being broadcasted.
That whole "every TV must be HD by 2007" is a load because alot of areas haven't even gone full SD yet no less HD...this is just the testing phase. I'm gonna say maybe 2010 or so. But then there will be alot more HD channels and newer better equipment. But the price standard is being set in motion now. So choose wisely.

I agree with some of what you said but lets look at this from the point of view of a person who is tied into this business for a second. First HDTV channels take bandwidth and lots of it.

Now also understand that when these packages were created HDTV wasn't even close to being in as many homes as HDTV is today and broadcasting HDTV was also more expensive. Now lets look at this even more now.

HDTV broadcasts require extra channels that aren't in use today thus using bandwidth on all providers. Now we must consider the fact that it costs the channels extra money to host the channel on a satellite to allow the cable and sat companies to pick them up and feed them through their systems. So ESPN HD and ESPN 2 HD must be hosted on a satellite and they pay for the amount of bandwidth they need not the channel and also keep in mind that bandwidth is limited so at some point new HDTV channels might not have any bandwidth left so other ways must be found like going to the FCC to request more transponders for hosting use which I might add isn't easy to get done. This costs money for something only HDTV customers can benefit from.

Now we must also look at the fact that the channel also needs hardware to process both SDTV and HDTV feeds, crop for SD among many other things. They need more expensive uplinking hardware to get the feeds to those hosting satellites as they are now sending much more data that also needs more error correction as well. Now if the channel shows movies all those movies must be converted from film into an HDTV format and this again costs money just for us HDTV viewers. Now what if the channel does live sporting events. Well lets see now.

Live sporting events now require different more expensive mobile trucks that can support HDTV. These trucks costs millions to buy or a company can rent them as they are available but that is also quite expensive but trucks for renting are limited as you might guess. The other option is to have the existing trucks you own converted to HDTV and this also costs at least a million bucks per truck. Now todo a decent HDTV broadcast you now need to hire more people to handle the extra load of dealing with both an HDTV and an SDTV broadcast. Now beyond that they must also buy new more expensive HDTV cameras that costs in the hundreds of thousands of dollars per camera. Most football games require at least 5 of these if not more.

I think this gives you all an idea that what we HDTV customers get isn't free and many keep saying why should we pay twice for ESPN to get ESPN HD. Well they again fail to understand that all the games that ESPN broadcasts in HDTV cost more money todo in HDTV compared to SDTV. Like I said above ESPN must also pay more for the bandwidth to host ESPN HD.

I believe that as times go by these channels will not be in extra packages but for now because it costs more todo HDTV the only way we will get more networks to offer HDTV feeds to us is if they have a way to get paid for that extra cost. I also believe that without an HDTV package we wouldn't have hardly any sports in HDTV. Also people might say that Comcast doesn't charge extra for HDTV but that is a bad way of thinking because you are indeed paying for it. Or should I say every Comcast customer is paying a very very very very small share of it but that is besides the point. Just don't forget that ESPN is getting paid by Comcast. I might be one of the few that thinks this but ESPN is quite a value for everything they offer considering what types of sports they cover along with their HDTV live sports coverage. Yes they could do much more in HDTV but compared to pre ESPN HD we now have tons and I know all of you would agree that having a few hundred sporting events in HDTV each year is better than not having them.

Edit...Does anyone else remember the days when Discovery HD Theater costs 7.99/month all by its little itty bitty self because I do.
P
I know I'd been thinking of cutting my programming package lately and after reading this thread I actually looked through the channel list and I didn't watch a single channel in the TC plus. So I logged in today and dropped to TC and HBO. Cut Starz while I was at it. Got my total down to bout 78 bucks a month which saved me 15 bucks per month. Doesn't sound like much but if you start to trim the fat from all of your bills you can save quite a bit. Now I just have to trim down that cell phone bill.
S
Auctually I was comparing Directv Cable and Dish to see who was cheaper, in the end I realized that I would be saving about 10 dollars a month with Dish HD Platinum compared to my Total Choice Premier that I have right now along the HD package, plus I would be getting more because Dish has more movie channels like HBO Comedy, I will most likely switch.
TRG
TRG
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Now that I'm retired, obviously I have different health care insurance. I take 2 prescriptions. With my old insurance I didn't have to pay for either of them, now I do. It's not a huge amount but it led me to dig a little into the cost of prescription medications. I have been using Walgreens for the longest time. But what I found was that Walgreens price is 4.8 times more for one of my prescriptions and the other is 2.3 percent more compared to the lowest price pharmacy. If you pay for prescription medications you might want to have a look at trumprx and see if you can get a lower price.


