Social Feed

W
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Currently I have a 612,a 722, and 211K receivers. I have the 722 in the basement where all the sat antenna (3 coaxes) and OTA antennas enter the house. The 722 is connected one of the sat antenna coaxes, the internet and a sling box, and the SD output is connected to a video distribution system which also has OTA antenna input. This allow me to watch SD Dish and/or OTA at all the wired coax outlets in the house.

In addition, I have a 612 in the living room, fed with a cable that is diplex/triplex with one sat antenna (supplying two tuners in the 612) and OTA antenna from the basement. This cable is then diplex/triplex to the two tuners in the 612 and the OTA signal which is split between a Tivo box and the OTA input to the 612. This give me 2 dish sat channels plus one OTA recording on the 612 plus 2 channels OTA recording on the Tivo, just in the living room.

I have the 211K receiver in my bedroom, fed with one coax from the basement. That cable has the sat antenna diplex/triplex with the video distribution (which is actually rf, not video) rf output of the 722 mixed with OTA signals. This allows me to view the output of the 722 in SD, OTA and also input to the 211K. I did this so I can watch recorded shows from the 722, OTA shows, and HD live sat on the 211K. I also use the 211K in my RV.

Now I'd like to replace all this (possibly not the 211K since I'll still need it in the RV) with a Hopper/Joey system. I think I'd need to put the Hopper in the basement, since it will need two coax inputs from the sat antenna for the 4-tuner recording/watching. But, I don't believe that the Hopper has OTA recording or even an input, so I'll to supply OTA, and Hopper output to a Joey and Tivo in the Living Room which only has one coax cable. All coax cables are installed inside walls/ceiling and installing new ones (professionally inside wall/ceilings) would be a nightmare, cutting drywall in multiple locations, upstairs and downstairs). I've read that you can have the moca signals between the Hopper/joey and OTA signals on the same coax. So, it seems that the only solution for that location would be a wireless Joey, and use the coax for OTA only.

I believe that I'd have to do the same (wifi Joey) in my bedroom.

I would leave the rest of the TVs on rf input, assuming there is an rf output from the hopper, which will be SD only. I'm finding I'm not using those TV as much anyway.

I believe that the wireless Joey has less functionality, and certainly doesn't have any recording capability, so I'll loose at least one record tuner capability.

Does this sound like it would work? Is there a better solution without tearing out walls and ceilings to route coax cables? Routing cables along the outside of the house or around baseboards is NOT an option.
32 Replies · 9925 views
B
You can think of the node like a splitter. It can be placed anywhere between the Sat Dish and the Hopper(s). A solo node can support ONE Hopper and several Joeys. A dual node can support two Hoppers and multiple Joeys. A solo node requires two coax cables from the Dish and a dual node requires 3 coax cables from the dish. Only one coax is needed from the node to each Hopper or Joey location. You can ad a tap (splitter) if you need more locations then the node can connect directly. A super Joey has some special wiring requirements, that are above my pay grade.
A Perfect system for a couple, who are TV junkies is two Hoppers with Sling and enough Joeys (at $7/month each) to support all your remaining TVs, Plus an OTA adapter on each Hopper. This would allow eight independent tuners, one of which can magically record the four major networks. then 8 TVs ( or 11 if 4 are watching the networks) can independently watch what they want live or any recordings on the Hoppers.
If the Hopper is recording it consumes one tuner for the four network channels and one tuner for each additional channel. The OTA tuner can only tune ONE channel at a time to watch or record.
Since I am getting as long winded as you, I will let you digest this and respond with more questions as you sort through the maze.
harshness
You can think of the node like a splitter.
No, you cannot. It is nothing like a splitter. If you play fast and loose with the terminology, it could be thought of as a special kind of combiner.

It is a stacker that puts enough bands on a single cable to feed three tuners.
W
Ok, then a "node" is a piece of hardware, independent of the existing dish antenna, and the hopper/joeys?

No, you cannot. It is nothing like a splitter. If you play fast and loose with the terminology, it could be thought of as a special kind of combiner.

