Yes and that loss includes the SLING tv subs included in the sub numbers totals. I do find it funny, how the average revenue per sub goes up each year, which is coincidently timed after the yearly price hikes for programming and or fee increases or both. The profits almost always go up no matter what happens. Couldn't be those pesky numerous DISH fees added in with the yearly Programming price hikes could it?Looks like you were right, lost 23,000 according to the release. Of course, revenue and EPS up on increased costs. I don't see how they (not just them but ALL MPVDs) can keep this up.
Yes and that loss includes the SLING tv subs included in the sub numbers totals. I do find it funny, how the average revenue per sub goes up each year, which is coincidently timed after the yearly price hikes for programming and or fee increases or both. The profits almost always go up no matter what happens. Couldn't be those pesky numerous DISH fees added in with the yearly Programming price hikes could it?
I think that within the next 5 - 8 years the pay tv industry will change ,because more and more of the core cable audience -older generation- will continue to die out. Add to that the changes brought by the Millennials -who don't sub to pay tv and or will never sub. The continue price gouging by the industry and the continued fee creations and increases by the pay tv providers themselves , will bring the end of the present model. Even the FCC is now saying that pay tv boxes should be now open to any 3rd party company to manufacture, to avoid the subs having to pay the monthly fees that have increased like 185% in the last 22 years. This is all a recipe for a big changes in the near future. The present model will not stand for long.Yes, I have to agree. I don't think they (Dish) are the only ones, it is basically the standard model in the industry. Now at maturity, cable/DBS are just moving the subscribers around from one provider to another like a ping pong game, with some attrition (cord cutting, cord nevers). I don't see how this can go on and on and on. Time will tell I suppose.
I agree. That $70.00 a month loss is not very good for profits,but the profits seem to keep going up as does the average revenue per sub , who stay with satellite -due to yearly programming pack increases and of course the ever expanding fees that DISH charges. Hell just upgrading to the new Hopper 3 and a couple of joeys from a Vip 722k dvr and a couple of 211ks would increase your monthly fees from $21.00 a month( $7.00 dvr fee + $14.00 for two 211ks ) to $29.00 a month($15.00 dvr fee + $14.00 for two joeys).Losing 170,000 $90 monthly subscribers but gaining 150,000 $20 subscribers. I have to think the $20-25 subscribers aren't very profitable.
I think that within the next 5 - 8 years the pay tv industry will change ,because more and more of the core cable audience -older generation- will continue to die out. Add to that the changes brought by the Millennials -who don't sub to pay tv and or will never sub. The continue price gouging by the industry and the continued fee creations and increases by the pay tv providers themselves , will bring the end of the present model. Even the FCC is now saying that pay tv boxes should be now open to any 3rd party company to manufacture, to avoid the subs having to pay the monthly fees that have increased like 185% in the last 22 years. This is all a recipe for a big changes in the near future. The present model will not stand for long.
Unfortunately, I agree with you. Different delivery system , same old tricks to gouge the public. But I hope that tv ala cart will take hold like it has now in Canada.I would agree that the present model will probably change, however, I doubt it will lead to the end of price gouging. Hollywood and the entertainment industry control the content and they are not going to give it away for free. Once Cable/Satellite delivery dies or becomes irrelevant, streaming controls and prices will increase dramatically to offset it..
That's the one going to your Western arc I bet.EchoStar has announced their quarterly earnings.
SEC Link: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1415404/000141540416000014/0001415404-16-000014-index.htm
Things are looking good for them.
Looks like their biggest (current) problem is lack of broadband capacity- their Hughes segment.
They are rocketing up satellites like the Fourth of July this year and should be hitting on all 8 cylinders by next year if things stay on schedule.
EchoStar 23 (rebuilt from the EchoStar 13 platform that was in storage) is a BSS satellite. It will launch to 45 West for Brazilian service in the third quarter.
They have canceled their contract for the Dish (owned) EchoStar 15 at 45W.
So, we may see EchoStar 15 move back to US service later this year.
They chatted about upcoming HD......what happened to that retailer chat that was suppose to go on today
what happened to that retailer chat that was suppose to go on today
That's the one going to your Western arc I bet.
Not E16.
Makes no sense to move 2 satellites.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
So why the heck are they even bothering with E18 going to the 61.5 if nothing is wrong?I had not looked for some time. Both EchoStar 15 and 16 are at 61.5W. So, they moved it from 45W sometime after EchoStar returned it to Dish.