NHL 2013 Stanley Cup Playoffs
- Thread starter BillD1984
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 1K
- Views 91K
-
ENJOY SATELLITEGUYS AD FREE THIS FEBRUARY!
Thank you to the very generous support we got from our members in December we have decided to make the month of February AD FREE for everyone!
We want to see the true speed of our site and enjoy SatelliteGuys the way it was meant to be enjoyed!
If you would like to help us keep the lights on and keep enjoying the site AD FREE consider becoming a PUB MEMBER by CLICKING HERE.
THANK YOU TO EVERYONE FOR YOUR SUPPORT!
Why do the announcers usually refer to a player by his last name, but almost always say "Sidney Crosby." I didn't realize there were other Crosbys in that game.
"Sidney Crosby" makes a lot of behind the back passes; when one out of five connects, we hear "What a phenomenal pass from Sidney Crosby!"
"Sidney Crosby" makes a lot of behind the back passes; when one out of five connects, we hear "What a phenomenal pass from Sidney Crosby!"
Yep, Pens deserved to win last night...but they didn't. I hear Susan Boyle arrived at Boston-Logan airport earlier this morning and is getting ready to sing.
Just in...Mike Richards will be out of his 3rd consecutive game tonight at Staples. Maybe with Keith out due to suspension that will give the Kings a bit of an upper hand. GO KINGS, GO!
Yup, the team that had a player break his leg and continue to play for 45 seconds to kill a penalty "deserved" to lose. The team whose goalie stood on his head for 4 hours and saved 55 shots "deserved" to lose.
I've never seen a series viewed so blatantly one-sided in my life! The first two games, the Penguins didn't try, the Penguins didn't show up. They lose 3-0 and 6-1, but it has nothing to do with their opponent being better. NOW they play a very good, valiant game last night but don't "deserve" to lose. So the Bruins "deserved" to lose?
Give me a f#c^i$ break with this crap!
Enjoy what you are able to watch.
Yup, the team that had a player break his leg and continue to play for 45 seconds to kill a penalty "deserved" to lose. The team whose goalie stood on his head for 4 hours and saved 55 shots "deserved" to lose.
I've never seen a series viewed so blatantly one-sided in my life! The first two games, the Penguins didn't try, the Penguins didn't show up. They lose 3-0 and 6-1, but it has nothing to do with their opponent being better. NOW they play a very good, valiant game last night but don't "deserve" to lose. So the Bruins "deserved" to lose?
Give me a f#c^i$ break with this crap!
STEADY, BIG FELLA!!! You have a LONG way ahead of you by the looks of things. Don't go blowing a gasket just yet. Who knows...you may have ME to deal with head-to-head next weekend.
If the Kings win they're right back in it. If they lose it's all but over. Should be a good game.
Hawks score, tied at 1-1.
From an observer with nothing on the line in this one, Mr. Bickell for the Hawks is having one hellofa playoff ...
Fwiw, I think he's free agent after the playoffs are over.
From an observer with nothing on the line in this one, Mr. Bickell for the Hawks is having one hellofa playoff ...
Fwiw, I think he's free agent after the playoffs are over.
Similar threads