It is a stacker that puts enough bands on a single cable to feed three tuners.
harshness
Ok, then a "node" is a piece of hardware, independent of the existing dish antenna, and the hopper/joeys?
Sure, you could say that, but so is a remote control.
W
Sure, you could say that, but so is a remote control.
My point is that this "Node" does not exist within the Hopper, it is additional hardware to the hopper/joey boxes/Dish 1000 antenna.
C
My point is that this "Node" does not exist within the Hopper, it is additional hardware to the hopper/joey boxes/Dish 1000 antenna.
That is correct. Without getting pedantic, the node acts as a router for your Hopper/Joey system. As others have said, it is installed between the Dish and the hopper. Single hopper systems use a Solo node, 2 hopper setups use a Duo node. The node is what separates the signals into specific bandwidths to carry carry multiple streams on a single cable. The system has to have a node even if it is a single Hopper and no Joeys.

We have a service closet that all of the cables come into. That is where our node lives. 3 cables come in from the Dish antenna, and the various cables go out to their respective Hoppers/joeys.
  • Like
Reactions: Waterskier1
W
Ok, I guess this is like an enhanced version of what I now call "Triplexer" which "stacks" two sat antenna feeds onto a single coax, along with OTA signals. I'm getting the overall idea how this works. I realize that many people don't care to know these details, but I feel it necessary since I will be installing or directing the installation if I choose to upgrade at this time. My biggest concern is getting both OTA and MOCA to two different locations, assuming I locate the Hopper(s) in the basement "service closet" where all three Dish antenna coaxes along with OTA antenna coax enter my house. And without tearing out ceiling/wall drywall to run new cable(s). I'm guessing that wireless Joeys might be the answer, with OTA on the existing coaxes from the "service closet" to current locations. That would allow me to still use my Tivo on Local HD (much better quality than Dish compressed Locals) to supplement the Hopper(s).

Now, I it's determined that I need two Hoppers to meet recording demands (and I'll have to confirm that I'll need two if I use one in Prime Time mode), can 2-3 wireless joeys access all the recordings/signals tuned on both Hoppers?

Thanks for taking the time to educate me on this new (to me) technology.
That is correct. Without getting pedantic, the node acts as a router for your Hopper/Joey system. As others have said, it is installed between the Dish and the hopper. Single hopper systems use a Solo node, 2 hopper setups use a Duo node. The node is what separates the signals into specific bandwidths to carry carry multiple streams on a single cable. The system has to have a node even if it is a single Hopper and no Joeys.

We have a service closet that all of the cables come into. That is where our node lives. 3 cables come in from the Dish antenna, and the various cables go out to their respective Hoppers/joeys.
Of course, he said "without getting pedantic". For an average Joe, calling it the "router" even though it's not really doing any routing is a good way to describe its role in the system. Even my 53 year old mother knows what a router is, and what people call "routers" these days at home aren't truly just routers but also wireless access points and switches and sometimes modems too.
J
Ok, I guess this is like an enhanced version of what I now call "Triplexer" which "stacks" two sat antenna feeds onto a single coax, along with OTA signals. I'm getting the overall idea how this works. I realize that many people don't care to know these details, but I feel it necessary since I will be installing or directing the installation if I choose to upgrade at this time. My biggest concern is getting both OTA and MOCA to two different locations, assuming I locate the Hopper(s) in the basement "service closet" where all three Dish antenna coaxes along with OTA antenna coax enter my house. And without tearing out ceiling/wall drywall to run new cable(s). I'm guessing that wireless Joeys might be the answer, with OTA on the existing coaxes from the "service closet" to current locations. That would allow me to still use my Tivo on Local HD (much better quality than Dish compressed Locals) to supplement the Hopper(s).

Now, I it's determined that I need two Hoppers to meet recording demands (and I'll have to confirm that I'll need two if I use one in Prime Time mode), can 2-3 wireless joeys access all the recordings/signals tuned on both Hoppers?

Thanks for taking the time to educate me on this new (to me) technology.


The simple fact is that no, you cannot diplex OTA onto the same coax that is carrying signal to/from a Hopper or Joey.

This PDF is really, really great at explaining all the different components of a Hopper system (with the exception of Super Joeys): http://www.collinsdistribution.com/techservice/Whole_Home_Install_Configurations.pdf

The frequency plan for a Hopper system is the following:
Satellite: 950 MHz to 3 GHz. MoCA: 650 MHz to 875 MHz.

OTA in the US is on two bands: VHF: 54 and 216 MHz, UHF: 470 and 890 MHz.

