Social Feed

IcEWoLF
Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Discuss..
I've just saw this @ endgaget today: TiVo and DISH / Echostar head back to Texas for another patent duel - Engadget

Looks like this will never end...it will be bad if dish loses again, it will just hurt customers.
81 Replies · 9980 views
Thomas22
There was an earlier settlement, and RIM had already put $450M in an escrow, they only had to pay another $162M as a result of chickened out at the judge's injunction threat.
There was no earlier settlement. Rim thought there was. They were wrong.

RIM just can't catch a break. Following ruling after ruling against the Blackberry manufacturer, a federal judge has now decided that the disputed $450 million settlement with NTP that RIM was looking to have enforced is not in fact valid. District Judge James Spencer could next decide to reissue an injunction that would suspend Blackberry service in the US, which might effectively force RIM to cough up as much as $1 billion to avoid. All of this action comes while the validity of NTP's original patents is still in question, but that is still an issue for the Patent Office and thus has no bearing on the current proceedings.
J
There was no earlier settlement. Rim thought there was. They were wrong.

RIM already agreed to pay and in fact had already practically paid $450M a year earlier by putting that money in the escrow, the judge wasn't satisfied, and made a threat, and RIM agreed to pay another $162M as a result of such threat.

Happy now?

BTW, there was also this "wild claim" that it could have cost RIM as much as $1 billion if RIM did not settle, was this how some of the TiVo folks came up with the $500M E* would have to pay if they did not settle?

You think Charlie is shaking in his boots?

TiVo did not even make a real effort to prove E*'s new design continues to infringe. Keep in mind for TiVo as the "mover" in this contempt proceeding to actually prove a contempt, TiVo must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the new design is still an infringement. The burden of proof in this situation is actually higher than during the jury trial.

TiVo isn't even trying this time around, do you know why? They can't, E* made those changes and TiVo themselves cannot deny such changes.

All TiVo has been able to do is to say, but E* violated the injunction "on the face", or E*'s new design still "parses"

"On the face" or "on the parse", my arse:)
Thomas22
RIM already agreed to pay and in fact had already practically paid $450M a year earlier by putting that money in the escrow, the judge wasn't satisfied, and made a threat, and RIM agreed to pay another $162M as a result of such threat.
The problem was that there was no agreement. The talks broke down. Rim never gave any money to NTP because there never was an agreement. Judge Spencer agreed that there never was an agreement. Rim had to start over and try to work out an agreement. NTP had no claim to a single centavo of settlement money until the settlement was reached. The settlement amount was $612.5 million and every penny was given to NTP on 3-3-06.
J
The problem was that there was no agreement. The talks broke down. Rim never gave any money to NTP because there never was an agreement. Judge Spencer agreed that there never was an agreement. Rim had to start over and try to work out an agreement. NTP had no claim to a single centavo of settlement money until the settlement was reached. The settlement amount was $612.5 million and every penny was given to NTP on 3-3-06.

And applying RIM case to this case how? Why avoid the real issues here? TiVo has no case on the contempt issue, that is why after 11 months into the contempt proceeding, they still got nothing.

DISH's record so far in this has been awesome. 0 wins at all stages. No reason to believe they will not lose again.

E* only lost to TiVo once, that was three years ago, right after that loss, E*, D* and TW were sued by Forgent for a similar DVR patent infringement, as I said earlier, D* and TW chickened out at the last minute and settled with Forgent for $8M and $20M each, only to find out a few weeks later E* had thrown Forgent out on the curb, that was right after E* lost to TiVo back then, and Charlie relied on the same lawyers to win that Forgent case for him, talk about having the faith and guts.

Since then E* managed to delay the case by appealing, and TiVo did not get to see that money for three years until late last year.

DISH's record so far in this has been awesome. 0 wins at all stages. No reason to believe they will not lose again.

TiVo lost to E* in this case once too, they lost on the treble and attorney fee argument, the judge denied TiVo's request to be paid treble and attorney fees.

E* not only managed to delay the payment to TiVo for three years, they also managed to have the appeals court to stay the injunction for nearly two years too, during which time E* was able to design around the TiVo's patent without disabling any of their DVRs.

