Star Trek: Picard

[long_time_DNC]

Something I picked up on right away:

Spoiler

When they first decoded/filtered the audio signal, I thought to myself "wow, that sounds like the Borg to me"

 

[KAB]

Another good one. Loved the Agnes BS scene. And the subtle references to all the old shows. Well done,

 

[bookworm370]

I just watched the 1st two episodes. A good job pepping it up from the drool that was season 1.
And the side jokes were very nice.

 

[KAB]

I just watched the 1st two episodes. A good job pepping it up from the drool that was season 1.
And the side jokes were very nice.

I believe you mean droll, which I don't agree with. New series require character development and back story. With that out of the way this year, they can jump right into the fire.

 

[primestar31]

I believe you mean droll

Nope, I think he really meant drool... bookworm370

 

[bookworm370]

Nope, I think he really meant drool... bookworm370

Yup!

 

[KAB]

Yup!

I guess mine and your definition of DROOL are very different.

drool - Google Search

www.google.com

 

[bookworm370]

I guess mine and your definition of DROOL are very different.

drool - Google Search

www.google.com

Guess I should have said 'dribble'.... As in Tribble? LOL

 

[dfergie]

Good season so far and I loved last season also, Ready Room also good for episode 2...

Spoiler

cliffhanger, Ready Room clip from next week just draws it out...

 

[Foxbat]

Guess I should have said 'dribble'.... As in Tribble? LOL

Maybe you meant, “drivel”?

Definition of DRIVEL

nonsense; drool… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

 

[MikeD-C05]

I like this show this season. It is combining all the elements of the old Next Gen with Borg and Q and time travel ,which is a Star Trek tradition in their shows and movies.

 

[long_time_DNC]

I agree (so far - there's always time for them to mess it it)! Alternative history, time travel, the Borg...

 

[KAB]

Episode 3 was huge dissapointment, IMO, without spilling spoilers.

 

[dfergie]

I just watched & loved...

 

[N5XZS]

Now if they can add other time travels or present 24th century Earth citys other than SF, LA, NY why not add ABQ, and other citys for added diversity!

 

[harshness]

Now if they can add other time travels or present 24th century Earth citys other than SF, LA, NY why not add ABQ, and other citys for added diversity!

What would be the point of using a location that only a few might hope to recognize? ABQ's skyline is decidedly short on distinctive landmarks.

 

[N5XZS]

Well we got very well known Sandia Crest Mountain there, how hard can you miss that!?

 

[Bruce]

Now if they can add other time travels or present 24th century Earth citys other than SF, LA, NY why not add ABQ, and other citys for added diversity!

Star Trek has been to at least one different City in the Time Travel episodes, ST:E went to Detroit ( which looked nothing like Detroit, I am from there, looked like LA).

 

[harshness]

Well we got very well known Sandia Crest Mountain there, how hard can you miss that!?

I guess you have to live there. Outside of all of the antennas lining the top, it looks like any number of big hills to me. I can tell you where it isn't (Kansas, Nebraska Texas, Florida, etc.), but that's not enough.

Mount Lee, without the famous sign, wouldn't mean anything to those who didn't live on its slopes. With the Hollywood sign, everyone knows that the setting is intended to be Los Angeles.

 

[N5XZS]

ABQ, is miles high city + or - 5,200 feet above sea level.

Sandia Mountain tops out at 10,600 feet above sea level!