Most channels these days are in UHF, so you're going to step all over the MoCA signal when you try to diplex OTA into the mix.

Since the Hopper is a server/client system, you only really need OTA at the Hopper location, not all of the Joeys, so maybe that will help simplify. And if you put Joeys (or even super joeys) at the TVs, you can re-use RF distribution cabling to distribute the MoCA signal.
J
I just re-read your post to try to better understand.

A couple of questions: How many tuners do you need active at one time (including both recording and viewing live TV)?

Are you OK with getting rid of the TiVo if you can do OTA on the Hopper, and distribute the Hopper's live TV and recorded TV to all locations?

Depending on those, you're probably in good shape with a Hopper in your basement and a Super Joey in the location of your 612. With that setup, 2 satellite tuners will be at the location of your 612, 3 satellite tuners + 1 OTA tuner will be at your Hopper in the basement, and the other TV location(s) will get their programming to a regular Joey via MoCA over coax. If everything is home-run back to your basement, no re-wiring should be necessary. You might need to swap out Whole Home Video Distribution stuff (like amps) with regular splitters, but otherwise should be in good shape.

And the box you want to keep for your RV, just put it in the RV. I wouldn't try to include it in this setup, it will drastically complicate things.
harshness
OTA in the US is on two bands: VHF: 54 and 216 MHz, UHF: 470 and 890 MHz.
In the US, UHF tops out at just under 700MHz now that the DTV conversion is essentially complete. Subsequent to the DTV conversion, both the FCC and CRTC have passed rules that will eventually take UHF channel 51 out of the picture through attrition.

Then end result, as you asserted, is a small overlap between the OTA and DISH's E-band MoCA (there is a big overlap with AT&T's D-band DECA) so planning on using both is generally not a good idea. With DOCSIS cable modem technology reaching up into the 1.3GHz range, diplexing cable isn't a good plan either.

If OTA is critical in all locations, an independent system should be run as all of the other technologies (CATV, DBS and MoCA) are infringing. MoCA is perhaps the most dangerous as its relatively high-power signal can damage equipment that isn't designed to block the frequencies.
J
In the US, UHF tops out at just under 700MHz now that the DTV conversion is essentially complete. Subsequent to the DTV conversion, both the FCC and CRTC have passed rules that will eventually take UHF channel 51 out of the picture through attrition.

Then end result, as you asserted, is a small overlap between the OTA and DISH's E-band MoCA (there is a big overlap with AT&T's D-band DECA) so planning on using both is generally not a good idea. With DOCSIS cable modem technology reaching up into the 1.3GHz range, diplexing cable isn't a good plan either.

If OTA is critical in all locations, an independent system should be run as all of the other technologies (CATV, DBS and MoCA) are infringing. MoCA is perhaps the most dangerous as its relatively high-power signal can damage equipment that isn't designed to block the frequencies.

Yeah, I learned so much about this because I was trying to diplex my cable modem onto a Hopper network and obviously that couldn't work. Technically it could have, since my cable modem is syncing to channels in the low 600mhz range, but I would have needed a filter to block anything above 700mhz, and of course there was no way to be sure that the cable company wouldn't want to switch me to other channels in the future. DOCSIS technically gets up to 1.3Ghz, but most cable systems are in the 900-950mhz range max.

Either way, I think the OP is going to be best served by a Hopper with an OTA module and not trying to get the OTA signal itself to all of the various locations, and just relying on the Hopper doing the tuning and sending programs out via clients and MoCA.
  • Like
Reactions: thomasjk
harshness
Either way, I think the OP is going to be best served by a Hopper with an OTA module and not trying to get the OTA signal itself to all of the various locations, and just relying on the Hopper doing the tuning and sending programs out via clients and MoCA.
If the previously undisclosed TiVo is to remain part of the mix, some manner of OTA distribution will be necessary at least at the TiVo location. For that, a separate cable should be pulled.

As I said, it is much, MUCH more important to know what the end game is than what's in play at the moment.
Bruce
Supporting Founder Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
With the 1st Quarter Report just released, Dish lost another 180,000, now at 4.84 Million.

Sling now at 1.79 million subscribers, down approximately 190,000.

For comparison, YouTube TV now has about double the subscribers of Dish and Sling combined.

