From the web page of the NAB "
The record in this proceeding fully demonstrates that the Commission's rulesgoverning retransmission consent and program exclusivity remain vital to fostering the Commission's goals of competition in the video programming marketplace and broadcast localism, particularly in small and rural markets, as well as necessary to protecting
broadcasters' right to freedom of contract. The free market process Congress established for retransmission consent evinced a clear intent to establish a marketplace for the rights to distribute broadcast signals, but not to dictate the outcome, or terms or conditions included in negotiations over those rights.
Contrary to complaints by various MVPDs, the retransmission consent system established by Congress is not broken. Rather, the system is beginning to work as Congress envisioned because emerging competition from DBS and other alternative MVPDs for the right to carry local broadcast signals has finally created genuine marketplace for retransmission consent rights. In other words, stripped to their essence,
most of the criticisms lodged against retransmission consent are really nothing more than objections to the new realities of competition among in the MVPD marketplace. Viewed in this light, it is apparent that the government intrusion into retransmission consent that the commenting MVPDs seek is neither warranted nor remotely consistent with
Congressional intent. Although the MVPDs allege that retransmission consent has failed to fulfill Congress' aims to fortify the free, over-the-air broadcast system, and to promote competition in the video programming marketplace, their assertions have no basis."
Now tell us Greggie boy --- how long have you been a staffer for the NAB?? hmmmmm