Screenshot from 2026-10-22 15-43-53.webp
Screenshot from 2026-10-22 15-23-34.webp
2 Replies · 18 views
comfortably_numb
I run them through several different providers to see who has the lowest cost

Usually it's Walmart or Sam's + GoodRx

Also...


You can also price them through the CareCard and WellRx apps.

Sometimes Amazon Pharmacy is cheapest.
  • Like
Reactions: TRG
K
I am fortunate that the couple things I take end up being no cost to me. So far!

I get shipped 90 day supply automatically by CVS via my Medicare Advantage plan.
  • Like
Reactions: TRG
N
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
My OTA is not working anymore. This started after the latest update. I have the OTA dongle with a OTA antenna that I've been using for years. My hopper does not recognize the dongle anymore and when I go to the OTA setting, it has a screen that says to plug a dongle into the USB. I tried unplugging and plugging back, in the same usb port and other ports. The Hopper does not recognize it. Anyone have same issue?
202 Replies · 5257 views
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
B
Anyone heard any updates on this, I'm still having the issue so thought I'd check in.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Almighty1
Anyone heard any updates on this, I'm still having the issue so thought I'd check in.
No updates but if you can get DISH Technical Operations to roll you back to H710 or earlier even though H708 would be best because it also eliminates another problem like in this comment, you will also no longer have the problem as long as you don't update manually or forced to any new version until the problem is fixed as the problem started in H711 and still exist in H712 and H713.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishstaller
Installed an off-air antenna a couple days ago for a customer who had just cancelled his Dish service. He had a dual off-air adapter and gave it to me. Cool. I'll keep it on the truck....might come in handy. Got to admit I don't watch anything as far as live tv goes anymore. Even if we have severe weather, our local channels will have a live feed on Youtube.
navychop
In other news, it was announced that the software fix for the two tin cans and a string will not be forthcoming. A hardware fix is required. However, that fix will let you receive stations from a gazillion miles away.

Truck roll charges may apply. Two year commitment required.
brittanygarden
Hi all. If you were using a single tuner USB OTA adapter that is no longer working, please PM me. Thanks. :)
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
9 Replies · 80 views
dfergie
Loose lips sink ships for her...
teachsac
Dang. That had to hurt. I would have not handled it that well. Surprised it wasn't brought up by Heff at the challenge.
dfergie
First rule - if you get a clue follow it immediately, 2nd - keep your stuff with you in a strange place, 3rd - pay attention to your ride... (pre first - don't go if you think you might not want to stay Rob)
teachsac
Loved the tribal🤣
Former member 209992
Last reply · posted in SatelliteGuys Support Center
For some reason, the satelliteguys.us site is loading a lot slower than usual on both Chrome on my Asus laptop and Safari on my iPhone.
I'm also seeing longer appearances of the blue bar at the top and the "3 blue bars" loading symbol.
Is anyone else also having the same problem? Thanks in advance.
550 Replies · 19059 views
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
Just a heads up... I just patched our PHP to close the major PHP exploit announced this morning.

Now on PHP 8.4.27 (cli) (built: Oct 20 2026 00:00:00)
harshness
More specifically, these:



A more scholarly story is here:

navychop
"WARNING Will Robinson!"
Don in CT
Just a heads up... I just patched our PHP to close the major PHP exploit announced this morning.

Now on PHP 8.4.27 (cli) (built: Oct 20 2026 00:00:00)
When I heard about this exploit I was wondering how quick you would be on it. :D
Scott Greczkowski
When I heard about this exploit I was wondering how quick you would be on it. :D
12 minutes after the patch was release I had it patched. :)
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
68572 Replies · 2675895 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
dishstaller
If You Don't Know Me By Now - Simply Red
Bobby
You'll Always Be Loved By Me - Brooks & Dunn
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
sdfntx
You'll Always Be the One - Dinah Shore
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby
gms49ers
Still the One - Orleans
  • Like
Reactions: long_time_Dish
long_time_Dish
One Toke Over The Line - Brewer and Shipley
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in Internet Television (IPTV) Discussion Forum
I was reading this article


That said this-
Last summer, for the first time, streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime claimed the largest share of the television viewing audience, surpassing both cable and broadcast TV. Streaming captured 34.8 percent of July viewers, according to Nielsen data, compared to 34.4 percent for cable and 21.6 percent for broadcast.

And then, sometime in the second half of 2022, cord-cutters became the majority. The share of cable and satellite television subscribers dipped to 48 percent, according to a report from Samba TV, a television technology company.