71 Replies · 3401 views
fmj77
I'm surprised Dish still has that many subscribers. I don't know a single person in my area that is still with them after getting either Starlink or fiber at their home. They all cancelled Dish and went with streaming. I used to get offers pretty regularly in the mail to come back to Dish, but no more. Haven't seen one in a couple of years now.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Bruce
I'm surprised Dish still has that many subscribers. I don't know a single person in my area that is still with them after getting either Starlink or fiber at their home. They all cancelled Dish and went with streaming. I used to get offers pretty regularly in the mail to come back to Dish, but no more. Haven't seen one in a couple of years now.
Only about 3.6% of Households in the United States, still have Dish Network.

For comparison, YouTube TV has about 10%.
Y
$25 a month for 1 gig, for two years with Spectrum. I'd be darned that their router was MUCH better than AT&T's. I didn't realize that what I thought was something else was the bloody router. Those buffering issues stopped when I swapped... after AT&T refused to lower my bill, after 25 years of high speed internet service. They wanted $80 or so a month for 1 gig, with no drop to a lower speed.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
T
I despise that most of all. I'm going to talk to a remote?
T
$25 a month for 1 gig, for two years with Spectrum. I'd be darned that their router was MUCH better than AT&T's. I didn't realize that what I thought was something else was the bloody router. Those buffering issues stopped when I swapped... after AT&T refused to lower my bill, after 25 years of high speed internet service. They wanted $80 or so a month for 1 gig, with no drop to a lower speed.


1gbit up and down here from att start out great was suppose to be $60 for life of service, with years time it went back up to $80 I complained about they gave us $49 for year which about to end, I Wonder what prices will be when it "up" I in no way like ATT fiber service there DNS that are hardcode and unchange able in the router are some WORSE DNS I ever used. you know how much of pain it is to change DNS setting on EVERY single wireless device...
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
mwdxer1
Only about 3.6% of Households in the United States, still have Dish Network.

For comparison, YouTube TV has about 10%.
I dropped Dish a couple years back after having them for 25 years. The pricing got higher and after we got high speed internet, I watched it less and less. It got to the point all I watched was TCM for classic movies. Many of them are on You Tube now and a Premium subscription is $14 a month. A far cry of the $100 a month was paying with AT180, Supers, and locals. I get locals OTA anyway. I took down the dish several months ago and tossed it. I owned all my my equipment, so nothing to return. Do I miss a traditional cable type service? No way. If I want one I have all of the free live streaming with Roku, the Fire Stick, as well as Google TV. Right now as I type this, I am watching episodes of "The Midnight Special" from 1976 on You Tube, ad free. Dish was fine for many years. I do not regret buying the equipment and installing it myself (No installers in 1999). I enjoyed Dish for many years. My thoughts, Dish & Direct will be forced to merge in time, or they both will be gone. Even cable companies are getting out of TV. Some are only selling the internet and phone packages.
tanman
I despise that most of all. I'm going to talk to a remote?
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
nelson61
A lot of it flows back to the 4 big networks.
Cable and satellite are their money tree.

But, in reality, each market need 1 or perhaps 2 news feeds - not 4 or more
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
MikeD-C05
A lot of it flows back to the 4 big networks.
Cable and satellite are their money tree.

But, in reality, each market need 1 or perhaps 2 news feeds - not 4 or more
In my area we get 2 news feeds spread over 4 local stations.
ABC/NBC (TEGNA)
Same news cast simulcast over both channels.

CBS/Fox (Sinclair)
Same news casters at 5pm, 6pm, 10pm.
Fox shows an hour at 9pm but same news casters.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
zippyfrog
Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter
Last reply · posted in DISH Network Support Forum
Did anyone have a price increase today on their equipment? I own my VIP211k's, and they have been $5.00. My bill that I received last week shows the "add-ons" as being $5.00. However, I just logged into my Dish account, and my "add-ons" are now $10.00. Did the additional receivers go up by $5.00 recently?

As I mentioned, my last bill shows $5.00 and under the notes, nothing is mentioned about a price increase.
5 Replies · 60 views
zippyfrog
Never mind - according to chat, it seems like there is a glitch in their website. The prices for owned receivers are still $5.00.
zippyfrog
However, when I make a change (tried to add the Columbian pack for $2 so I could generate my bill) and there is a new line - it says "Access for TV" - whereas previously that line item was not there. I hope they aren't charging $5.00 for the initial TV now...