Most importantly TiVo has yet since gotten one extra penny from E*, the record is there for you to see, if only you are willing to see it.
C
And applying RIM case to this case how? Why avoid the real issues here? TiVo has no case on the contempt issue, that is why after 11 months into the contempt proceeding, they still got nothing.



E* only lost to TiVo once, that was three years ago, right after that loss, E*, D* and TW were sued by Forgent for a similar DVR patent infringement, as I said earlier, D* and TW chickened out at the last minute and settled with Forgent for $8M and $20M each, only to find out a few weeks later E* had thrown Forgent out on the curb, that was right after E* lost to TiVo back then, and Charlie relied on the same lawyers to win that Forgent case for him, talk about having the faith and guts.

Since then E* managed to delay the case by appealing, and TiVo did not get to see that money for three years until late last year.



TiVo lost to E* in this case once too, they lost on the treble and attorney fee argument, the judge denied TiVo's request to be paid treble and attorney fees.

E* not only managed to delay the payment to TiVo for three years, they also managed to have the appeals court to stay the injunction for nearly two years too, during which time E* was able to design around the TiVo's patent without disabling any of their DVRs.

Most importantly TiVo has yet since gotten one extra penny from E*, the record is there for you to see, if only you are willing to see it.

LOST the case.
LOST the Appeal
LOST the appeal to the Supreme Court.

that's 0 for 3
vampz26
LOST the case.
LOST the Appeal
LOST the appeal to the Supreme Court.

that's 0 for 3

Here...reading material...

Rope-a-dope - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia...

I've said it before, I'll say it again....E* is less interested in winning as they are in litigating this nonsense into oblivion thus winning by default...
mike123abc
Here...reading material...

Rope-a-dope - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia...

I've said it before, I'll say it again....E* is less interested in winning as they are in litigating this nonsense into oblivion thus winning by default...

Dish's strategy is probably to try to litigate this until the patents expire or TiVo agrees to a one time licensing fee... There is no incentive for Dish to ever give in to TiVo after it has gone this far. May as well keep appealing and dragging it out as long as possible.
vampz26
Dish's strategy is probably to try to litigate this until the patents expire or TiVo agrees to a one time licensing fee... There is no incentive for Dish to ever give in to TiVo after it has gone this far. May as well keep appealing and dragging it out as long as possible.

HFS....You know, I've been preaching this rhetoric in every forum, on every site ad naseum since the whole trial BS began...I've been flamed, banned, ignored, threatened, stalked, ridiculed, and who knows what else...

...but you are the first person who in some way, shape or form who ever agreed with me on it. :eek:

I need to get some sleep...
L
E* needs to get (1) either get a ruling that its DVRs no longer infringe or (2) litigate with Tivo to the point where Charlie can buy it. Either way, Charlie gets to market his hardware to other segments of the industry.
riffjim4069
I was thinking...instead of a licensing agreement, I wonder if E* and Tivo will enter into a partnership? EchoStar could make the hardware and Tivo could brand and market this digital cable ready version of the EchoStar's 922. This would be a killer machine if they could merge all the Tivo HD, VIP Series and Sling features into one box. Additionally, there could be two version of this 922/Series X box: a cable tuner only model for Cable MSO sales, and a two cable tuner/two OTA tuner model for the direct-to-consumer sales. Having been a E* customer for almost three years and after having used a Tivo HD with FiOS TV the past couple months, I would love to see this happen.

I don't know about you, but this sould like a win-win-win situation that could actually help Dish Network add and retain customers.
whatchel1
Unlikely

I was thinking...instead of a licensing agreement, I wonder if E* and Tivo will enter into a partnership? EchoStar could make the hardware and Tivo could brand and market this digital cable ready version of the EchoStar's 922. This would be a killer machine if they could merge all the Tivo HD, VIP Series and Sling features into one box. Additionally, there could be two version of this 922/Series X box: a cable tuner only model for Cable MSO sales, and a two cable tuner/two OTA tuner model for the direct-to-consumer sales. Having been a E* customer for almost three years and after having used a Tivo HD with FiOS TV the past couple months, I would love to see this happen.

