Scott,
I just went to the same page and Did not get the same page results. It now states FSC HD MAY be available soon. Gotta love the word "SOON"
![]()
John
Yup looks like it is.![]()
Yup they changed it since DISH did not announce the channel yet. But if you notice DISH is the only provider where you enter info and there is no option to request the channel from the provider.![]()
Yup they changed it since DISH did not announce the channel yet. But if you notice DISH is the only provider where you enter info and there is no option to request the channel from the provider.![]()
From what I hear it will be a subscription channel anyways. But its good for those that love Soccer.![]()
From what I hear it will be a subscription channel anyways. But its good for those that love Soccer.![]()
Actually you might be correct, I get confused by all this Fox Sports stuff.I dont think FSC HD will be a subscription channel,its gonna be in AT250 pack,like it is now,but for new FSC+ channel launching in march we gonna have to pay...its only my opinion...
![]()
Some Internet speculation is that FS Plus will end up in "Sports Packages" rather than as an a la carte channel, because that can be more profitable for Fox. However, it is unclear whether that speculation includes all the relevant factors.
db2 said:On one hand you'd have to imagine Fox would get a lot more money per sub if they used the Setanta model (Providers charge $14.95/month).
Good except for here in the USA.How well did the Setanta model work for Setanta?
That's an interesting thought. On one hand you'd have to imagine Fox would get a lot more money per sub if they used the Setanta model (Providers charge $14.95/month). On the other hand if they were put into the sports pack (Dish charges $5.99/month) they would probably get less per sub but end up with a lot more subs.
If Charlie puts FSC+ in the sports pack, I would be sorely tempted to get it!
Otherwise, no way.