1781191675068.webp
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
T
Apparently it's not an "owned receiver" fee but rather an extension fee that's applied to 2nd and subsequent viewing. Maybe that played into their decision to force a box at every TV- garnering those fees
zippyfrog
Apparently it's not an "owned receiver" fee but rather an extension fee that's applied to 2nd and subsequent viewing. Maybe that played into their decision to force a box at every TV- garnering those fees
Possibly. In theory, $9 of the base pack has a rental fee built in. But now is this $5 a chance to get a little more? I don't know for sure. According to chat, it is a glitch and will be resolved in a timely manner, but we shall see. Part of my thinks there is a going to be a new charge, whether it is now or this fall. Here in Illinois, the law requires we are given 30 days notice of any fee changes, but I have not been given anything.

1781195549844.webp
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
MikeD-C05
These fees are why streaming has caught on so well across the country and DISH is losing subs each quarter. Soon won't be enough subs to be profitable.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
lordodogg
Last reply · posted in DIRECTV General Forum
Hello again, haven't posted here in a while.

This morning, around 6:30am, I woke up and found the front panel lights on my HR44 on (I leave it off all the time as it is co-located with one of my Geminis).

Immediately thinking that either a reboot or power outage occurred, I checked the software version, and found that it's still the same release that was sent out last month.

I then ruled out a power outage by checking the clocks on my appliances and seeing that they're still correct (they reset when there's an outage, somewhat similar to the "blinking 12" on VCRs).

I then confirmed a reboot by checking the Upcoming Recordings (fka To-Do List) and seeing that the number was much lower than before (it always resets after a reboot).

I am definitely guessing what happened (and it may very well be actually what happened) is that the "Reset Required" prompt may have come up sometime overnight, and it eventually timed out and rebooted automatically. IIRC that prompt comes up when new software "plugins" have to be installed.

Would like to hear your thoughts, especially since I probably haven't talked to some of you reading this in a while (was a former CE member, left almost a year ago).

Thank you all in advance!
4 Replies · 142 views
Tom Speer
My HR54 blue light is on this morning. I think you ae right about the plugins. They are tweaking things in the customer National release. What version does your HR44 Genie have now? I think you are probably on the same varsion as the CE group today.
lordodogg
I believe mine says 0x1D7F
Tom Speer
That is what I have.
  • Like
Reactions: lordodogg
lordodogg
Happened again today & have new software, 0x1d88
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in The Chit Chat Club
Sometimes a thread gets so many posts in it that is can cause issues for the server so that why today we introduce The Song Name Game Part 3!

So let the game continue!

The last song was added by Bobby who posted...

One Meat Ball - Andrews Sisters

CONTINUE ON AND HAVE FUN! WELCOME HOME TO SATELLITEGUYS.US!

Here are the original rules for the game as posted by WebbyDude back in 2006. http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/68645-Song-Name-Game

Just name a song title and the band who performed it. The next person does the same thing, but needs to list a song title or band name which includes a word from the previous entry. Pick songs from any genre.

Example:

Long Live Rock and Roll -- Rainbow

Rainbow in the Dark -- Dio

Another example:

Ride the Lightning -- Metallica

Lightning Strikes -- Ozzy Osbourne


Get it?


An additional note: we all know that song titles, sometimes, use profane words. Because this is a family friendly website it is advised that you clean up that title up a bit. This is accomplished by using something like sh!t instead of the real word. Thanks....
67106 Replies · 2662275 views
  • Like
Reactions: c-spand
ClarkGable
No Time - The Guess Who
  • Like
Reactions: sdfntx
harshness
Time After Time - Cyndi Lauper
sdfntx
Right on Time - Brandi Carlile
gms49ers
Time Stand Still - Rush
Bobby
I Can't Help It (If I'm Still In Love With You) - B.J. Thomas
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in SatelliteGuys Support Center
Our DNS provider is encouraging us to enable DNSSEC on our domains for added security.

I have gone ahead and enabled it, and am told it may take anywhere from 90 minutes to 24 hours for it to take effect.

Hopefully doing this does not harm the site in any way. (It shouldn't) but if it does, you will then know why and I will revert the settings.