I don't know about you, but this sould like a win-win-win situation that could actually help Dish Network add and retain customers.

Cable systems and sat systems use entirely different technolgies. It is highly unlikely to be able to combine all these you you want. They just are not compatible. It would be totally different guts for both machines. You area also bringing in a 3rd totally different technology when you ask about FIOS as well. so you are looking a 3 different boxes here.
riffjim4069
Cable systems and sat systems use entirely different technolgies. It is highly unlikely to be able to combine all these you you want. They just are not compatible. It would be totally different guts for both machines. You area also bringing in a 3rd totally different technology when you ask about FIOS as well. so you are looking a 3 different boxes here.
You do realize that EchoStar currently makes Cable products (Sling Modem), licenses Tru2Way cable technology, has been trying to reach set-top-box agreements with Cable MSOs for almost a year, and have announced they will be making a "Cable" version of the 922 available to the Cable community this spring? EchoStar is wanting to get into the Cable set-top-box market and a partnership with Tivo may be the "only way" they will get there. Anyway, I've provided links for your reading pleasure.

http://www.echostar.com/downloads/pdf/news/press_releases/Echostar_tru2way_PR.pdf
http://www.echostar.com/downloads/pdf/news/press_releases/BestofCESJan09.pdf
http://www.echostar.com/downloads/pdf/news/press_releases/Echostar_tru2way_PR.pdf
http://www.echostar.com/downloads/p...s/EchoStar-SlingModem Press Release FINAL.pdf
J
HFS....You know, I've been preaching this rhetoric in every forum, on every site ad naseum since the whole trial BS began...I've been flamed, banned, ignored, threatened, stalked, ridiculed, and who knows what else...

...but you are the first person who in some way, shape or form who ever agreed with me on it. :eek:

I need to get some sleep...

No one ever flamed you for saying E* might want to delay all they can.

Now your notion that the judge had the hidden agenda of the "new world order" was another story:)
J
E* needs to get (1) either get a ruling that its DVRs no longer infringe or (2) litigate with Tivo to the point where Charlie can buy it. Either way, Charlie gets to market his hardware to other segments of the industry.

In the legal context, E* does not have to do anything, as long as the judge does not order E* to turn off the DVR functions. Everything else is hot air.
C
I was thinking...instead of a licensing agreement, I wonder if E* and Tivo will enter into a partnership? EchoStar could make the hardware and Tivo could brand and market this digital cable ready version of the EchoStar's 922. This would be a killer machine if they could merge all the Tivo HD, VIP Series and Sling features into one box. Additionally, there could be two version of this 922/Series X box: a cable tuner only model for Cable MSO sales, and a two cable tuner/two OTA tuner model for the direct-to-consumer sales. Having been a E* customer for almost three years and after having used a Tivo HD with FiOS TV the past couple months, I would love to see this happen.

I don't know about you, but this sould like a win-win-win situation that could actually help Dish Network add and retain customers.

That is the scenario I am rooting for.

One exchange from the recent hearing that is in the minutes shows the judge urging the parties to settle. The TiVo attorney replied that they were open to it, Ergen only replied with a maybe. So I think Vampz26 assessment of Dish's mindset is currently closest to the mark. Settlement does not seem to be on Dish's current agenda.

Technically, the box for cable needs to have cable tuners which differ from satellite tuners. The rest could be very similar and the user interface would probably be almost identical. That box could be the basis for cable and FIOS products, since they both work the same.

The battle is counter productive for all, let's hope it ends well.
1
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
I just heard about this Dish Anywhere. I have a Hopper in the living room, a Joey in the basement, and antenna tv in the bed room. As I understand it I can get rid of my Joey I could save a few bucks but that tv and the bedroom tv are not smart tv's. How would I handle that? If with a Firestick what remote would I use or would I have to use 2 of them? I have good internet with starlink so wifi wouldn't be a problem. If someone could guide me to a link that a old man could understand I would appreciate it.
29 Replies · 732 views
tornado
Rambling about picture quality.

Satellite channels with the Joey 4 look better on the old 65 LG oled than with the Hopper 3 on the newer Sony 77 oled.

I don't have a Hopper Plus.

