When will Directv ADD more HD?

Status
Please reply by conversation.

harshness

SatelliteGuys Master
May 5, 2007
20,389
5,452
Salem, OR
The difference between Charlie and Directv, Directv actually add the channels.
How soon they forget. DIRECTV went for three years and added two HD channels; all the while promising ("up to") 100 channels by some time in 2007.
 

paulman182

SatelliteGuys Pro
Sep 10, 2006
420
18
East Kentucky
How soon they forget. DIRECTV went for three years and added two HD channels; all the while promising ("up to") 100 channels by some time in 2007.

Most of us were not HD viewers during that entire time frame, so we have no complaints.

The HD came along as the channels did, and the subscribers.
 

raoul5788

Studebaker driver
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Supporting Founder
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 28, 2004
33,150
18,477
Cheshire CT
How soon they forget. DIRECTV went for three years and added two HD channels; all the while promising ("up to") 100 channels by some time in 2007.

They added two channels in two years because that's all they could, then they added nearly 100 in 2007. It sounds like "up to" 100 in 2007 to me. Another negative post by Harshness! At least you are consistent.
 

ScoBuck

'Just Chillin'
Supporting Founder
Jul 11, 2006
3,167
0
Long Island, NY
How soon they forget. DIRECTV went for three years and added two HD channels; all the while promising ("up to") 100 channels by some time in 2007.

DirecTV openly admitted in their conference calls that they needed to wait until their new sats went up and that they did not have bandwidth. Not a great situation I guess, but it was what it was - and we knew about when, and why to expect things.

DISH has not been quite as candid in laying out their plans as I see it. In fact, the debate now is really If they have bandwidth (many in fact say they do) and if so, why NO NEW HD for these many months - especially during such a peak period as the 4th quarter (highest TV purchasing time), and when D* was agressively going after it.

And if they don't have the bandwidth to use (my opinion), they have shied away from any statement about it. To me, a major difference for sure in philosophy.
 

vurbano

On Double Secret Probation
Supporting Founder
Apr 1, 2004
23,815
104
Newport News, VA
Because LIN is a bunch of money-hungry a**holes. LIN stands for, "Lousy In Negotiations"
Sorry but that dog dont hunt no more. COX Communications has reached agreements long ago, Verizon FIOS ( a neophyte provider) carries the channels and E* has also reached agreements. D* Excuse time by blaming Lin is over. EVERY TV provider in this DMA has reached agreements EXCEPT DIRECTV. :rolleyes:
 

uncrules

SatelliteGuys Pro
Apr 15, 2005
1,977
0
High Point, NC, USA
Sorry but that dog dont hunt no more. COX Communications has reached agreements long ago, Verizon FIOS ( a neophyte provider) carries the channels and E* has also reached agreements. D* Excuse time by blaming Lin is over. EVERY TV provider in this DMA has reached agreements EXCEPT DIRECTV. :rolleyes:

I don't have any LIN stations in my market so this doesn't affect me, but you're right. If everybody else can come to an agreement with LIN, then D* has no excuse.
 

Ronnie-

Member of the Year
Staff member
HERE TO HELP YOU!
Aug 28, 2007
32,336
13,189
mississippi
Sorry but that dog dont hunt no more. COX Communications has reached agreements long ago, Verizon FIOS ( a neophyte provider) carries the channels and E* has also reached agreements. D* Excuse time by blaming Lin is over. EVERY TV provider in this DMA has reached agreements EXCEPT DIRECTV. :rolleyes:
I think they just like ticking you off:p
 

HD#1

SatelliteGuys Pro
Sep 7, 2007
437
0
Los Angeles
I don't understand why we are even asking the question" When will Directv ADD more HD? We have so much now and will get more when the D11 is up and running. All I really want is for them to change MPEG2 channels to MPEG4.
 

satfrat

SatelliteGuys Guru
Pub Member / Supporter
Cutting Edge
Aug 12, 2005
140
6
Rutland, Vermont
How about ESPNU going HD? There's enough sports news updates now on ESPN & ESPN 2,,,so who needs an ESPN News HD? ESPN should turn their attention to more HD sports coverage and not just in their studio! :hungry:

I have written ESPN saying as much. :up

Cheers,
Robin
 

dgordo

SatelliteGuys Pro
Aug 2, 2004
324
1
Chicago
How about ESPNU going HD? There's enough sports news updates now on ESPN & ESPN 2,,,so who needs an ESPN News HD? ESPN should turn their attention to more HD sports coverage and not just in their studio! :hungry:

I have written ESPN saying as much. :up

Cheers,
Robin


ESPNU goes HD in August.
 

harshness

SatelliteGuys Master
May 5, 2007
20,389
5,452
Salem, OR
They added two channels in two years because that's all they could, then they added nearly 100 in 2007. It sounds like "up to" 100 in 2007 to me. Another negative post by Harshness! At least you are consistent.
I was pointing out that this has often been a game of leap-frog and D* is the one that hopped most recently.

When did 80 something channels of which they proudly list 69 (they still list Golf/Versus twice) become close to 100? Has anyone figured out how they get from 69 named channels to the current count of 92? What packages (outside of a dealer package) would one have to subscribe to to get more than 60 HD "channels"?

I freely admit that everyone exaggerates their HD counts (perhaps none worse than Comcast). At some point, we should be able to figure out how they arrive at their numbers.
 

tds4182

SatelliteGuys Pro
Sep 7, 2003
419
0
Kingwood,Texas
Sorry but that dog dont hunt no more. COX Communications has reached agreements long ago, Verizon FIOS ( a neophyte provider) carries the channels and E* has also reached agreements. D* Excuse time by blaming Lin is over. EVERY TV provider in this DMA has reached agreements EXCEPT DIRECTV. :rolleyes:


The last time I checked E* was still signing up new/returning customers. Why don't you go with them, it won't cost that much to break your contract.:eureka
 
Last edited:

harshness

SatelliteGuys Master
May 5, 2007
20,389
5,452
Salem, OR
And if they don't have the bandwidth to use (my opinion), they have shied away from any statement about it.
I see similar silence on the D* front with regard to the release of the SWM and AR21 solutions as well as some of the less critical promises. The AR21 situation is perhaps the most problematic (unless you're a hardcore D* apologist).

Differing philosophies are common between businesses. If two companies substantially shared the same ideals, they probably wouldn't be separate businesses.

At the end of the day, they are different companies who serve their customers the best way they can (and hold on tight to their customer's programming commitments).
 

ScoBuck

'Just Chillin'
Supporting Founder
Jul 11, 2006
3,167
0
Long Island, NY
I see similar silence on the D* front with regard to the release of the SWM and AR21 solutions as well as some of the less critical promises. The AR21 situation is perhaps the most problematic (unless you're a hardcore D* apologist).

I just don't think these issues are anywhere near the forefront as HD is right now. But I agree, that as with all large companies, some things go smoother than others, some never come to fruition.

BTW, you mention Comcast as the worst with HD counts, I say its DISH. They say they have 76 national channels, they in fact have only 42 I believe.
 

steve615

SatelliteGuys Pro
Pub Member / Supporter
Jan 6, 2006
991
83
TN
Will the launch be broadcast on any channel? I missed the D10 launch and had to watch it online. It would kinda neat to see it.

Monday,March 17,2008
The DirecTV Satellite Launch
Channel 573
5:30-7:30PM CDT in our time zone. :)
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

Can we get into MLBEI mode allready!

FSN HD Houston - Tonight

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)