Regional Sports Update

Dugan5468

Dugan5468

Thread Starter
SatelliteGuys Family
Original poster
Dec 23, 2011
74
6
Columbiana, Ohio
Just checking to see if there has been any movement on settling with the regional sports channels. I am missing my Pens on ATT SportsNet.......

Dugan
 
Bruce

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
9,916
11,134
Just checking to see if there has been any movement on settling with the regional sports channels. I am missing my Pens on ATT SportsNet.......

Dugan
There is almost no way the RSNs are coming back, Dish is making increased profits by getting rid of them without lowering prices and not that much loss of subscribers.

YTTV became profitable when then got rid of them, did not lower prices and they are gaining subs ( not many Live TV providers are gaining ) without the channels.

If you can only get satellite, DirecTV is your only option for the RSNs, but watch out for that second year increase, it is a doozy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05
TigerWoodsLibido

TigerWoodsLibido

SatelliteGuys Family
Feb 23, 2018
63
42
Springfield, OR
They won't come back until people switch to better providers....then Dish is dead and you'll be switching to a better provider that gives people what they want to pay for without their bill staying the same when they drop channels that they want.
 
T

twilliam66

SatelliteGuys Family
Oct 24, 2006
104
56
They won't come back until people switch to better providers....then Dish is dead and you'll be switching to a better provider that gives people what they want to pay for without their bill staying the same when they drop channels that they want.
According to you Dish should have been bankrupt back in 2019. And I'd like to know about this better provider that you talk about. Spectrum here raises their rates at least three times a year and Directv had a much larger rate increase than Dish did. Plus I got to pay Directv almost $8 for a regional sports network that they own.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Tampa8 and charlesrshell
ChadT41

ChadT41

THE BEST THERE HAS EVER BEEN
Pub Member / Supporter
Apr 20, 2014
11,076
4,485
Mesa, Az
They won't come back until people switch to better providers....then Dish is dead and you'll be switching to a better provider that gives people what they want to pay for without their bill staying the same when they drop channels that they want.
Not as many fans as you think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and charlesrshell
J

Joe The Dragon

SatelliteGuys Pro
Sep 19, 2008
602
58
There is almost no way the RSNs are coming back, Dish is making increased profits by getting rid of them without lowering prices and not that much loss of subscribers.

YTTV became profitable when then got rid of them, did not lower prices and they are gaining subs ( not many Live TV providers are gaining ) without the channels.
well if the RSN's plan of selling OTT happens. All of the cable systems and direct may drop them unless they are allowd to be sold as add on channels and then dish may add them back.
 
Bruce

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
9,916
11,134
well if the RSN's plan of selling OTT happens. All of the cable systems and direct may drop them unless they are allowd to be sold as add on channels and then dish may add them back.
At the price they plan on charging ( in the $20’s), they are not going to find many takers.

Sports on RSNs do not get good ratings, it gets a dedicated audience and that is why advertisers flock to it.

Even the NFL, the most popular sport in the U.S. was only getting under 20 million for the national games, the biggest sporting event of the year, the Super Bowl received 112.3 million viewers, which is still only a third of the population( 331,893,745), that means over 200 million was not watching it.

We were binge watching season 6 of the Expanse when it was on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
E

edisonprime

SatelliteGuys Pro
Dec 12, 2012
2,868
1,118
55901
Even the NFL, the most popular sport in the U.S. was only getting under 20 million for the national games, the biggest sporting event of the year, the Super Bowl received 112.3 million viewers, which is still only a third of the population( 331,893,745), that means over 200 million was not watching it.
Such as myself. The Super Bowl is WWWWAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYY OVERRATED....
 
Jimbo

Jimbo

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 14, 2005
67,110
5,897
NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
At the price they plan on charging ( in the $20’s), they are not going to find many takers.

Sports on RSNs do not get good ratings, it gets a dedicated audience and that is why advertisers flock to it.

Even the NFL, the most popular sport in the U.S. was only getting under 20 million for the national games, the biggest sporting event of the year, the Super Bowl received 112.3 million viewers, which is still only a third of the population( 331,893,745), that means over 200 million was not watching it.

We were binge watching season 6 of the Expanse when it was on.
Only a third of the population ... streamed it ?
Thats amazing, seeing it was available everywhere else as well ... now if it was on Streaming only, it would have been larger for those that are interested in the SB.