Maybe the satellite picture quality with the Hopper Plus would be better than the Hopper 3 satellite box?

Trying streaming from Dish Anywhere app to see if the stream is better than sat.

Picture using Dish Anywhere on my latest Apple TV 4K box on the channel I'm watching started out alternating between fuzzy and clear.

The picture stabilized after a few minutes.

I have an old Apple TV HD connected to and big older TV.

I had to remove Dish Anywhere application and reinstall it to get it working on the old TV with the Apple TV HD.

I hooked up a Google box to a non oled 43 inch LG 4K set.

The Google box Dish Anywhere combination looks and works great.

Wonder what the picture quality will be with a wireless Joey 4 for the satellite chanels?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
jsmit86
Rambling about picture quality.

Satellite channels with the Joey 4 look better on the old 65 LG oled than with the Hopper 3 on the newer Sony 77 oled.

I don't have a Hopper Plus.

Maybe the satellite picture quality with the Hopper Plus would be better than the Hopper 3 satellite box?

Trying streaming from Dish Anywhere app to see if the stream is better than sat.

Picture using Dish Anywhere on my latest Apple TV 4K box on the channel I'm watching started out alternating between fuzzy and clear.

The picture stabilized after a few minutes.

I have an old Apple TV HD connected to and big older TV.

I had to remove Dish Anywhere application and reinstall it to get it working on the old TV with the Apple TV HD.

I hooked up a Google box to a non oled 43 inch LG 4K set.

The Google box Dish Anywhere combination looks and works great.

Wonder what the picture quality will be with a wireless Joey 4 for the satellite chanels?
The Hopper3 outputs 1080i unless the content requires 1080P or 2160P (4K)
The Plus and the Joey4s upscale all content to 2160P, and also flag the content as HDR regardless of the actual color profile. How the TV will handle that depends on the HDMI setting.

So, it's possible that the difference you are seeing is related to the upscaling performance, or the possible HDR settings on your TV.
tornado
The Hopper3 outputs 1080i unless the content requires 1080P or 2160P (4K)
The Plus and the Joey4s upscale all content to 2160P, and also flag the content as HDR regardless of the actual color profile. How the TV will handle that depends on the HDMI setting.

So, it's possible that the difference you are seeing is related to the upscaling performance, or the possible HDR settings on your TV.
This information makes me want to try a Plus or Joey4 on my newer 77 Sony oled to see if the picture is better.

I wonder if the Wireless Joey 4 will output to my 32 inch QHD (2K) computer monitor?

I once hooked up an Apple TV box to my computer monitor and it worked I think.

I don't know what resolution the Apple TV was sending to the computer monitor.

I'm very pleased with the picture from the Joey4 on my TV.

The satellite channels picture quality from the Hopper 3 on my newer 77 Sony oled could be better.

Perhaps the satellite channels being output 1080i?

Maybe it is the large screen size?

I am not sure why the picture seems a little less good from the Hopper 3 on my newer 77 Sony oled?

I have tried the Joey4 on an older 43 inch 4K LG non oled that doesn't do HDR.

Joey4 is great!!!

Can't wait to get the Wireless Joey 4.

Maybe a Plus or Joey4 newer would look better on my 77 inch TV?

Thank you for your help.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
A
This information makes me want to try a Plus or Joey4 on my newer 77 Sony oled to see if the picture is better.

I wonder if the Wireless Joey 4 will output to my 32 inch QHD (2K) computer monitor?

I once hooked up an Apple TV box to my computer monitor and it worked I think.

I don't know what resolution the Apple TV was sending to the computer monitor.

I'm very pleased with the picture from the Joey4 on my TV.

The satellite channels picture quality from the Hopper 3 on my newer 77 Sony oled could be better.

Perhaps the satellite channels being output 1080i?

Maybe it is the large screen size?

I am not sure why the picture seems a little less good from the Hopper 3 on my newer 77 Sony oled?

I have tried the Joey4 on an older 43 inch 4K LG non oled that doesn't do HDR.

Joey4 is great!!!

Can't wait to get the Wireless Joey 4.

Maybe a Plus or Joey4 newer would look better on my 77 inch TV?

