This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Microsoft sues Motorola (for Android)

diogen

SatelliteGuys Pro
Original poster
Apr 16, 2007
4,313
0
First, Apple sued HTC and in some bizarre attempt to lift its image in the European phone market - Nokia.
The fallout: HTC "made a deal" with Microsoft with some undisclosed amount of money going to the Vole.

And now Microsoft sues Motorola for some 9 patents allegedly violated in the Android OS.
Microsoft sues Motorola, citing Android patent infringement

I believe there are a few conclusions that can be made based on these events:

1. The "revolution" in the smartphone business is over. It's evolution from here on...
2. The players are defined. Lines in sand drawn. The fight starts who will remain standing...
3. Negotiations times are over. From now going forward "the one with more lawyers wins"...

The most interesting - but understandable - in this game (to me) is the simple fact that nobody touches Samsung.
On one hand, they account for something like $52 in iPhone component costs (and more in iPod/iPad).
On the other hand, it looks like Windows Phone 7 would look miserable if not for Samsung handsets.
At the same time they make one of the best Android handset (Galaxy S), sell them with every carrier and are first out with a competing tablet (Galaxy Tab).

And neither Apple not Microsoft make a peep...

Isn't it nice to hold the balls of the former and current Gods in a sector in one hand and squeeze at will?

Diogen.
 
Last edited:
LOL... Apple feeling scared about ANDROID.. gotta love it
 
Since Samsung is a supplier to both Apple and Microsoft it's not unreasonable to assume that they have licenses to use the patents in question so no lawsuit is needed. This is a very common practice.
 
Since Samsung is a supplier to both Apple and Microsoft it's not unreasonable to assume...
Hmmm...
No doubt there is a non-zero chance Samsung has all the needed licenses.
I'll admit that if only not to be caught in the position to try and prove the negative. But is it reasonable?

When HTC made a deal with Microsoft it was plastered all over the tech (and not so tech) news sites...
It was reminded all over again that Apple and Microsoft have a cross licensing agreement since the time Microsoft saved Saint Jobses ass (and their own as well) with their investment...
Nokia went on record to state that all handset makers - sans Apple of course - licensed their patents. I bet Samsung, too...
The first multitouch patent - what Apple is bitching mostly about - is actually Synaptics' and Microsoft Surface is also quite a bit older than the iPhone...

And not a soul is claiming Samsung is in the clear in terms of patent violations.

Hence, from publicly available information it is not unreasonable to assume that Samsung doesn't give a f**k about the pontification of Saint Jobs for one reason - they can get away with it...

Diogen.
 
It's hard to find two companies that do business more differently than Apple and Microsoft.
The goal of making money is probably the only one common thing between them...

They even sue companies for opposite reason: Apple because its paranoid chief thinks other companies might
have something to do with Apple products; Microsoft - because a company doesn't have anything to do with it...
Motorola is 'open' to developing Windows Phone 7 devices, but only if the OS proves compelling -- Engadget

Buy a license to manufacture WinPho7 handsets and we won't sue you if you make Android ones, too.
Just like getting an almost free licence for Windows if you license Office.
With one small difference: this time around MS is the underdog...

Diogen.

EDIT:
Another way to picture the lawsuits galore
 
Last edited:
This is getting fun...

Motorola didn't want to stay behind and also "do something about it", i.e. suing somebody for something.
So, they picked Apple
Motorola suing Apple for patent infringement -- Engadget

Diogen.
 
RIM used to be called "lawsuit in motion" but they are angels (now?) compared to almost any company in that chart...

Diogen.
 
This looks like a smart move
HTC inks patent pact with Myhrvold's Intellectual Ventures ? The Register

Can't beat them - join them...

Diogen.
 
To continue the patent/lawsuit topic.

Just recently Novell sold off a good chunk of patents triggering rumors that Microsoft owns Unix
Novell acquired by Attachmate, sells some patents to Microsoft
It ain't that bad, as it turns out. The patents were purchased by a consortium including Microsoft, Apple, EMC and Oracle
882 Novell patents now shared by Microsoft, Apple, EMC, and Oracle

Apple's presence is understandable.
Oracle probably wants to make sure to never end up on the receiving end of a paten lawsuit from MS.
But what is EMC doing here?
Could this have something to do with VMWare that EMC made a killing on by first acquiring and then spinning off?
They are still the biggest shareholder if memory serves.

Next: Nortel patents
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/12/apple-google-rim-go-shopping-for-nortel-patents.ars

Diogen.
 

1. so far there has not been a decent mp3 player or overall meda player on android unless samsung is going to write one for us .
2. If they dont do anything about 1 then they have no hope of it selling. Why did ipod when the mp3 player wars , simple it ui and how it functioned blew everything else away.
 
I believe the times when MP3 players were judged by their ability to play music are long gone. Since iPod Touch, to be exact.

This is definitely a "me-too" attempt on Samsung part. They have a winner on their hands in the form of the Galaxy S.
Just strip it off its cell capabilities and call it a player. With apps support. Just what Apple did.

When playing audio on my Nexus One I use Winamp and couldn't care less about a native app.

Diogen.