Manhattan ver 3.4 where are we?

Pixl

Senior Member

Original poster

Pub Member / Supporter

Feb 27, 2010

1,902

67

Traverse City, Michigan

• Nov 11, 2011

• #1

The manhattan 3.4 thread got so long I lost where we are.
If I install 3.4 can I run a DiSEqC 1.2 motor AND a 1.0 or 1.1 switch ?

 

M

Mr Tony

SatelliteGuys Pro

Supporting Founder

Nov 17, 2003

1,944

7,722

Mankato, MN

• Nov 11, 2011

• #2

yes you can

 

Pixl

Senior Member

Original poster

Pub Member / Supporter

Feb 27, 2010

1,902

67

Traverse City, Michigan

• Nov 12, 2011

• #3

Ok.

Just seems to me there was still some motor/switch issue remaining or something to do with 22k

 

brentb636

SatelliteGuys Pro

Jun 24, 2006

4,278

6

5 miles N of Saugatuck, Mi

• Nov 12, 2011

• #4

I think there is an unresolved issue with some 22khz switch configurations, but I haven't had any problems in my setup, Jim .

 

Pixl

Senior Member

Original poster

Pub Member / Supporter

Feb 27, 2010

1,902

67

Traverse City, Michigan

• Nov 12, 2011

• #5

Do you know if it will control a universal lnb that calls for 22k for the high band, along with diseqc 1.0, 1.1, and motor 1.2 ?

 

brentb636

SatelliteGuys Pro

Jun 24, 2006

4,278

6

5 miles N of Saugatuck, Mi

• Nov 12, 2011

• #6

I tested that configuration and I believe it works. I only used about 3 sats though on Diseqc 1.2, since I prefer USALS for Ku motors. [edit] See post 31 of this thread, http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-air-fta-discussion/269067-manhattan-update-3-4-thread-4.html . You will see the problems that still seem to exist with the 22khz implementation. I believe it boils down to not being able to make settings "sticky", for each satellite. I might be wrong.

 

Last edited: Nov 12, 2011