But from what I am reading it should be ok. so just giving a warning as I have screwed up DNS stuff in the past. :D
1 Replies · 35 views
Scott Greczkowski
Doing my checks it appears the changes have gone through... and we are still here. (Phew!)
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in SatelliteGuys Support Center
Due to security concerns and the fact that the Tapatalk Plugin for Xenforo is no longer being updated we have removed Tapatalk support from SatelliteGuys.

For those who were using it we recommend using our PWA App instead which is faster and does not have all the spam Tapatalk had. Below is a graphic showing how to add SatelliteGuys to your devices home screen. (While iOS is shown the process is mostly the same for Android.)

add_to_home.gif

Thanks for your understanding. :)
7 Replies · 188 views
Foxbat
Thank you, Scott, for adding years to my Life and dropping my BP a few millimeters! Money well spent…
dweber
Thank you, Scott, for adding years to my Life and dropping my BP a few millimeters! Money well spent…
What is PWA app? PWA utilities seem to be a Spanish app. I hope you are seeing this since nothing seems to be working. I will miss SatelliteGuys. Tapatalk worked well. The Siri browser doesn't seem to work well.
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Peter Parker
Thank you, Scott, for adding years to my Life and dropping my BP a few millimeters! Money well spent…
Hooray!
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Peter Parker
What is PWA app? PWA utilities seem to be a Spanish app. I hope you are seeing this since nothing seems to be working. I will miss SatelliteGuys. Tapatalk worked well. The Siri browser doesn't seem to work well.
Do you mean the safari browser?
Foxbat
What is PWA app? PWA utilities seem to be a Spanish app. I hope you are seeing this since nothing seems to be working. I will miss SatelliteGuys. Tapatalk worked well. The Siri browser doesn't seem to work well.
Actually, PWA stands for "Progressive Web Application" and is basically just saving a site's homepage to your desktop where it appears as an "App" with the rest of your smartphone's Apps.
1781162703297.webp
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
A PWA is a custom version of SatelliteGuys which is optimized for mobile devices. While it may look like the website, its actually different so that only the files needed for mobile are sent, meaning its a much faster experience all around.

TapaTalk is essentially dead. It was written for PHP 5.4 and we are now running PHP 8.4. There have been a LOT of PHP security updates since then and since Tapatalk for Xenforo has not been updated in a long long time it is not the safest idea to keep running it.

In addition those trying to view the site on their mobile devices using a browser were getting spammed on the top of the screen for people to install TapaTalk, this ad in some cases would take up 20% of the users screen. We could get rid of that ad but we would have to pay $20 a month to get rid of it.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 085611.webp



In addition TapaTalk could and was inserting their own ads on SatelliteGuys in the app which only benefitted them, SatelliteGuys was not paid for those ads they were displaying on our site. Again we could pay to get rid of those ads.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 085641.webp


And here was the cost of the Premium Tier.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 085701.webp


Now to make matters worse Tapatalk recently announced that they are going to start charging users of the app 99 cents a month to continue using it.

Screenshot 2026-06-11 090141.webp



So soon you would be paying them each month to access SatelliteGuys via their app, again all the money going to them... and you would still see all their ads too.

Tapatalk was a great program which we run for many many years, and for a long time we DID pay for the premium tier. But now with such a small offset using it (My numbers show a total of 6 members) it wasn't work paying for any longer.

In addition Tapatalk was sold to a different owner who made lots of promises of improvements and updates but then that owner has been really radio silent since, instead they have been letting TapaTalk rot on the vine.

If you visit their support forum at https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/tapatalksupport/ you will see there is not much going on, in fact most of the support questions posted there go unanswered.

Please give the PWA a try, I was a die hard Tapatalk user myself but now only use the PWA on devices. It is a much better all around experience, with no bloatware or additional ads based on your user membership level.

I don't have an android phone so I could not make a graphic showing you how to add SatelliteGuys PWA to your phones apps or home screen. But here is a site that explains how to do it on all kinds of devices. How to Install a PWA on iOS, Android, Windows & Mac [2025 Guide]

The above link also explains PWA's better as well. :)

If Tapatalk were to update their plugins so we know we are more secure and up to date and allow us to remove the "Smart Banner" without having to pay $20 a month, we would consider adding it back. I don't even care about their ads, as if a user wants to use their app and is willing to sit through their ads in order to use that app then I am ok with it.