Now I do not consider those with YTTV and the likes, Cord Cutters, but they still do not have Traditional Cable/Satellite delivered Live TV, so I decided to do the math.

There are, now, 129 Million Households in the United States.

In 2015, there were 100 Million Cable/Sat Subscribers , no streaming Live TV Service.

Today, there are 66 Million Live TV subscribers, including Cable, Satellite and Streaming.

Roughly, Streaming Live TV has 14 Million subs including all of them.

So that means, Cable/Satellite now has, roughly, 51 Million Households

So in just 8 years, lost 49% of their subscribers and by the end of this year, expected sub count to be, roughly, 45 million households.

That means a total loss of 55% since 2015 at the end of 2023.

But out of 129 Million households, 45 million will mean only 35% will get Cable/Satellite Delivered Live TV by the end of 2023.

Imagine what 2024 will be like.
878 Replies · 71362 views
  • Wow
Reactions: MikeD-C05
Bruce
Sony is discontinuing it's last 4K disc player, Panasonic has been rumored to be doing the same, the end of physical media is unfortunately, about to happen.

  • Angry
  • Sad
Reactions: ncted and navychop
navychop
Got a Sony 700 at WM dot commie.

I think.

Ordered, anyway. Amazon let me go thru entire process but then said no inventory.

Hopefully,, WM will come thru.
dishstaller
Sony is discontinuing it's last 4K disc player, Panasonic has been rumored to be doing the same, the end of physical media is unfortunately, about to happen.
Hate to hear that. If you don't physically have something in your hand, you don't really own it.
  • Like
Reactions: navychop
Bruce
Hate to hear that. If you don't physically have something in your hand, you don't really own it.
Even a physical disc purchase is considered a license, just extremely harder to pull access vs digital.

But once new players are no longer sold and older players quit working, that takes care of the access to your library.

See LaserDiscs for one example of that happening.
ncted
Sony is discontinuing it's last 4K disc player, Panasonic has been rumored to be doing the same, the end of physical media is unfortunately, about to happen.

I am so done with Sony on so many levels. This is just one small piece of it.
M
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
Interesting article about the work being done to develope an ATSC 3 converter box. Yes it does mention affordable.
9 Replies · 296 views
navychop
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
primestar31
DEATH TO NEXGEN!
star trek GIF


It's dead, they just don't know it yet. They killed it by forcing DRM on it, and that TOTALLY botched implementing it.

There is absolutely NO compelling reason for anybody to switch to ATSC3.0. They only want it as a total and complete money grab.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA and navychop
navychop
I truly hope you are right.
  • Like
Reactions: FTA4PA
Mister B
What bothers me is the total waste of broadcasting spectrum in this very crowded market. It has been almost three years now since KFOX converted their broadcast tower to ATSC 3.0 and moved all of their channels to other towers causing noticeable degradation of the picture quality.
I have a Sony TV with 3.0 capabilities but still use the 1.0 version of locals due to the fact that one or all of the 3.0 channels are often missing or unwatchable. In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.
The only thing that could motivate me to be interested in 3.0 would be if all of the minor networks (diginets) could be in at least 720P rather than blurry ultra-compressed 480i.
Three years is long enough to waste one of the few available RF frequencies in the area for this trial.
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.
navychop
In this city of 800K I doubt that more than a few hundred even know about ATSC 3.0.

They might notice the hand going into their pocket for their wallet.
navychop
It is time to either move on with this experiment or call it quits.

QFT. Of course, my preference involves a curb and some kicking.
Van
Van
Last reply · posted in What's Cooking?
Who says dinner or lunch has to be the only good meals of the day?

Honey butter grits with scrambled eggs and grilled boneless pork ribs on flakey biscuits washed down with cranberry juice.
6631 Replies · 379746 views
TRG
TRG
Wound up at the Waffle House this morning. Got the two egg breakfast with coffee.

1622.webp
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie and Mr Tony
dfergie
Speaking of waffles, I'm going to put my mini waffle iron on stove so I'll remember to make waffles in the morning... Had some last week, been awhile.
dfergie
Dos cackleberrys over easy on top of 2 corned beef hash patties fried in skillet... Chocolate milk.
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: TRG and Bobby
TRG
TRG
Cold morning today, only 32 degrees. Fired up the oven and made cinnamon rolls (from a tube) and a pot of coffee.
  • Like
Reactions: dfergie
TRG
TRG
2 egg burrito with bacon and a side of hashbrowns. Coffee.

1645.webp