For the name "Big10" to have any relevance, will the two division cellar dwellers be cast out each year?
2010 NCAA Football Season
- Thread starter Ronnie-
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 3K
- Views 141K
ouch...I think the ACC already has those two taken.
unfortunately it's been all too true this year
Big 10 already rethinking the names, apparently the alumni have given these names two thumbs down.
Interesting tidbit - Big Ten is playing the SEC in 4 bowl games this year. In the past 5 seasons the Big Ten has defeated the SEC in more bowl games than not. 7-5 I believe. (I could be off by a digit). The record would be better if it weren't for that "Evil School From The South".
Interesting tidbit - Big Ten is playing the SEC in 4 bowl games this year. In the past 5 seasons the Big Ten has defeated the SEC in more bowl games than not. 7-5 I believe. (I could be off by a digit). The record would be better if it weren't for that "Evil School From The South".
I think the ACC already has those two taken.
Hmm while that is a little funny, the ACC has the Coastal and the Atlantic.... the Big 10 or whatever is in question and yeah I think Who and Cares fits good...
Nah, it was alot funny!!!!Hmm while that is a little funny, the ACC has the Coastal and the Atlantic.... the Big 10 or whatever is in question and yeah I think Who and Cares fits good...
But yes, the names the big 10 picked were bad. Hopefully they change it.
I for one hope the change it, when it comes to conference supremacy, Its the SEC and the Big whatever. I simply pay more attention to them I guess out of the conferences aside from mine.
Nah, it was alot funny!!!!
But yes, the names the big 10 picked were bad. Hopefully they change it.
I for one hope the change it, when it comes to conference supremacy, Its the SEC and the Big whatever. I simply pay more attention to them I guess out of the conferences aside from mine.
You REALLY think the SEC was supreme this year ?
A quick glance at the current standings show that EVERY conference other than the ACC use East and West that have divisions.
Well the Big12 is down, The Big Ten had a big year, The Pac10 had Oregon and Stanford and the ACC joined the big east. So It was really between the SEC and Big Ten this year. It sucks they beat themselves up so much to miss out on the title game, given to the weaker pac 10.
I think he is saying it should be a BIG10/SEC NC game, no PAC10 need apply.
I don't feel this way, Why should Oregon be left out ?
I think the only two conferences that could make a legitimate claim to it this year are the SEC and the Big Ten. Yes, Oregon is in the title game (against a SEC team I might add), but the rest of the conference is lacking.
Of the two I mentioned, call me biased, but I think the SEC is the best, it is close though.
They are a very good team, maybe even the best, but they had a much easier road to the NCG than teams in the Big Ten or SEC was his point (I think, and agree if so)
I do care somewhat since I'm a big fan of the sport... the current names are beyond stupid and some what of a kick in the face towards a few teams depending on which side they are on.
I meant it sucks the big ten beat themselves up so much as they would of been a shoe in for the mnc.
Basically what everyone else said
I meant it sucks the big ten beat themselves up so much as they would of been a shoe in for the mnc.
Basically what everyone else said
That happens every year in the Big Ten and SEC.
Doesnt negate his point, and is why many of us continue to crow about conference supremacy year after year.
Your conference had 1 team with less than 2 losses.
Now your gonna tell me how 4-5 teams could beat anyone in any other conference.................................................................