Thank you for your help.
we have a 77 inch oled sony our hopper 3 looks amazing on it!! as good as direct would and for the standard def channels it upscales awesome. i wonder if it's something in the tv settings or something going on with the hopper.. 🤔 we have an LG oled tv in the truck with an apple tv and it looks great to using dish anywhere. the joey 4's are an awesome client!!!
Almighty1
we have a 77 inch oled sony our hopper 3 looks amazing on it!! as good as direct would and for the standard def channels it upscales awesome. i wonder if it's something in the tv settings or something going on with the hopper.. 🤔 we have an LG oled tv in the truck with an apple tv and it looks great to using dish anywhere. the joey 4's are an awesome client!!!
Sony uses LG OLED Display panels but the electronics makes the difference in the processing of the signal.

As for Dish Anywhere, your speed is the full WiFi/Ethernet speed at home so it's giving maximum bandwidth available and should still be good on the iPhone when at home. When you are using an external connection, it is limited by the upload speeds of your internet connection depending what you have. For me, I have 1.4Gbps download but 42Mbps upload and of course DISH Anywhere does not use the full 42Mbps either.
tornado
Sony uses LG OLED Display panels but the electronics makes the difference in the processing of the signal.

As for Dish Anywhere, your speed is the full WiFi/Ethernet speed at home so it's giving maximum bandwidth available and should still be good on the iPhone when at home. When you are using an external connection, it is limited by the upload speeds of your internet connection depending what you have. For me, I have 1.4Gbps download but 42Mbps upload and of course DISH Anywhere does not use the full 42Mbps either.
About the Sony. This is correct.

Models change and companies change every year sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse, but Sony has generally been good.

I think there was a Sony oled one year that used a Samsung panel and may have been great.

I think TCL is going to start making stuff for Sony.

I just ordered a Hopper Plus but I will be hesitant to use it because of the greater complexity having to have one more thing plugged into my Hopper 3.

I don't know how the Hopper Plus will affect the picture quality.

With the Hopper Plus plugged into the Hopper 3 it will be every hole filled.

I don't know which one of the three USB ports I should plug the Hopper Plus into?

On the bright side with the Hopper Plus I should be able to view and control Google Home on my big screen.

For Dish Anywhere I am sure network/internet connection is important.
Bobby
About the Sony. This is correct.

Models change and companies change every year sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse.

I think there was a Sony oled one year that used a Samsung panel and may have been great.

I think TCL is going to start making stuff for Sony.

I just ordered a Hopper Plus but I will be hesitant to use it because of the greater complexity having to have one more thing plugged into my Hopper 3.

I don't know how it will effect the picture quality.

With the Hopper Plus plugged into the Hopper 3 it will be every hole filled.

I don't know Which one of the three USB ports I should plug the Hopper Plus into?

On the bright side with the Hopper Plus I should be able to view and control Google Home on my big screen.

For Dish Anywhere I am sure network/internet connection is important.
You can get a USB Hub and plug it into one of the rear USB ports and expand on your inputs without using the USB port on the front of your Hopper 3.
tornado
You can get a USB Hub and plug it into one of the rear USB ports and expand on your inputs without using the USB port on the front of your Hopper 3.
That's an idea.
A
Sony uses LG OLED Display panels but the electronics makes the difference in the processing of the signal.

As for Dish Anywhere, your speed is the full WiFi/Ethernet speed at home so it's giving maximum bandwidth available and should still be good on the iPhone when at home. When you are using an external connection, it is limited by the upload speeds of your internet connection depending what you have. For me, I have 1.4Gbps download but 42Mbps upload and of course DISH Anywhere does not use the full 42Mbps either.
sony does use LG panels is correct. and the electronics do make a difference in the processing of the signal wich is also true. though sony also cherry picks the panels to.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
navychop
I recommend the USB hub be self powered. Gives you options to add unpowered EHDs without concern about stressing your internal power supply.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in Movie Talk
2 Replies · 15 views
KAB
KAB
Weird.
meStevo