But hopefully that explains better why it was removed. It was not done to cut anyone off from the site. :) Please give the PWA a try.
NYDutch
A PWA is a custom version of SatelliteGuys which is optimized for mobile devices. While it may look like the website, its actually different so that only the files needed for mobile are sent, meaning its a much faster experience all around.

TapaTalk is essentially dead. It was written for PHP 5.4 and we are now running PHP 8.4. There have been a LOT of PHP security updates since then and since Tapatalk for Xenforo has not been updated in a long long time it is not the safest idea to keep running it.

In addition those trying to view the site on their mobile devices using a browser were getting spammed on the top of the screen for people to install TapaTalk, this ad in some cases would take up 20% of the users screen. We could get rid of that ad but we would have to pay $20 a month to get rid of it.

View attachment 191729


In addition TapaTalk could and was inserting their own ads on SatelliteGuys in the app which only benefitted them, SatelliteGuys was not paid for those ads they were displaying on our site. Again we could pay to get rid of those ads.

View attachment 191730

And here was the cost of the Premium Tier.

View attachment 191731

Now to make matters worse Tapatalk recently announced that they are going to start charging users of the app 99 cents a month to continue using it.

View attachment 191732


So soon you would be paying them each month to access SatelliteGuys via their app, again all the money going to them... and you would still see all their ads too.

Tapatalk was a great program which we run for many many years, and for a long time we DID pay for the premium tier. But now with such a small offset using it (My numbers show a total of 6 members) it wasn't work paying for any longer.

In addition Tapatalk was sold to a different owner who made lots of promises of improvements and updates but then that owner has been really radio silent since, instead they have been letting TapaTalk rot on the vine.

If you visit their support forum at https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/tapatalksupport/ you will see there is not much going on, in fact most of the support questions posted there go unanswered.

Please give the PWA a try, I was a die hard Tapatalk user myself but now only use the PWA on devices. It is a much better all around experience, with no bloatware or additional ads based on your user membership level.

I don't have an android phone so I could not make a graphic showing you how to add SatelliteGuys PWA to your phones apps or home screen. But here is a site that explains how to do it on all kinds of devices. How to Install a PWA on iOS, Android, Windows & Mac [2025 Guide]

The above link also explains PWA's better as well. :)

If Tapatalk were to update their plugins so we know we are more secure and up to date and allow us to remove the "Smart Banner" without having to pay $20 a month, we would consider adding it back. I don't even care about their ads, as if a user wants to use their app and is willing to sit through their ads in order to use that app then I am ok with it.

But hopefully that explains better why it was removed. It was not done to cut anyone off from the site. :) Please give the PWA a try.
I just installed the PWA on my Android phone. It was pretty easy to do, and now I'm posting this from my phone. Thanks, Scott!
Scott Greczkowski
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU! Cutting Edge
Last reply · posted in SatelliteGuys Support Center
As you may have noticed we are doing a Fund Raiser for SatelliteGuys!

As many of you know I have been paying for a majority of the operation of the site out of my own pocket for awhile now. Now looking at things we have a number of renewals coming up that I could use some help with. These renewals include the license renewal for our Forum Software, Renewal of a number of our add on's the site uses, renewal of domain names etc.

I have set a goal of $400.00 - any extra that comes in will just go to fund the operations of the site. None of the money will go to me (I tried BuyMeACoffee a few months ago, and they denied me saying they do not do business with Satellite Piracy sites... which we are not... hell we host the beta programs for both DISH and DIRECTV here...)

Anyways... if you would like to help out please click the link below.


Thank you in advance. :)
18 Replies · 567 views
Scott Greczkowski
I planned on removing it today, but then my fathers car broke down and I had to drive him all around to get his stuff done. Then I had a doctors appointment after that which was annoying...

Dr asks me if I have had any changes, so I tell him something wrong with me that started a month or so ago and his reply back is, that it sucks to get old... I hate that. Why ask me. if your going to come back with a smart ass answer.

