The manhattan 3.4 thread got so long I lost where we are.
If I install 3.4 can I run a DiSEqC 1.2 motor AND a 1.0 or 1.1 switch ?
If I install 3.4 can I run a DiSEqC 1.2 motor AND a 1.0 or 1.1 switch ?
Manhattan ver 3.4 where are we?
- Thread starter Pixl
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 5
- Views 1K
- Status
Ok.
Just seems to me there was still some motor/switch issue remaining or something to do with 22k
Just seems to me there was still some motor/switch issue remaining or something to do with 22k
I think there is an unresolved issue with some 22khz switch configurations, but I haven't had any problems in my setup, Jim . 
Do you know if it will control a universal lnb that calls for 22k for the high band, along with diseqc 1.0, 1.1, and motor 1.2 ?
I tested that configuration and I believe it works. I only used about 3 sats though on Diseqc 1.2, since I prefer USALS for Ku motors. [edit] See post 31 of this thread, http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-air-fta-discussion/269067-manhattan-update-3-4-thread-4.html . You will see the problems that still seem to exist with the 22khz implementation. I believe it boils down to not being able to make settings "sticky", for each satellite. I might be wrong.
[edit] See post 31 of this thread, http://www.satelliteguys.us/free-air-fta-discussion/269067-manhattan-update-3-4-thread-4.html . You will see the problems that still seem to exist with the 22khz implementation. I believe it boils down to not being able to make settings "sticky", for each satellite. I might be wrong.
Last edited:
- Status