mood GIF
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
67461 Replies · 2664005 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
gms49ers
Mack the Knife - Bobby Darin
EatMyVolts
Bobby Sox to Stockings -- Frankie Avalon
sdfntx
No Bobby No - The Honeys
  • Love
Reactions: Bobby
long_time_DNC
I Fought The Law - The Bobby Fuller Four
H
Breaking The LAW-Judas Priest
Gary Toma
Staff member Pub Member / Supporter Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV Technical Resources Forum
The TPN Map Excel Presents all DIRECTV Channels:
National (50-States or wide/NAT+PR beams)
Local (Local-Into-Local or narrow/Spot beams)
Additional tabs provide:​
OTA the (Over-The-Air) Database
VOD (Video On_Demand) Records
Offline Records
Engr Records
Net Decoder a graphic presentation of all satellites and transponders
Domestic Satellites
@99W...... D11, D14
@101W.... D9S, D16
@103W.... D10, D12, D15
@110W.... D5
@119W.... D8​



See also

Understanding the TPN Map

Making Sense of the TPN Map Display Conventions
2002 Replies · 915398 views
D
Someone posted this over@avsforums re: are the FanDuel RSN's actually ever shutting down...which might explain why they're still on DirecTV:

  • Like
Reactions: mario315
D
DirecTV Satellite Transponder Updates for Jul 15 2026

Comparison of Transponder Data for Jul 15 2026 vs Jul 08 2026:


No changes in system tables for any transponder tuning parameters.

Stream (PID) counts:

LIVE Streams​
National​
Spot Beams​
Count​
Change​
Count​
Change​
4K​
4​
HD​
269​
-6​
1447​
50​
SD mpeg4
142​
-2​
194​
6​
SD mpeg2
443​
2​
RB​
Audio​
89​
Push​
26​
Slate​
19​
1​
TEST Streams​
National​
Spot Beams​
Count​
Change​
Count​
Change​
4K​
HD​
1​
SD mpeg4
SD mpeg2
RB​
Engr Work​
49​
7​


The PID count Excel workbook provides much more count detail.

Newly updated tables of Streams on each transponder are available in the DataDigesters TPN Grids

More details of changes in individual channels will follow in the Weekly Analysis
and Gary Toma's Domestic TPN Map Excel files
The Open Golf channels active
Another round of LIL reshuffles
Weekly Analysis soon
Enjoy
DataDigesters
  • Like
Reactions: lordodogg
D
Weekly Analysis for 7/15/2026:
  • Like
Reactions: lordodogg
K
COOL/2 was added to some more markets, and removed from Orlando where it was added last week even though it conflicted with WESH/2

Scripps returns

Open prep

Some TPN swaps
K
The Atlanta Hawks will be on WANF/46 and simulcasted on Gray's Peachtree Sports Network subchannels in Albany, Augusta, Columbus, Macon and Savannah
https://www.nba.com/hawks/news/atlanta-news-first-to-become-atlanta-hawks-first-for-july16
teachsac
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in TV Shows
My mom always had this on back in the 70's. Watched the first episode today. Was pretty good.
2 Replies · 25 views
NYDutch
Once I got past the new actors playing familiar characters, I found the series good, but a bit dark compared to the original.
teachsac
Once I got past the new actors playing familiar characters, I found the series good, but a bit dark compared to the original.
I'm on episode 3. I like the cast. I had my doubts, too, but liking it. I like Laura. Not really find of Mary.
comfortably_numb
Pub Member / Supporter
Last reply · posted in Over the Air Television By RabbitEars.Info
I'm still experimenting with OTA antennas at my new apartment. The mudflap works OK, but we had a dust/wind/rain storm the other day and it all but blew it away. I moved it indoors where the antenna is safer but the signals are marginal.

I bought a traditional Yagi antenna from Amazon and it seems to work more consistently, plus it's meant for outdoors where the mudflap is not.

Anyway, I've had success using umbrella bases paired with a fence post for satellite dishes, and I figured that could work for this as well. I'm just not sure where or what to get and what size pole for this application.

IMG_0033.webp
IMG_0034.webp
49 Replies · 978 views
navychop
It really looks like exercise gear.
Jimbo
It really looks like exercise gear.
Well, there ya go ... if it doesn't work out for the TV ...

