This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Live streaming will soon be irrelevant!


This would be better:

 
A few days ago I received an email promoting the regular Hulu, Disney+, ESPN+ bundle. It was the usual bundle discount price that basically gives you free ESPN+ ($5 off the normal price). If I didn't need ESPN+ last month, I certainly don't need it now. *sheesh*
 

Sports may not be back in 60 to 90 days. Think more like at least six months and maybe longer than that.
 

Um, I'd look at rates, not count. The susceptible population of the US is 5 times the population of Italy. For the rate to be the same, the count would be 5 times greater.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: N5XZS and navychop
Um, I'd look at rates, not count. The susceptible population of the US is 5 times the population of Italy. For the rate to be the same, the count would be 5 times greater.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You aren't wrong but I believe that you would also need to factor in lower population densities and greater geographic distances in the US when comparing rates to Italy. But then again maybe not, that's why we have epidemiologists.
 
Um, I'd look at rates, not count. The susceptible population of the US is 5 times the population of Italy. For the rate to be the same, the count would be 5 times greater.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You aren't wrong but I believe that you would also need to factor in lower population densities and greater geographic distances in the US when comparing rates to Italy. But then again maybe not, that's why we have epidemiologists.

The data chart I posted was merely to show the curve of cases (that we are far from a peak), not numerical equivalencies between the two countries.

With the lack of testing in the U.S. (just now starting to become more available), the actual numbers are certainly much, much higher here. If we were testing everyone, even those with minor symptoms and anyone who came in contact, since January like they did in S. Korea, the number of U.S. cases could very well be greater than Italy's by a factor of 10. That's why everything is being shutdown. We just don't know where or how prevelant the disease is here.
 
Reactions: TheKrell
I heard this morning who knows how many have it that have little or no synonyms of the bug? One guy said he didn't even have the cough, just a temp and tightness in his upper chest for a couple of days. He is still quarantined, as he was tested positive, but little issues. Also remember over a million people each year lose their lives from auto accidents and how many lose their lives from murders, or even the more common flu virus. One nice thing about TV, is you say at home and watch it. You do not have to out in front of people. Lots of entertainment in this day.
 
Um, I'd look at rates, not count. The susceptible population of the US is 5 times the population of Italy. For the rate to be the same, the count would be 5 times greater.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Median age in Italy is almost 48 years while here in the US is 37.......should be taking into account also.
 
Also remember over a million people each year lose their lives from auto accidents and how many lose their lives from murders, or even the more common flu virus.

In the US, the number of people that die in auto accidents isn't that high, it's less than 40k. Also, less than 40k die of firearm-related injuries.


The problem with COVID-19 is that without intervention, the death toll in the US was predicted to be over 4 million. That's more than the total annual deaths in the US, less than 3 million. I think the estimate for over people 70 was 4-8%. Oh, and influenza killed just over 55k in 2017.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: ncted and Zookster