Many people that did not watch the SB didn't have thier team in it, so it wasn't as attractive.
 
chiodo

chiodo

SatelliteGuys Pro
Pub Member / Supporter
Aug 17, 2005
625
377
Pacific NW
Yeah for me I don't give a dam about Sports,. I'm pissed enough that I have to pay for ESPN, that I never watch. So why should I pay extra for RSN if I only watch sports occasionally at most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeD-C05 and edisonprime
S

sam_gordon

SatelliteGuys Pro
May 21, 2009
2,454
1,324
Lexington, ky
Only a third of the population ... streamed it ?
Thats amazing, seeing it was available everywhere else as well ... now if it was on Streaming only, it would have been larger for those that are interested in the SB.

Many people that did not watch the SB didn't have thier team in it, so it wasn't as attractive.
112.3 Million watched the Super Bowl. That included streaming as well as broadcast.
 
Bruce

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
9,916
11,134
Only a third of the population ... streamed it ?
Thats amazing, seeing it was available everywhere else as well ... now if it was on Streaming only, it would have been larger for those that are interested in the SB.

Many people that did not watch the SB didn't have thier team in it, so it wasn't as attractive.
Where did I say that?
 
Jimbo

Jimbo

SatelliteGuys Master
Lifetime Supporter
Jul 14, 2005
67,110
5,897
NW Ohio - Buckeye Country
Where did I say that?
At the price they plan on charging ( in the $20’s), they are not going to find many takers.

Sports on RSNs do not get good ratings, it gets a dedicated audience and that is why advertisers flock to it.

Even the NFL, the most popular sport in the U.S. was only getting under 20 million for the national games, the biggest sporting event of the year, the Super Bowl received 112.3 million viewers, which is still only a third of the population( 331,893,745), that means over 200 million was not watching it.

We were binge watching season 6 of the Expanse when it was on.
 
Foxbat

Foxbat

Addicted to new HW
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 25, 2003
18,771
11,739
Michiana
I think Bruce was wondering where the “streamed it” came from, not the 1/3 part.
 
Bruce

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
9,916
11,134
At the price they plan on charging ( in the $20’s), they are not going to find many takers.

Sports on RSNs do not get good ratings, it gets a dedicated audience and that is why advertisers flock to it.

Even the NFL, the most popular sport in the U.S. was only getting under 20 million for the national games, the biggest sporting event of the year, the Super Bowl received 112.3 million viewers, which is still only a third of the population( 331,893,745), that means over 200 million was not watching it.

We were binge watching season 6 of the Expanse when it was on.
Again, where did I say 70% streamed it?
 
Bruce

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
9,916
11,134
I think Bruce was wondering where the “streamed it” came from, not the 1/3 part.
He knows that, for some reason he is trolling me because of the shift to streaming.
 
Juan

Juan

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 14, 2003
30,211
7,850
Moscow Russia
He knows that, for some reason he is trolling me because of the shift to streaming.
I think he is trying to tell you the vast majority of viewers don't stream..The audience that would be willing to pay premuium prices for sunday ticket is very small. The interest is not main stream..very niche
 
Bruce

Bruce

Bender and Chloe, the real Members of the Year
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 29, 2003
9,916
11,134
I think he is trying to tell you the vast majority of viewers don't stream..The audience that would be willing to pay premuium prices for sunday ticket is very small. The interest is not main stream..very niche

Only 28% of view time is dedicated to traditional TV, 68% go to streaming.

(Source: Forbes)

There could be a number of different reasons for this phenomenon, like more channels to choose from or cheaper prices.However, US adults agree that streaming is more entertaining than traditional cable TV, according to pay-TV subscribers statistics.



 
Juan

Juan

Supporting Founder
Supporting Founder
Sep 14, 2003
30,211
7,850
Moscow Russia

Only 28% of view time is dedicated to traditional TV, 68% go to streaming.

(Source: Forbes)

There could be a number of different reasons for this phenomenon, like more channels to choose from or cheaper prices.However, US adults agree that streaming is more entertaining than traditional cable TV, according to pay-TV subscribers statistics.



Thats not the NFL..most people are interested in their local team on their local station..for at most 1 day a week for maybe 3 hours
 

Similar threads

Dugan5468
Replies
5
Views
937
Bruce
Bruce
HipKat
Replies
7
Views
627
charlesrshell
charlesrshell
Altitudinous
Replies
6
Views
358
Altitudinous
Altitudinous
R
Replies
6
Views
656
charlesrshell
charlesrshell
Radioguy41
Replies
9
Views
2K
NABRIL
N

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 2)

  • Dugan5468
  • Mikes7339

Latest posts

Top