Uploaded Graphic Images Look Like Crap 💩

[Foxbat]

Scott,

Did something change in the site software or some parameters get tweaked that impact the graphics uploaded to SatelliteGuys? We used to be able to upload graphic images and they showed up pretty close to what we uploaded, but I noticed in the past week that one of the images that Ilya uploaded in an EV thread displaying a table from a crash avoidance test was unreadable as the smaller text was compressed to the background. And just now, I uploaded this image (attached) to a Tesla thread, and it's compressed to barely legible.

I'm attaching Ilya's image as well so you can see what I'm talking about.

 

[comfortably_numb]

Not sure if this related, but IIRC the forum software was converting all image uploads to .WEBP format, but it looks like it's not doing that anymore?

 

[Scott Greczkowski]

No changes have been made.

There is a software update available that came out last week but I have not applied it yet.

 

[harshness]

I'm attaching Ilya's image as well so you can see what I'm talking about.

Other than the 2 and 3 point typefaces (which may not have been readable at the resolution), I'm not seeing serious compromises in the pictures that you posted.

Perhaps they are an artifact of having to significantly enlarge the pictures to read the text?

 

[Foxbat]

I know that the Forum software will de-res the uploaded image to cap the resolution at 1,080 pixels. That should be "HD", but I think it's also the compression being too aggressive.

This is the post I was trying to interpret. I don't have Twitter so I can't see the original infographic.

https://www.satelliteguys.us/xen/threads/tesla-fsd.395018/post-5011367