Anyays I hope to get rid of Tapatalk tomorrow. :)

And we had more people donate today, thank you! The extra money is going to future expenses since things like add ons don't expire at the same time.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU AGAIN!
T
Yeah, dr's...joint pain? Your joints are wearing out. It hurts when I do this...don't do that
comfortably_numb
Dr asks me if I have had any changes, so I tell him something wrong with me that started a month or so ago and his reply back is, that it sucks to get old

No excuse for a flippant response like that from a doctor! I'd be looking for a different one.
Scott Greczkowski
Tapatalk has been removed.

I have added a new feature which is a work in progress called "Social Feed" which displays the forums Facebook style. Its nice for people who like that, but needs work. But i have been watching this one for awhile and the author is being really responsive to suggestions and adding them. So if you have any please let me know and I can pass them along. :)
navychop
😍
  • Like
Reactions: charlesrshell
Scott Greczkowski
We got more kind donations yesterday! Again a very big thank you to everyone for your support!
dfergie
Staff member HERE TO HELP YOU!
Last reply · posted in The Sports Section
111 Replies · 2726 views
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat and meStevo
Foxbat
Awesome pictures, Yespage! Thanks!

I caught the end of the four hour race on YouTube so I wasn't "spoiled", but got to see the exciting last lap action in the TCR division!
Y
Awesome pictures, Yespage! Thanks!

I caught the end of the four hour race on YouTube so I wasn't "spoiled", but got to see the exciting last lap action in the TCR division!
I heard on the radio, after the final pitstop, Turner Motorsport were resigned to second place. 'You're in second. Don't worry about it. First is McLaren, we aren't catching them.'
  • Like
Reactions: Foxbat
Y
Caught up to the 500... err... k in St. Louis. What a race! Andretti Motorsport were doing very well with Ericsson and Kirkwood, meanwhile Power was moving up the grid. Veekay started cautiously. He was working the tires just right, becoming more lethal later in the stint. Rasmussen was racing likewise, not nearly as insane as he has in the past. Palou was leading the race, in a shocker to all. Caio Collet was having a wonderful ride, making Ferucci potentially sweat a bit. Rain came, rain went, rain came, rain went. Generally mild sprinkles, but enough to pause racing on an oval.

Palou would kind of send Siegel into the wall. Siegel really didn't do much wrong. As he noted, you have to turn at some point. Palou had acres of room below and Siegel might have had his ticket out of Indycar stamped. Dixon was doing the fuel thing and got busted twice by yellows, not pitting before the flag came out. Then the most critical happened... Palou ran out of gas on pit lane, effectively giving Newgarden the race lead and win. Newgarden had a very early pit, so he was able to slide in, get service and go. Meanwhile, everyone else was confused and stuck behind Palou for a bit. Once people figured what was happening, Newgarden had a major advantage of several seconds. Newgarden wouldn't look back and when it went green again, he'd hold the lead for the win.

Massive credit to Juncos Hollinger who bested Penske in getting Veekay out before Malukas in a transition that was oddly bizarre. I haven't had time to check, but I'm wondering if Veekay was about to run out of fuel or cut a tire. He was charging late in a stint, got up to fifth, and then tailed back for a few laps to 10th or 11th. It looked like it was over. Went into the pits, and after the pitting sequence was over, Veekay was well inside the top ten again. It was weird. And he charged, getting up to fourth. He made a late move on Rasmussen, but Rasmussen held his position with some great driving. In fact, there was a ton of incredible racing passing, not passing all race long. Veekay would finish 4th. A podium would have been awesome, but it is a great outcome for a guy who hopefully will get a break with a big team. We saw what Veekay could do with a Honda last season with fuel save, imagine replacing Simpson on Ganassi and having speed to go with fuel saving. His 6th at Indy and 4th at St. Louis get him up to 13th in the points standings and only 5 points outside of the top 10.

Ericsson finished second, resigned to finishing behind the current best in the world guy on a short oval. Rasmussen got the final step on the podium, a nice rebound to what has been an otherwise bad year for him, and a good reward to ECR who just extended his contract.
Y
They raced USAC cars at Daytona once. Once! People died. Aj Foyt said 'f this', and left after the first go around. AJ freaking Foyt thought it was crazy! And cars weren't nearly as fast as they are now.

I think they tried Talladega once too.
Y
LeMans qualifying on going. WEC has d9ne a great job expanding the automotive company entries. Even without Porsche, a large nunber of manufacturers.