Then again, most don't use thier exercise stuff after the first few weeks.
primestar31
Then again, most don't use thier exercise stuff after the first few weeks.
Yes they do, where else would you hang your clothes? LOL
Jimbo
Yes they do, where else would you hang your clothes? LOL
Well, They go on your Treadmill ... :)
  • Haha
Reactions: Foxbat
comfortably_numb
Extension arrived today and installed. Greatly improved my signal strength/quality. Thanks primestar31

IMG_0138.webp
IMG_0137.webp
IMG_0138.webp
IMG_0137.webp
IMG_0141.webp
IMG_0140.webp
SuperDish_Fan23
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
These are my opinions, so dont kill me LOL
my-image 2.webp
49 Replies · 850 views
Scott Greczkowski
My favorite receiver besides the amazing Hopper 3 was the DishPlayer 7200. I loved that thing as buggy as it was. It was the future!
MikeD-C05
My favorite receiver besides the amazing Hopper 3 was the DishPlayer 7200. I loved that thing as buggy as it was. It was the future!
I had both the 7100 and 7200 dishplayer starting in 1999. My first exposure to the internet at my house using the WebTV feature. We loved it till they had a fight between Microsoft and DISH and then I can't remember how many of those damn boxes I ended up replacing till I just gave up and went with a regular receiver again and used it with my VCR.

But then the 501 PVR came out and the 510 and the 522 standard def receiver but it still didn't have name-based recording. Then the 942 receivers were even better with built in ota tuner and name- based recording. Had two of those in 2005. But only 250GB hard drive for like 25 hours of HD recording, but it did have dual room use, like the 722k that came later did.
T
I had both the 7100 and 7200 dishplayer starting in 1999. My first exposure to the internet at my house using the WebTV feature. We loved it till they had a fight between Microsoft and DISH and then I can't remember how many of those damn boxes I ended up replacing till I just gave up and went with a regular receiver again and used it with my VCR.

But then the 501 PVR came out and the 510 and the 522 standard def receiver but it still didn't have name-based recording. Then the 942 receivers were even better with built in ota tuner and name- based recording. Had two of those in 2005. But only 250GB hard drive for like 25 hours of HD recording, but it did have dual room use, like the 722k that came later did.
Didn't they add the NBR at some point to the 50x series? I stayed away from dishplayer and my instincts were right.
Before the 3000, 4000 and 5000 there was the 2000. It came in two versions, one IR and the deluxe model was UHF. Looked just like the later receivers. The 4000 was a huge piece of junk, it suffered from random dropouts they never fixed. I think Charlie admitted to it being due to the chipset in one of the chats.
All I ever saw or heard about were the 3000 and 4000, which came out at launch in 1996. They actually had 2 lines of them, Echostar branded and HTS (remember that?) branded. Same model #s, though. Neither of them were particularly problematic to my observation. I never saw such described issues with the 4000. It was my main go-to because I liked to offer remote room use.

So this 2000, was it some kind of pre-launch receiver, like a demonstrator? Having the option of either UHF or IR under the same model # seems odd. Is there a pic of this box anywhere?

One also needs to remember that in the same timeframe DTV (through its partnering mfr's) didn't offer radio remote. DiSH was different in taking its manufacturing in-house, but of course that was its previous Echosphere/Echostar c-band model, since its purchase of HTS. And probably most of the c-band systems they sold were UHF remote.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
dishdude
So this 2000, was it some kind of pre-launch receiver, like a demonstrator? Having the option of either UHF or IR under the same model # seems odd. Is there a pic of this box anywhere?

It looked identical to the 3000 and some were labeled 2200. No IR blaster for the VCR, I can't remember if the 3000 had one or not, the 4000 certainly did.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Jim5506
Pictures are so small I can't tell which is which, except for the two that are named.
T
It looked identical to the 3000 and some were labeled 2200. No IR blaster for the VCR, I can't remember if the 3000 had one or not, the 4000 certainly did.
That may have been reserved to the 5000, if it was available in the early models at all. It was not a 4000 feature as far as I remember. I really first recall it with 4700 (and not 3700).
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
TWiT Tech Podcast Network
· posted in TWiT Tech Podcast Network
0 Replies · 2 views